The challenge of knowledge exchange in national policy impact assessment – A case of Finnish climate policy

Environmental Science and Policy - Tập 54 - Trang 340-348 - 2015
Sanna‐Riikka Saarela1, Tarja Söderman2,1
1Environmental Policy Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Mechelininkatu 34a, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
2Environment Centre, P.O. Box 44, FI-02070 City of Espoo, Finland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersen, 2007

Beck, 2011, Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation, Reg. Environ. Change, 11, 297, 10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2

Bracken, 2013, Making sense of policy implementation: the construction and uses of expertise and evidence in managing freshwater environments, Environ. Sci. Policy, 30, 10, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.010

Carroll, 2010, Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy?, Policy Soc., 29, 113, 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.009

Cash, 2003, Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 8086, 10.1073/pnas.1231332100

Contandriopoulos, 2010, Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature, Milkbank Q., 88, 444, 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00608.x

Cornell, 2013, Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change, Environ. Sci. Policy, 28, 60, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008

EC European Commission, 2009

Fazey, 2013, Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management, Environ. Conserv., 40, 19, 10.1017/S037689291200029X

Fazey, 2014, Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research, Glob. Environ. Change, 25, 204, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012

Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inquiry, 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363

Gerring, 2007

Graham, 2006, Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?, J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof., 26, 13, 10.1002/chp.47

Guston, 1999, Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science, Soc. Stud. Sci., 29, 87, 10.1177/030631299029001004

Guston, 2001, Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 26, 399, 10.1177/016224390102600401

Haug, 2011, Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 78, 968, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.001

Hegger, 2012, Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action, Environ. Sci. Policy, 18, 52, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002

Hellström, 2003, Boundary organisations in science: from discourse to construction, Sci. Public Policy, 30, 235, 10.3152/147154303781780371

Hertin, 2009, Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process, Environ. Plann. A, 41, 1185, 10.1068/a40266

Hertin, 2009, The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment – an empirical analysis, For. Policy Econ., 11, 413, 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.004

Holmes, 2008, Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation, Environ. Sci. Policy, 11, 702, 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.08.004

Hoppe, 2010, Lost in translation? Boundary work in making climate change governable, 109

Hoppe, 2014, Comparing the role of boundary organizations in the governance of climate change in three EU member states, Environ. Sci. Policy, 44, 73, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.002

Jordan, 2010, Preface

Lee, 2014, The potential role of boundary organizations in the climate regime, Environ. Sci. Policy, 36, 24, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.008

Lemos, 2005, The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments, Glob. Environ. Change, 15, 57, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004

Leroy, 2010, Climate, science, society and politics, 15

Lomas, 2007, The in-between world of knowledge brokering, Br. Med. J., 334, 129, 10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE

Lyytimäki, 2015, Knowledge brokerage at the science–policy interface: new perspectives on tools for policy appraisal, Environ. Sci. Policy, 51, 313, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.007

McNie, 2007, Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10, 17, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004

MEE, 2013

MEE [Ministry of Employment and the Economy], 2013

Meuleman, 2014, Owl meets beehive: how impact assessment and governance relate, Impact Assess. Project Apprais., 33, 4, 10.1080/14615517.2014.956436

Meyer, 2010, The rise of the knowledge broker, Sci. Commun., 32, 118, 10.1177/1075547009359797

Michaels, 2009, Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings, Environ. Sci. Policy, 12, 994, 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.05.002

Miller, 2001, Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 26, 478, 10.1177/016224390102600405

Morgan, 1998

Morrison-Saunders, 2014, Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus, Impact Assess. Project Apprais., 32, 2, 10.1080/14615517.2013.872841

National Audit Office, 2011

Owens, 2006, Boundary work: knowledge, policy, and the urban environment, Environ. Plann. C: Govern. Policy, 24, 633, 10.1068/c0606j

Parker, 2006, Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate, Int. J. Res. Method Educ., 29, 23, 10.1080/01406720500537304

Partidario, 2013, Knowledge brokerage – potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 39, 26, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.02.002

Pielke, 2007

Radaelli, 1995, The role of knowledge in the policy process, J. Eur. Public Policy, 2, 159, 10.1080/13501769508406981

Radaelli, 2004, The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis – best practice or lesson-drawing?, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 43, 723, 10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00172.x

Reed, 2014, Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management, J. Environ. Manage., 146, 337, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021

Saarela, 2015, Knowledge brokerage context factors – what matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 51, 325, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.001

Sarewitz, 2004, How science makes environmental controversies worse, Environ. Sci. Policy, 7, 385, 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001

Sarewitz, 2007, The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10, 5, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001

Sarkki, 2015, Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: a novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016

Sheate, 2010, Strategic approaches and assessment techniques – potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30, 278, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.10.003

Snell, 2006, Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency?, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26, 359, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003

Spruijt, 2014, Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: a literature review, Environ. Sci. Policy, 40, 16, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002

Stake, 1995

Turnpenny, 2008, Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 51, 759, 10.1080/09640560802423541

van den Hove, 2007, A rationale for science–policy interfaces, Futures, 39, 807, 10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004

van der Sluijs, 2010, Uncertainty and complexity. The need for new ways on interfacing climate science and climate policy, 31

van Enst, 2014, Towards productive science–policy interfaces: a research agenda, J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 16, 1450007, 10.1142/S1464333214500070

van Kammen, 2006, Using the knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: the need for support structures, Bull. World Health Organ., 84, 608, 10.2471/BLT.05.028308

Ward, 2009, Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?, Evid. Policy, 5, 267, 10.1332/174426409X463811

Ward, 2012, Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy, Soc. Sci. Med., 74, 297, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.021

Wesselink, 2013, Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface, Environ. Sci. Policy, 30, 1, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008