The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions

Research Policy - Tập 34 - Trang 1491-1510 - 2005
Adrian Smith1, Andy Stirling1, Frans Berkhout1,2
1SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research, Freeman Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QE, UK
2IVM, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081-1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bachrach, 1970 Berkhout, 2002, Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment, Global Environmental Change, 12, 1, 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00025-5 Berkhout, 2004, Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts Boehmer-Christiansen, 1990 2000 Christiansen, 1997 Conford, 2001 Dahl, 1957, The concept of power, Behavioural Science, 2, 201, 10.1002/bs.3830020303 Dupre, 2003 Dosi, 1988, The nature of the innovative process Folke, 2002 Foucault, 1977 Freeman, 2001 Geels, 2002 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and case study, Research Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to sociotechnical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Research Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 Giddens, 1984 Glynn, 2002, Constructing a selection environment: competing expectations for CFC alternatives, Research Policy, 31, 935, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00169-X Gipe, 1995 Gowing, 1974 Hajer, 1995 Hand, M., Southerton, D., Shove, E., 2003. Explaining daily showering: a discussion of policy and practice, ESRC Sustainable Technologies Programme Working Paper 2003/4, June. Hoogma, 2002 Hughes, 1983 International Energy Agency (IEA), 2001. Putting Carbon Back in the Ground. Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Paris. IPCC, 2001a. Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. IPCC, 2001b. Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Islas, 1997, Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: the example of the gas turbine, Research Policy, 26, 49, 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00912-2 Jacobsson, 2003 Jacobsson, 2000, The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key areas for research, Energy Policy, 28, 625, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0 John, 1998 Jordan, 2000, Greening’ the European Union: what can be learned from the ‘Leaders’ of EU environmental policy, European Environment, 10, 109, 10.1002/1099-0976(200005/06)10:3<109::AID-EET227>3.0.CO;2-Z Kemp, 2001, Constructing transition paths through the management of niches, 269 Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of Strategic Niche Management, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 Leiss, 1978 Lovelock, 1987 Lukes, 1974 Margulis, L., 1998. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution, Basic Books. Marsh, 1992 Maynard-Smith, 1982 North, 1990 Rhodes, 1981 Rifkin, 2002 Rip, 1992, A quasi-evolutionary model of technological development and a cognitive approach to technology policy, Rivista de Studi Epistemologici e Sociali Sulla Scienza e la Tecnologia, 2, 69 Rip, 1998, Technological change Rosenberg, 1994 Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 Schot, 1992, The policy relevance of the quasi-evolutionary model: the case of stimulating clean technologies Schot, 1994, Strategies for shifting technological systems: the case of the automobile, Futures, 26, 1060, 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6 Smith, 2000, Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: explaining policy change and stability in UK industrial pollution policy?, Environment and Planning C, 18, 95, 10.1068/c9810j Stirling, 2004, Opening up or closing down: analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology Stoker, 1998, Governance as theory: five propositions, International Social Science Journal, 50, 17, 10.1111/1468-2451.00106 Van Lente, 1998, Expectations in technological developments: an example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency, 195 Wilks, 1987 Wood, 2003