The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities
Tóm tắt
This paper investigates the influence of prosodic structure on the process of sentence comprehension, with a specific focus on the relative contributions of syntactic and prosodic information to the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. We argue that prosodic structure provides an initial memory representation for spoken sentences, and that information from this prosodic representation is available to inform syntactic parsing decisions. This view makes three predictions for the processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity: 1. When prosodic and syntactic boundaries coincide, syntactic processing should be facilitated. 2. When prosodic boundaries are placed at misleading points in syntactic structure, syntactic processing should show interference effects. 3. The processing difficulties that have been reliably demonstrated in reading experiments for syntactically complex sentences should disappear when those sentences are presented with a felicitous prosodic structure in listening experiments. These predictions were confirmed by series of experiments measuring end-of-sentence comprehension time and cross-modal naming time for sentences with temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Sentences with coinciding or conflicting prosodic and syntactic boundaries were compared to a prosodic baseline condition.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beach, C. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations.Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627–643.
Carlson, G. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: Thematic relations, 21, New York: Academic Press.
Carroll, P. J., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1987). Models and modules: Multiple pathways to the language processor. In J. Garfield (Ed.)Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding (pp. 221–247). New York: Academic Press.
Dobroth, K. M., & Speer, S. R. (1995). A time course analysis of prosodic effects on the resolution of closure ambiguity. Presentation to the Annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, Tuscon, AZ.
Fernald, A. (1984). The perceptual and affective salience of mothers' speech to infants. In L. Feagans, C. Garvey, & Golinkoff, R. (Eds.)The origins and growth of communication. Norwood, N.J: Ablex.
Ferreira, F. (1993). The creation of prosody during sentence production.Psychological Review, 100, 233–253.
Ferreira, F., & Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language? In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.),Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 559–585.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology, 143, 178–210.
Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal.Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411–458.
Jusczyk, P. W., & Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1993). Syntactic units, prosody, and psychological reality during infancy.Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Kjelgaard, M. M. (1995).The role of prosodic structure in the resolution of phrase-level and lexical syntactic ambiguity. Unpublished dissertation, Northeastern University.
Ladd, R. D. (1986). Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure.Phonology Yearbook, 3, 311–340.
Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity.Glossa, 7, 107–122.
Lehiste, I., Olive, J. P., & Streeter, L. A. (1976). The role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199–1202.
Lieberman, P. (1968). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. In R. C. Oldfield & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Language, Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N., & Seidenberg, M. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.
Marcus, M., & Hindle, D. (1990). Description theory and intonation boundaries. In G. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Computational and psycholinguistic perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.Cognition, 8. 1–71.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73–87.
Nespor, M. A., & Vogel, I. (1986)Prosodic Phonology. Boston: Klewer.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980).The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Price, P., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956–2970.
Pritchett, B. L. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing.Language, 64, 539–576.
Selkirk, E. O. (1984).Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Selkirk, E. O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology.Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371–405.
Selkirk, E. O. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing.Handbook of Phonological Theory, Blackwell.
Slowiaczek, M. (1981).Prosodic units as processing units. Unpublished dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Speer, S. R., & Bernstein, M. K. (1992).Prosodic resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity. Presentation to the 25th International Congress of Psychology, Brussels, Belgium.
Speer, S. R., & Dobroth, K. M. (1993).Rhythmic effects in auditory and visual sentence processing. Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, D.C.
Speer, S. R., & Dobroth, K. M. (1996 ms.). Junctural and temporal aspects of prosody: Ambiguity resolution in auditory and visual sentence processing.
Speer, S. R., & Kjelgaard, M. M. (1992).The influence of prosodic structure on processing temporary syntactic ambiguity. Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
Speer, S. R., & Kjelgaard, M. M. (1994). Prosodic structure influences syntactic attachments during sentence comprehension. Presentation to the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Tuscon, AZ.
Steedman, M. (1990). Syntax and intonational structure in a combinatory grammar. In G. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Computational and psycholinguistic perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tyler, L. K., & Warren, P. (1987). Local and global structure in spoken language comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 638–657.
Wales, R., & Toner, H. (1979). Intonation and ambiguity. In W. E. Cooper and E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wingfield, A., & Klein, J. F. (1971). Syntactic structure and acoustic pattern in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 23–25.