The challenge of knowledge exchange in national policy impact assessment – A case of Finnish climate policy
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersen, 2007
Beck, 2011, Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation, Reg. Environ. Change, 11, 297, 10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2
Bracken, 2013, Making sense of policy implementation: the construction and uses of expertise and evidence in managing freshwater environments, Environ. Sci. Policy, 30, 10, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.010
Carroll, 2010, Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy?, Policy Soc., 29, 113, 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.009
Cash, 2003, Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 8086, 10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Contandriopoulos, 2010, Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature, Milkbank Q., 88, 444, 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00608.x
Cornell, 2013, Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change, Environ. Sci. Policy, 28, 60, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
EC European Commission, 2009
Fazey, 2013, Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management, Environ. Conserv., 40, 19, 10.1017/S037689291200029X
Fazey, 2014, Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research, Glob. Environ. Change, 25, 204, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012
Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inquiry, 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363
Gerring, 2007
Graham, 2006, Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?, J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof., 26, 13, 10.1002/chp.47
Guston, 1999, Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science, Soc. Stud. Sci., 29, 87, 10.1177/030631299029001004
Guston, 2001, Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 26, 399, 10.1177/016224390102600401
Haug, 2011, Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 78, 968, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.001
Hegger, 2012, Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action, Environ. Sci. Policy, 18, 52, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002
Hellström, 2003, Boundary organisations in science: from discourse to construction, Sci. Public Policy, 30, 235, 10.3152/147154303781780371
Hertin, 2009, Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process, Environ. Plann. A, 41, 1185, 10.1068/a40266
Hertin, 2009, The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment – an empirical analysis, For. Policy Econ., 11, 413, 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.004
Holmes, 2008, Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation, Environ. Sci. Policy, 11, 702, 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.08.004
Hoppe, 2010, Lost in translation? Boundary work in making climate change governable, 109
Hoppe, 2014, Comparing the role of boundary organizations in the governance of climate change in three EU member states, Environ. Sci. Policy, 44, 73, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.002
Jordan, 2010, Preface
Lee, 2014, The potential role of boundary organizations in the climate regime, Environ. Sci. Policy, 36, 24, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.008
Lemos, 2005, The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments, Glob. Environ. Change, 15, 57, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004
Leroy, 2010, Climate, science, society and politics, 15
Lomas, 2007, The in-between world of knowledge brokering, Br. Med. J., 334, 129, 10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE
Lyytimäki, 2015, Knowledge brokerage at the science–policy interface: new perspectives on tools for policy appraisal, Environ. Sci. Policy, 51, 313, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.007
McNie, 2007, Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10, 17, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004
MEE, 2013
MEE [Ministry of Employment and the Economy], 2013
Meuleman, 2014, Owl meets beehive: how impact assessment and governance relate, Impact Assess. Project Apprais., 33, 4, 10.1080/14615517.2014.956436
Michaels, 2009, Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings, Environ. Sci. Policy, 12, 994, 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.05.002
Miller, 2001, Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 26, 478, 10.1177/016224390102600405
Morgan, 1998
Morrison-Saunders, 2014, Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus, Impact Assess. Project Apprais., 32, 2, 10.1080/14615517.2013.872841
National Audit Office, 2011
Owens, 2006, Boundary work: knowledge, policy, and the urban environment, Environ. Plann. C: Govern. Policy, 24, 633, 10.1068/c0606j
Parker, 2006, Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate, Int. J. Res. Method Educ., 29, 23, 10.1080/01406720500537304
Partidario, 2013, Knowledge brokerage – potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 39, 26, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.02.002
Pielke, 2007
Radaelli, 1995, The role of knowledge in the policy process, J. Eur. Public Policy, 2, 159, 10.1080/13501769508406981
Radaelli, 2004, The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis – best practice or lesson-drawing?, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 43, 723, 10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00172.x
Reed, 2014, Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management, J. Environ. Manage., 146, 337, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021
Saarela, 2015, Knowledge brokerage context factors – what matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 51, 325, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.001
Sarewitz, 2004, How science makes environmental controversies worse, Environ. Sci. Policy, 7, 385, 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
Sarewitz, 2007, The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10, 5, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001
Sarkki, 2015, Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: a novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces, Environ. Sci. Policy, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016
Sheate, 2010, Strategic approaches and assessment techniques – potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30, 278, 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.10.003
Snell, 2006, Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency?, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26, 359, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003
Spruijt, 2014, Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: a literature review, Environ. Sci. Policy, 40, 16, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002
Stake, 1995
Turnpenny, 2008, Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 51, 759, 10.1080/09640560802423541
van den Hove, 2007, A rationale for science–policy interfaces, Futures, 39, 807, 10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004
van der Sluijs, 2010, Uncertainty and complexity. The need for new ways on interfacing climate science and climate policy, 31
van Enst, 2014, Towards productive science–policy interfaces: a research agenda, J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 16, 1450007, 10.1142/S1464333214500070
van Kammen, 2006, Using the knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: the need for support structures, Bull. World Health Organ., 84, 608, 10.2471/BLT.05.028308
Ward, 2009, Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?, Evid. Policy, 5, 267, 10.1332/174426409X463811
Ward, 2012, Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy, Soc. Sci. Med., 74, 297, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.021