Reduction of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice by activation of the retinoid X receptor

Thierry Claudel1, Mark D. Leibowitz1, Catherine Fiévet1, Anne Tailleux1, Brandee Wagner1, Joyce J. Repa1,2, Gérard Torpier1, Jean‐Marc A. Lobaccaro1, James R. Paterniti1, David J. Mangelsdorf3,1, Richard A. Heyman1, Johan Auwerx1,4
1Département d'Athérosclérose, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherché Médicale (INSERM) U325, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 59019 Lille, France; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA 92121; X-Ceptor Therapeutics, San Diego, CA 92121; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9050; and Institut de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherché Scientifique/INSERM/Université Louis Pasteur, 67404...
2Physiology
3Biochemistry,
4Universite de Strasbourg

Tóm tắt

A common feature of many metabolic pathways is their control by retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimers. Dysregulation of such metabolic pathways can lead to the development of atherosclerosis, a disease influenced by both systemic and local factors. Here we analyzed the effects of activation of RXR and some of its heterodimers in apolipoprotein E −/− mice, a well established animal model of atherosclerosis. An RXR agonist drastically reduced the development of atherosclerosis. In addition, a ligand for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ and a dual agonist of both PPARα and PPARγ had moderate inhibitory effects. Both RXR and liver X receptor (LXR) agonists induced ATP-binding cassette protein 1 (ABC-1) expression and stimulated ABC-1-mediated cholesterol efflux from macrophages from wild-type, but not from LXRα and β double −/−, mice. Hence, activation of ABC-1-mediated cholesterol efflux by the RXR/LXR heterodimer might contribute to the beneficial effects of rexinoids on atherosclerosis and warrant further evaluation of RXR/LXR agonists in prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0092-8674(95)90200-7

10.1016/0092-8674(95)90202-3

10.1182/blood.V90.9.3345

10.1038/386407a0

10.1074/jbc.272.43.27307

10.1073/pnas.96.20.11358

10.1016/0092-8674(92)90362-G

10.1126/science.1411543

10.1161/01.ATV.14.1.133

10.1161/01.ATV.14.1.141

10.1161/01.ATV.13.1.1

10.1073/pnas.95.13.7614

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81575-5

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65540-X

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81574-3

10.1038/34178

10.1038/34184

P R Colville-Nash, S S Qureshi, D Willis, D A Willoughby J Immunol 161, 978–984 (1998).

10.1161/01.CIR.101.3.235

10.1161/01.RES.83.11.1097

10.1172/JCI10370

10.1210/jcem.83.5.4932

10.1038/384039a0

10.1124/mol.59.2.170

10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00918.x

10.1016/S0958-1669(99)00031-2

10.1074/jbc.275.19.14700

10.1074/jbc.M003337200

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81432-4

10.1126/science.289.5484.1524

10.1161/01.ATV.20.3.721

10.1038/387414a0

10.1073/pnas.94.23.12610

10.1002/1097-0142(19910315)67:6<1556::AID-CNCR2820670616>3.0.CO;2-O

M T Cantorna, F E Nashold, C E Hayes J Immunol 152, 1515–1522 (1994).

10.1002/jlb.55.3.336

10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb17159.x

10.1161/01.CIR.93.10.1886