Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data
Tóm tắt
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become a useful method of fabrication for many clinical applications. It is also a technique that is becoming increasingly accessible, as the price of the necessary tools and supplies decline. One emerging, and unreported, application for 3D printing is to aid in the visualization of 3D imaging data by creating physical models of select structures of interest. Presented here are three physical models that were fabricated from three different 3D microscopy datasets. Different methods of fabrication and imaging techniques were used in each case. Each model is presented in detail. This includes the imaging modality used to capture the raw data, the software used to create any computer models and the 3D printing tools used to create each model. Despite the differences in their creation, these examples follow a simple common workflow that is also detailed. Following these approaches, one can easily make 3D printed models from 3D microscopy datasets utilizing off the shelf commercially available software and hardware.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, et al. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. RadioGraphics. 2015;35:1965–88. doi:10.1148/rg.2015140320.
Matsumoto JS, Morris JM, Foley TA, et al. Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at Mayo Clinic. RadioGraphics. 2015;35:1989–2006. doi:10.1148/rg.2015140260.
Anwar S, Singh GK, Varughese J, et al. 3D printing in complex congenital heart disease: across a spectrum of age, pathology, and imaging techniques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.013.
Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJ, Whitesides GM. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem. 1998;70:4974–84. doi:10.1021/ac980656z.
Bull G, Chiu J, Berry R, et al. Advancing children’s engineering through desktop manufacturing. In: Spector JM, Merrill MD, Elen J, Bishop MJ, editors. Res. Educ. Commun. Technol. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 675–88.
Karapatis NP, van Griethuysen JPS, Glardon R. Direct rapid tooling: a review of current research. Rapid Prototyp J. 1998;4:77–89. doi:10.1108/13552549810210248.
Herman T, Morris J, Colton S, et al. Tactile teaching: exploring protein structure/function using physical models*. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006;34:247–54. doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042649.
Giannopoulos AA, Steigner ML, George E, et al. Cardiothoracic applications of 3-dimensional printing. J Thorac Imaging. 2016;31:253–72. doi:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000217.
Giannopoulos AA, Mitsouras D, Yoo S-J, et al. Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:701–18. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2016.170.
Pearce JM, Blair CM, Laciak KJ, et al. 3-D printing of open source appropriate technologies for self-directed sustainable development. J Sustain Dev. 2010;3:17. doi:10.5539/jsd.v3n4p17.
Amos WB, White JG. How the confocal laser scanning microscope entered biological research. Biol Cell. 2003;95:335–42.
Williams RM, Piston DW, Webb WW. Two-photon molecular excitation provides intrinsic 3-dimensional resolution for laser-based microscopy and microphotochemistry. FASEB J. 1994;8:804–13.
Wong MD, Dazai J, Walls JR, et al. Design and implementation of a custom built optical projection tomography system. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73491. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073491.
Mastronarde DN. Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. J Struct Biol. 1997;120:343–52. doi:10.1006/jsbi.1997.3919.
Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science. 1990;248:73–6.
Mohler WA, Simske JS, Williams-Masson EM, et al. Dynamics and ultrastructure of developmental cell fusions in the Caenorhabditis elegans hypodermis. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1087–90.
Reyes FC, Chung T, Holding D, et al. Delivery of prolamins to the protein storage vacuole in maize aleurone cells[W]. Plant Cell. 2011;23:769–84. doi:10.1105/tpc.110.082156.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019.
Linkert M, Rueden CT, Allan C, et al. Metadata matters: access to image data in the real world. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:777–82. doi:10.1083/jcb.201004104.
Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:71–6. doi:10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013.
Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. 1986.
Crump SS. Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. 1992.
Kimble, J. and Seidel, H., C. elegans germline stem cells and their niche (November 15, 2013), StemBook, ed. The Stem Cell Research Community, StemBook, doi/10.3824/stembook.1.95.1.
Lu F-M, Eliceiri KW, Squirrell JM, et al. Student learning of early embryonic development via the utilization of research resources from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008;7:64–73. doi:10.1187/cbe.07-09-0066.
Wallace CS, Tsoi MY, Calkin J, Darley M. Learning from inquiry-based laboratories in nonmajor biology: an interpretive study of the relationships among inquiry experience, epistemologies, and conceptual growth. J Res Sci Teach. 2003;40:986–1024. doi:10.1002/tea.10127.