Mapping Europe’s institutional landscape for forest ecosystem service provision, innovations and governance

Angelstam, 2018, Wood production and biodiversity conservation are rival forestry objectives in Europe’s Baltic Sea Region, Ecosphere, 9, 10.1002/ecs2.2119 Barras, 1990, Interactive innovation in financial and business services: the vanguard of the service revolution, Res. Policy, 19, 215, 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90037-7 Barton, 2017, Payments for Ecosystem Services as a Policy Mix: Demonstrating the institutional analysis and development framework on conservation policy instruments, Environmental Policy and Governance, 27, 404, 10.1002/eet.1769 Biermann, 2007, Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research, Global Environ. Change, 17, 326, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010 Blicharska, 2015, What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Białowieża Forest in Poland, Forest Policy Econ., 57, 22, 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.04.003 Smits, 2010 Bonsu, 2019, Conservation conflict: Managing forestry versus hen harrier species under Europe's Birds Directive, J. Environ. Manage., 252, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109676 Borgström, 2014, The compatibility of the Habitats Directive with the novel EU Green Infrastructure policy, Eur. Energy Environ. Law Rev., 23, 36 Börner, 2017, The effectiveness of payments for environmental services, World Dev., 96, 359, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020 Bouwma, 2018, Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies, Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 213, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 Brockerhoff, 2017, Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services, Biodivers. Conserv., 26, 3005, 10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2 Burkhard, 2012, Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecol. Ind., 21, 17, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 Busetto, L., Barredo Cano, J., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. (2014). Developing a spatially-explicit pan-European dataset of forest biomass increment. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition - Hamburg 2014. European Biomass Conference, p. 41-46. JRC87643. Carrillo-Hermosilla, 2010, Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies, J. Cleaner Prod., 18, 1073, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 Cash, 2006, Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world, Ecol. Soc., 11, 10.5751/ES-01759-110208 Davis, 1970, Institutional change and American economic growth: A first step towards a theory of institutional innovation, J. Econ. Hist., 30, 131, 10.1017/S0022050700078633 de Groot, 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecol. Complex., 7, 260, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Dick, J., Turkelboom, F., Woods, H., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Primmer, E., Saarela, S-R…. Zulian, G. 2018. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: results from 27 case studies. Ecosystem Services, Volume 29, Part C, 552-565. Drever, 2006, Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience?, Can. J. For. Res., 36, 2285, 10.1139/x06-132 EU (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU. EC (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Our Life Insurance, our Natural Capital: an EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. COM/2011/0244 final. EC (2013). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A New EU Forest Strategy: For Forests and the Forest-Based Sector. Mechanism for Monitoring and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Other Information Relevant to Climate Change. EC (2019) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019, COM(2019) 640 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf. Eyvindson, 2019, Quantifying and easing conflicting goals between interest groups in natural resource planning, Can. J. For. Res., 49, 1233, 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0026 2010 Galaz, 2012, ‘Planetary boundaries’ – Exploring the challenges for global environmental governance, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 4, 80, 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.006 Gallouj, 1997, Innovation in services, Res. Policy, 26, 537, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9 Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Geneletti, 2011, Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning, Int. J. Biodiv. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage., 7, 143, 10.1080/21513732.2011.617711 Geneletti, 2015, A conceptual approach to promote the integration of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment, J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 17, 1550035, 10.1142/S1464333215500350 Geneletti, 2018, Assessing ecosystem services and biodiversity tradeoffs across agricultural landscapes in a mountain region, Int. J. Biodiv. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage., 14, 189, 10.1080/21513732.2018.1526214 Gómez-Baggethun, 2010, The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 Gopalakrishnan, 1997, A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management, Omega, 25, 15, 10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00043-6 Han, 2013, Connecting market orientation, learning orientation and corporate social responsibility implementation: is innovativeness a mediator?, Scand. J. For. Res., 28, 784, 10.1080/02827581.2013.833290 Hargrave, 2006, A collective action model of institutional innovation, Acad. Manag. Rev., 31, 864, 10.5465/amr.2006.22527458 Harrinkari, 2016, Stakeholder coalitions in forest politics: revision of Finnish Forest Act, Forest Policy Econ., 67, 30, 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.006 Hauck, 2013, Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives, Environ. Sci. Policy, 25, 13, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001 Howlett, 1991, Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice, Policy Stud. J., 19, 1, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1991.tb01878.x Howlett, 2019 IPBES (2019): Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio E.S., H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G.F.Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I.J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis, and C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages. IPCC (2000). Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, A Special Report of the IPCC Cambridge University Press, 377 pp. Kistenkas, 2018, Barriers for the ecosystem services concept in European water and nature conservation law, Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 223, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.013 Kivimaa, 2010, Making or breaking environmental innovation?: Technological change and innovation markets in the pulp and paper industry, Manage. Res. Rev., 33, 289, 10.1108/01409171011030426 Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 Kleinschmit, 2014, Shades of green: a social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector, Scand. J. For. Res., 29, 402, 10.1080/02827581.2014.921722 Kluvánková, 2018, Understanding social innovation for the well-being of forest-dependent communities: A preliminary theoretical framework, Forest Policy Econ., 97, 163, 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.016 Konrad, 2012, Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 79, 1084, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.008 Kubeczko, 2006, The role of sectoral and regional innovation systems in supporting innovations in forestry, Forest Policy Econ., 8, 704, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.011 Kuhlmann, 2019, The tentative governance of emerging science and technology – A conceptual introduction, Res. Policy, 5, 1091, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006 Loft, 2015, Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities, Ecosyst. Serv., 16, 150, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002 Lovrić, 2020, Non-wood forest products in Europe – A quantitative overview, Forest Policy Econ., 116, 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102175 Maes, 2012, Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 31, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 Malinga, 2015, Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – A review, Ecosyst. Serv., 13, 57, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006 Makkonen, 2015, Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: An ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources, Forest Policy Econ., 50, 153, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.003 Mattila, 2013, Non-industrial private forestry service markets in a flux: results from a qualitative analysis on Finland, Small-scale forestry, 12, 559, 10.1007/s11842-012-9231-1 Morrar, 2014, Innovation in services: A literature review, Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev., 4, 10.22215/timreview/780 Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of a useful theory of innovation. In Innovation, economic change and technology policies (pp. 215-245). Birkhäuser, Basel. Neumeier, 2012, Why do social innovation in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovation in rural development research, Sociologia Ruralis, 52, 48, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x Orsi, 2020, Mapping hotspots and bundles of forest ecosystem services across the European Union, Land Use Policy, 99, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104840 Paavola, 2013, Ecosystem services, governance, and stakeholder participation: An introduction, Ecol. Soc., 18, 10.5751/ES-06019-180442 Paavola, 2019, Governing the provision of insurance value from ecosystems, Ecol. Econ., 164, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.06.001 Paracchini, 2014, Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU, Ecol. Ind., 45, 371, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018 Potschin, 2011, Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 35, 575, 10.1177/0309133311423172 Primmer, 2011, Analysis of institutional adaptation: Integration of biodiversity conservation into forestry, J. Cleaner Prod., 19, 1822, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.001 Primmer, 2012, Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: Do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems?, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 85, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008 Primmer, 2015, Governance of ecosystem services: A framework for empirical analysis, Ecosyst. Serv., 16, 158, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002 Primmer, 2013, Evolution in Finland's forest biodiversity conservation payments and the institutional constraints on establishing new policy, Soc. Natl. Resourc., 26, 1137, 10.1080/08941920.2013.820814 Rammel, 2003, Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: Adaptive flexibility and risk minimising, Ecol. Econ., 47, 121, 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00193-9 Raudsepp-Hearne, 2010, Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107, 5242, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107 Rhodes, 1997 Rodríguez, 2006, Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services, Ecol. Soc., 11, 10.5751/ES-01667-110128 Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis, Res. Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 Ruhl, 2013 Ruhl, 2016, Adaptive management of ecosystem services across different land use regimes, J. Environ. Manage., 183, 418, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.066 Saarikoski, 2015, Exploring operational ecosystem service definitions: The case of boreal forests, Ecosyst. Serv., 14, 144, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.006 Saarikoski, 2018, Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice, Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 579, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019 Schot, 2018, Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Res. Policy, 47, 1554, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 Scott, 2014 Sengers, 2016 2010 Sotirov, 2018, Integrated Forest Governance in Europe: An introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management, Land Use Policy, 79, 960, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.042 UNDSG 2015. United Nations, 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Outcome document for the UN Summit to Adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Draft for Adoption, New York. Van de Ven, 1986, Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, Manage. Sci., 32, 590, 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590 Vatn, 2010, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018 Verburg, 2016, Governing ecosystem services: National and local lessons from policy appraisal and implementation, Ecosyst. Serv., 18, 186, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.006 Verkerk, 2020, Climate-smart forestry: The missing link, Forest Policy Econ., 115, 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102164 Vihervaara, 2019, Methodological interlinkages for mapping ecosystem services–from data to analysis and decision-support, One Ecosystem, 4, 10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368 Visscher, 2019 2019 Voss, 2018, A novel understanding of experimentation in governance: co-producing innovations between ‘‘lab’’ and ‘‘field’’, Policy Sci., 51, 213, 10.1007/s11077-018-9313-9 Weatherley, 1977, Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special-education reform, Harvard Educ. Rev., 47, 171, 10.17763/haer.47.2.v870r1v16786270x Winkel, 2016, Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration, Environ. Plan. C: Govern. Policy, 34, 496, 10.1068/c1356j Wolff, 2015, Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives, Ecol. Ind., 55, 159, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016 Wolf, 2006, Between incentives and action: a pilot study of biodiversity conservation competencies for multifunctional forest management in Finland, Soc. Natl. Resour., 19, 845, 10.1080/08941920600835601 Wunder, 2008, Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 279, 10.1017/S1355770X08004282 Wurzel, 2013 Young, 1999, Institutional dimensions of global environmental change, Public Admin. Public Policy, 2, 100 Zambelli, 2012, A GIS decision support system for regional forest management to assess biomass availability for renewable energy production, Environ. Modell. Software, 2012–38, 203, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.05.016