Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions

The Spine Journal - Tập 13 - Trang 1339-1349 - 2013
Kristen E. Radcliff1, Christopher K. Kepler1, Andre Jakoi2, Gursukhman S. Sidhu1, Jeffrey Rihn1, Alexander R. Vaccaro1, Todd J. Albert1, Alan S. Hilibrand1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boden, 1990, Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72, 403, 10.2106/00004623-199072030-00013 Elfering, 2002, Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals, Spine, 27, 125, 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00002 Hilibrand, 1999, Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, 519, 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009 Kumar, 2008, Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years, Spine, 33, 2909, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818bdca7 Korovessis, 2004, Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results, Spine, 29, 735, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000112072.83196.0F Frymoyer, 1979, A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery, Spine, 4, 435, 10.1097/00007632-197909000-00008 Min, 2008, The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion, J Spinal Disord Tech, 21, 305, 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318142b960 Iguchi, 2000, Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, Spine, 25, 1754, 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00003 Hilibrand, 2004, Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?, Spine J, 4, 190S, 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007 Cardoso, 2008, Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? an in vitro human cadaveric assessment, Spine, 33, 2868, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818c63d3 Bresnahan, 2009, A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques, Spine, 34, 17, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191438b Regev, 2009, Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws: comparison of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques, Spine, 34, 1239, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2c5c Kim, 2005, Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation, Spine, 30, 123, 10.1097/01.brs.0000157172.00635.3a Battie, 2009, The twin spine study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration, Spine J, 9, 47, 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.011 Patel, 2011, Evidence for an inherited predisposition to lumbar disc disease, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, 225, 10.2106/JBJS.J.00276 Okada, 2011, Disc degeneration of cervical spine on MRI in patients with lumbar disc herniation: comparison study with asymptomatic volunteers, Eur Spine J, 20, 585, 10.1007/s00586-010-1644-y Aalto, 2006, Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review, Spine, 31, E648, 10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da Trief, 2000, A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome, Spine, 25, 2616, 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00012 Mok, 2009, Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing, Spine, 34, 832, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819f2080 Djurasovic, 2008, Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: a case-control study, Orthopedics, 31, 546, 10.3928/01477447-20080601-08 Cheh, 2007, Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up, Spine, 32, 2253, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d8e Yamashita, 2006, Five-year outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study of symptom severity at standard intervals after surgery, Spine, 31, 1484, 10.1097/01.brs.0000219940.26390.26 Sears, 2011, Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis, Spine J, 11, 11, 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.09.026 Okuda, 2004, Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF, Spine, 29, 1535, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000131417.93637.9D Lee, 2009, Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion, Eur Spine J, 18, 1637, 10.1007/s00586-009-1060-3 Ghiselli, 2004, Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A, 1497, 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00020 Throckmorton, 2003, The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion, Spine, 28, 2546, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092340.24070.F3 Yasar, 2009, Functional and clinical evaluation for the surgical treatment of degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal, J Neurosurg Spine, 11, 347, 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08692 Jonsson, 1997, A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. part II: five-year follow-up by an independent observer, Spine, 22, 2938, 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00017 Jansson, 2005, Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years–a national analysis of 9,664 operations, Eur Spine J, 14, 659, 10.1007/s00586-004-0851-9 Katz, 1996, Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, Spine, 21, 92, 10.1097/00007632-199601010-00022 Tuli, 2011, Spinaplasty following lumbar laminectomy for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis to prevent iatrogenic instability, Indian J Orthop, 45, 396, 10.4103/0019-5413.83140 Kawaguchi, 2007, Adjacent segment disease following expansive lumbar laminoplasty, Spine J, 7, 273, 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.003 Sobottke, 2010, Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer, Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 53, 179, 10.1055/s-0030-1263108 Anderson, 2011, Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes, Spine, 36, E320, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db1dfb Park, 2010, Minimally invasive muscle sparing transmuscular microdiscectomy: technique and comparison with conventional subperiosteal microdiscectomy during the early postoperative period, J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 48, 225, 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.3.225 Stevens, 2006, Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies, J Spinal Disord Tech, 19, 77, 10.1097/01.bsd.0000193820.42522.d9 Watanabe, 2011, Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study, J Neurosurg Spine, 14, 51, 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933 Kelleher, 2010, Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity, Spine, 35, E981, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c46fb4 Pellise, 2007, Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion, Spine, 32, 574, 10.1097/01.brs.0000256875.17765.e6 Levin, 2007, Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 65, 29 Axelsson, 2007, Adjacent segment hypermobility after lumbar spine fusion: no association with progressive degeneration of the segment 5 years after surgery, Acta Orthop, 78, 834, 10.1080/17453670710014635 Hambly, 1998, The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion, Spine, 23, 1785, 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00012 Penta, 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion, Spine, 20, 743, 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00018 Seitsalo, 1997, Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively: a long-term follow-up, Eur Spine J, 6, 393, 10.1007/BF01834066 Wai, 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion, Spine, 31, 1952, 10.1097/01.brs.0000228849.37321.a8 Park, 2004, Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature, Spine, 29, 1938, 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03 Aiki, 2005, Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation, J Orthop Sci, 10, 490, 10.1007/s00776-005-0919-3 Disch, 2008, Higher risk of adjacent segment degeneration after floating fusions: long-term outcome after low lumbar spine fusions, J Spinal Disord Tech, 21, 79, 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577259 Katz, 1997, Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes, Spine, 22, 1123, 10.1097/00007632-199705150-00012 Ekman, 2009, A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration, Eur Spine J, 18, 1175, 10.1007/s00586-009-0947-3 Kornblum, 2004, Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis, Spine, 29, 726, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000119398.22620.92 Katz, 1999, Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, Spine, 24, 2229, 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00010 Jansson, 2003, Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987-1999, Eur Spine J, 12, 535, 10.1007/s00586-003-0544-9 Yamashita, 2006, Patient satisfaction as an outcome measure after surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: testing the validity and discriminative ability in terms of symptoms and functional status, Spine, 31, 2602, 10.1097/01.brs.0000240717.25787.7d Jonsson, 1996, Outcome after limited posterior surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine metastases, Eur Spine J, 5, 36, 10.1007/BF00307825 Katz, 1991, The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 73, 809, 10.2106/00004623-199173060-00003 Yamashita, 2003, Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, Spine, 28, 2477, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090888.63860.4F Malter, 1998, 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery, Spine, 23, 814, 10.1097/00007632-199804010-00015 Bae, 2010, Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 3 years of follow-up, Neurosurgery, 67, 1600, 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f91697 Gillet, 2003, The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion, J Spinal Disord Tech, 16, 338, 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00005 Deyo, 2011, Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, 1979, 10.2106/JBJS.J.01292 Abdu, 2009, Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome? four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial, Spine, 34, 2351, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a829 Videbaek, 2010, Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion: the impact of anterior column support: a randomized clinical trial with an eight- to thirteen-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up, Spine, 35, 1955, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e57269 Anandjiwala, 2011, Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up, Eur Spine J, 20, 1951, 10.1007/s00586-011-1917-0 Videbaek, 2011, Sagittal spinal balance after lumbar spinal fusion: the impact of anterior column support results from a randomized clinical trial with an eight- to thirteen-year radiographic follow-up, Spine, 36, 183, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc8fce Liao, 2011, Surgical outcomes of degenerative spondylolisthesis with L5-S1 disc degeneration: comparison between lumbar floating fusion and lumbosacral fusion at a minimum 5-year follow-up, Spine, 36, 1600, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f99e11 Zencica, 2010, Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis, Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 77, 124, 10.55095/achot2010/023 Green, 2011, Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Spine, 36, 1948, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff1ea9 Luhmann, 2009, Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis, Spine, 34, 2191, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a Cho, 2008, Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis, Eur Spine J, 17, 650, 10.1007/s00586-008-0615-z Chen, 2011, Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes, Eur Spine J, 20, 1946, 10.1007/s00586-011-1888-1 Yu, 2011, Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level PLIF: comparison between spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis, Asian Spine J, 5, 82, 10.4184/asj.2011.5.2.82 Hwang, 2009, Radiographic progression of degenerative lumbar scoliosis after short segment decompression and fusion, Asian Spine J, 3, 58, 10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.58 Korovessis, 2010, Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis, Spine, 35, 898, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d51e84 Kaito, 2010, Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space, J Neurosurg Spine, 12, 671, 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE08823 Kaito, 2011, Disc space distraction is a potent risk factor for adjacent disc disease after PLIF, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 131, 1499, 10.1007/s00402-011-1343-0 Kim, 2006, An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis?, Spine, 31, 2343, 10.1097/01.brs.0000238970.67552.f5 Kim, 2006, Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis, Spine, 31, 2359, 10.1097/01.brs.0000238969.59928.73 Schwab, 2009, Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient, Spine, 34, 1828, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08 Jawahar, 2010, Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials, Spine J, 10, 1043, 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.014 Botelho, 2010, A systematic review of randomized trials on the effect of cervical disc arthroplasty on reducing adjacent-level degeneration, Neurosurg Focus, 28, E5, 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1032 Guyer, 2009, Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up, Spine J, 9, 374, 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007 Sasso, 2008, Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: Initial results for treatment of discogenic pain, Spine, 33, 123, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816043af Zigler, 2007, Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease, Spine, 32, 1155, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 Gornet, 2011, Lumbar disc arthroplasty with MAVERICK disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial, Spine, 36, E1600, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318217668f Kanayama, 2009, Motion-preserving surgery can prevent early breakdown of adjacent segments: comparison of posterior dynamic stabilization with spinal fusion, J Spinal Disord Tech, 22, 463, 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181934512 Schaeren, 2008, Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization, Spine, 33, E636, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d2435 Heo, 2011, Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws and a nitinol spring rod system with 2-year minimum follow-up, J Spinal Disord Tech, 25, 509