Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery
Tóm tắt
To evaluate and compare the recorded IOP values of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Three groups of 84, 182 and 43 patients each were treated by PRK for myopia, LASIK for myopia and LASIK for hyperopia respectively. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed in all eyes 1 day before and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with PDCT and GAT. Ultrasound pachymetry was performed in all eyes preoperatively and at 1st month postoperatively. Preoperatively and postoperatively, GAT readings were lower than PDCT in all groups (all p < 0.05). Postoperatively in the PRK group, compared to the preoperative value, the mean differences of IOP recorded with GAT at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month were −1.4 mmHg, −1.7 mmHg, −1.7 mmHg and −1.9 mmHg respectively (all p < 0.05). In the myopic LASIK group; the corresponding values with GAT were −3.6 mmHg, −3.6 mmHg, −3.6 mmHg and −3.5 mmHg (all p < 0.05), while in the hyperopic LASIK group the corresponding values were −1.1 mmHg, −0.7 mmHg, −1.1 mmHg and −0.9 mmHg (all p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference (GAT-PDCT) for myopic PRK, myopic LASIK and hyperopic LASIK were respectively −3.8 mmHg, −4.1 mmHg and −1.5 mmHg at the 12-month follow-up. No statistically significant changes were found for any group with the PDCT. GAT-determined IOP values were significant lower at all time-points after hyperopic LASIK, as well as myopic PRK or LASIK. The Pascal tonometry values remained unaffected for all groups.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Park HJ, Uhm KB, Hong C (2001) Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:303–309
Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA (2001) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 17:420–427
Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M (2001) Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 10:261–265
Schipper I, Senn P, Oyo-Szerenyi K, Peter R (2000) Central and peripheral pressure measurements with the Goldmann tonometer and Tono-Pen after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:929–933
Tamburrelli C, Giudiceandrea A, Vaiano AS, Caputo CG, Gullà F, Salgarello T (2005) Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3208–3213
Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Lang Y, Kagemann L, Harris A (2001) Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea 20:33–36
Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C (2004) Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:746–751
Lee GA, Khaw PT, Ficker LA, Shah P (2002) The corneal thickness and intraocular pressure story: where are we now? Clin Exp Ophthalmol 30:334–337
Kniestedt C, Kanngiesser H, Stamper RL (2005) Assessment of Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring IOP after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:458–459
Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ (2007) Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143:39–47
Alonso-Muñoz L, Lleó-Pérez A, Rahhal MS, Sanchis-Gimeno JA (2002) Assessment of applanation tonometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 21:156–160
Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleó-Pérez A, Rahhal SM, Alonso L (2004) Goldmann tonometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison between retreated and nonretreated patients. Cornea 23:674–679
Jarade EF, Abi Nader FC, Tabbara KF (2005) Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic and myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 21:408–410
Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landao D, Frucht-Pery J (2002) Intraocular pressure after LASIK for hyperopia. Ophthalmology 109:1659–1661
Wang X, Shen J, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD (2002) Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK. CLAO J 28:136–139
Cheng AC, Fan D, Tang E, Lam DS (2006) Effect of corneal curvature and corneal thickness on the assessment of intraocular pressure using noncontact tonometry in patients after myopic LASIK surgery. Cornea 25:26–28
Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF, Kounis G, Charisis S, Bouzoukis D, Ginis H, Yoo S, Tsilimbaris M, Pallikaris IG (2008) Ocular rigidity evaluation after photorefractive keratectomy: an experimental study. J Refract Surg 24:173–177
Munger R, Dohadwala AA, Hodge WG, Jackson WB, Mintsioulis G, Damji KF (2001) Changes in measured intraocular pressure after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1254–1262
Elsheikh A, Ross S, Alhasso D, Rama P (2009) Numerical study of the effect of corneal layered structure on ocular biomechanics. Curr Eye Res 34:26–35
Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Boehm AG, Pollack K (2006) A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg 22:263–267
Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pürsten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE (2006) Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 124:471–476
Rivera JL, Bell NP, Feldman RM (2008) Risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma progression: what we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Opthalmol 19:102–106
Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN (2006) Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye (Lond) 20:191–198
Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE, Koch R, Spoerl E (2008) Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:2472–2477