Distributional effects of water tariff reforms – An empirical study for Lima, Peru

WMO, 1992 UN, 2000 Batley, 2004, The politics of service delivery reform, Dev. Ch., 35, 31, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00341.x Kaimowitz, 1996, The political economy of environmental policy reform in Latin America, Dev. Ch., 27, 433, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00598.x Fankhauser, 2007, Can poor consumers pay for energy and water? An affordability analysis for transition countries, Energy Policy, 35, 1038, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.003 Agthe, 1987, Equity, price elasticity, and household income under increasing block rates for water, Am. J. Econ. Sociol., 46, 273, 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1987.tb01966.x Hajispyrou, 2002, Household demand and welfare: implications of water pricing in Cyprus, Environ. Dev. Econ., 7, 659, 10.1017/S1355770X02000402 Griffin, 2001, Effective water pricing, J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 37, 1335, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03643.x World Bank, 2000 OECD, 2009 Komives, 2005 V. Foster, S. Pattanayak, L. Stalker Prokopy, Can subsidies be better targeted?, Series on Water Tariffs and Subsidies in South Asia Paper 5, Water Sanitation Program, New Delhi, 2002. Gómez Lobo, 2003, Water subsidy policies: a comparison of the Chilean and Colombian schemes, World Bank Econ. Rev., 17, 391, 10.1093/wber/lhg028 V. Foster, T. Yepes, Is Cost Recovery a Feasible Objective for Water and Electricity? The Latin American Experience, Policy Research Working Paper 3943, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2006. V. Foster, Towards a Social Policy for Argentina’s Infrastructure Sectors: Evaluating the Past and Exploring the Future, Policy Research Working Paper 3422, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2004. Lobo, 2001 Dagdeviren, 2008, Waiting for miracles: the commercialization of urban water services in Zambia, Dev. Ch., 39, 101, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00470.x Ruijs, 2008, Demand and distributional effects of water pricing policies, Ecol. Econ., 66, 506, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.015 V. Foster, A. Gómez-Lobo, J. Halpern, Designing Direct Subsidies for Water and Sanitation Services – Panama: A Case Study, Policy ResearchWorking Paper 2344, The World Bank,Washington, DC, 2000. Ruijs, 2009, Welfare and distribution effects of water pricing policies, Environ. Res. Econ., 43, 161, 10.1007/s10640-008-9228-6 Diakité, 2009, A proposal for social pricing of water supply in Côte d’Ivoire, J. Dev. Econ., 88, 258, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.03.003 Rietveld, 2000, Block rate pricing of water in Indonesia: an analysis of welfare effects, Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud., 36, 73, 10.1080/00074910012331338983 Groom, 2008, Resource pricing and poverty alleviation: the case of block tariffs for water in Beijing, Environ. Policy, 48, 213, 10.1007/978-1-4020-6615-3_9 Renzetti, 1992, Evaluating the welfare effects of reforming municipal water prices, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 22, 147, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90011-K Garcia, 2004, Estimating the benefits of efficient water pricing in France, Resour. Energy Econ., 26, 175, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.05.001 Coase, 1946, The marginal cost controversy, Economica, 13, 169, 10.2307/2549764 Ramsey, 1927, A contribution to the theory of taxation, Econ. J., 37, 47, 10.2307/2222721 Boiteux, 1956, Sur la gestion des monopolies publics astreints à l’equilibre budgétaire, Econometrica, 24, 22, 10.2307/1905256 Marques, 2010 Nauges, 2010, Estimation of water demand in developing countries: an overview, World Bank Res. Obs., 25, 263, 10.1093/wbro/lkp016 V. Foster, S. Pattanayak, L. Stalker Prokopy, Do Current Water Subsidies Reach the Poor?, Series on Water Tariffs and Subsidies in South Asia Paper 4, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2002. I. Walker, F. Ordoñez, P. Serrano, J. Halpern, Pricing, Subsidies and the Poor: Demand for Improved Water Services in Central America, Policy Research Working Paper 2468, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2000. K. Komives, J. Halpern, V. Foster, Q. Wodon, The Distributional Incidence of Residential Water and Electricity Services, Policy Research Working Paper 3878, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2006. Komives, 2007, Utility subsidies as social transfers: an empirical evaluation of targeting performance, Dev. Policy Rev., 25, 659, 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00391.x Angel-Urdinola, 2007, Do utility subsidies reach the poor? Framework and evidence for Cape Verde, Sao Tome, and Rwanda, Econ. Bull., 9, 1 Bonifaz, 2013 Bithas, 2008, The sustainable residential water use: sustainability, efficiency and social equity. The European experience, Ecol. Econ., 68, 221, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.021 Boland, 2000, The Political economy of water tariff design in developing countries: increasing block tariff versus uniform price with rebate, 215 Whittington, 2003, Municipal water pricing and tariff design: a reform agenda for South Asia, Water Policy, 5, 61, 10.2166/wp.2003.0003 Whittington, 1992, Possible adverse effects of increasing block water tariffs in developing countries, Econ. Dev. Cult. Ch., 41, 75, 10.1086/451996 S. Debomy, D.T. Lauria, O.S. Hopkins, Pro-poor Subsidies for Water Connections in West Africa: A preliminary study. Executive Summary, Water Supply and Sanitation Working Notes No. 4, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005. Estache, 2002 OECD, 2003 Dahan, 2007, The unintended consequences of IBT pricing policy in urban water, Water Resour. Res., 43, W03402, 10.1029/2005WR004493 D. le Blanc, A Framework for Analyzing Tariffs and Subsidies in Water Provision to Urban Households in Developing Countries, DESA Working Paper No. 63, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, 2008. Martins, 2013, Assessing social concerns in water tariffs, Water Policy, 15, 193, 10.2166/wp.2012.024 Gawel, 2013, Affordability of water supply in Mongolia: empirical lessons for measuring affordability, Water Policy, 15, 19, 10.2166/wp.2012.192 Howard, 2003 B.J. Reed, Minimum Water Quantity Needed for Domestic Uses, WHO/SEARO Technical Notes for Emergencies Technical Note No. 9, WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, 2005. Gawel, 2011, Affordability as an institutional obstacle to water-related price reforms, 9 Coady, 2004 CETI, Diseño y simulación del nuevo esquema de subsidios para los servicios de agua potable y alcantarillado en el ámbito de las Empresas Prestadoras de Servicios de Saneamiento (EPS) en el Perú – Informe de Avance I, Centro de Estudios de Transporte e Infraestructura S.A. (CETI), Buenos Aires, 2008. Olmstead, 2007, Water demand under alternative price structures, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 54, 181, 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.03.002 Nataraj, 2011, Does marginal price matter? A regression discontinuity approach to estimating water demand, J. Environ. Economics Manag., 61, 198, 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.003 MEF, SISFOH – Metodología de Cálculo del Índice de Focalización de Hogares, Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas, Lima, 2010. Valderrama Torres, 2011, Propuesta metodológica para la focalización individual de los programas sociales, Rev. Estudios Econ., 21, 65