A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews - Tập 42 - Trang 690-699 - 2015
D. Divya1, L.R. Gopinath1, P. Merlin Christy1
1Department of Biotechnology, Vivekanandha College of Arts and Sciences for Women, Tiruchengode, Namakkal-637205, Tamil Nadu, India

Tài liệu tham khảo

Joseph, 2011, Sustainable energy resources from chicken, Asia J Appl Sci, 4, 355, 10.3923/ajaps.2011.355.361 Mwirigi J, Balana B, Mugisha J, Walekhwa P, Melamu R, Nakami S, et al. Socio-economic hurdles to widespread adoption of small-scale biogas digesters in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review, Biom Bioener 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02〉; 2014.018: Article in press. International Energy Agency – IEA. World Energy Outlook: Paris; 2006. Madlener, 2009, Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multicriteria and data envelopment analysis, Eur J Oper Res, 197, 1084, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.051 Oyewole, 2010, Biogas production from chicken droppings, Sci Wor J, 5, 11 Chaiprasert, 2011, Biogas production from agricultural wastes in Thailand, J Sustain Energ Environ, 63 Okonko, 2009, Utilization of food wastes for sustainable development, Electro J Environ Agr Food Chem, 8, 263 Ward, 2008, Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources, Bioresour Technol, 99, 7928, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044 Uckun Kiran, 2014, Bioconversion of food waste to energy: A review, Fuel, 134, 389, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.074 Sagagi, 2009, Studies on biogas production from fruits and vegetable waste, Bay J Pure Appl Sci, 2, 115 Zhu, 2010, Pretreatment of woody biomass for biofuel production: energy efficiency, technologies, and recalcitrance, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 87, 847, 10.1007/s00253-010-2654-8 Perez, 2002, Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin: an overview, Int Microbiol, 5, 53, 10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3 Singh, 2014, A review on delignification of lignocellulosic biomass for enhancement of ethanol production potential, Renew Sustain Energ Rev, 32, 713, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.051 Naik L, Gebreegziabher Z, Tumwesige V, Balana B, Mwirigi J, Austin G. Factors determining the stability and productivity of small scale anaerobic digesters, Biom Bioener 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.055〉;2014 Article in press. Zeshan, 2012, Effect of C/N ratio and ammonia-N accumulation in a pilot-scale thermophillic dry anaerobic digester, Bioresource Technol, 113, 294, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.028 Parawira, 2008, Energy production from agricultural residues: high methane yield in pilot-scale two-stage anaerobic digestion, Biom Bioenerg, 32, 44, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.003 Schnurer, 2010, Microbiological handbook for biogas plants. Swedish waste management U2009:03, Swedish Gas Centre Report 207, Avfall Sverige Development Buswell, 1952, Mechanism of methane fermentation, Ind Eng Chem, 44, 550, 10.1021/ie50507a033 Chandra, 2006, Subbarao PMV. A study on biogas generation from non-edible oil seed cakes, Potential and Prospects in India. The 2nd Joint International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE) Dhanya, 2009, Lata. Biogas potentiality of agro-wastes – Jatropha fruit coat, Int J Civil Environ Eng, 1, 136 Pualchamy, 2008, A preliminary study on co-digestion of ossein industry waste for methane production, Eur Asia J Biosci, 2, 110 Ofoefule, 2010, Biogas production from paper waste and its blend with cow dung, Advan Appl Sci Res, 1, 1 Harold, 2007, Alternative energy sources-Biogas production. London swine conference- today׳s challenges, Tomorrow׳s Opportunities, 3–4, 119 Uzodinma, 2009, Biogas production from blends of field grss (Panicum maximum) with some animal wastes, Int J Phy Sci, 4, 091 Iyagba, 2009, The study of cow dung as co-substrate with rice husk in biogas production, Sci Res Ess, 4, 861 Vivekanandan, 2011, The study of biogas production from rice chaff (karukka) as co-substrate with cow dung, Ind J Sci Technol, 4, 657, 10.17485/ijst/2011/v4i6.14 Bagudo, 2011, The qualitative evaluation of biogas samples generated from selected organic wastes, Arch Appl Sci Res, 3, 549 Mtui, 2009, Recent advances in pretreatment of lignocelluloses wastes and production of value added products, Afr J Biotechnol, 8, 1398 Taherzadeh, 2008, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic waste to improve ethanol and biogas production, Int J Mol Sci, 9, 1621, 10.3390/ijms9091621 Sheeman, 1999, Enzymes, energy and the environment: A strategic perspective on the U.S. department of energy׳s research and development activities for bioethanol, Biotechnol Prog, 15, 817, 10.1021/bp990110d Song, 2012, Comparison of two chemical pretreatments of rice straw for biogas production by anaerobic digestion. “Pretreatment for biogas”, Bioresource, 7, 3223, 10.15376/biores.7.3.3223-3236 Divya, 2014, Merlin Christy P. A review on trends issues and prospects for biogas production in developing countries, Int Res J Environ Sci, 3, 62 Saratale, 2008, Outlook of biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic feedstock using dark fermentation- a review, J Sci Ind Res, 67, 962 Cesaro, 2014, Pretreatment methods to improve anaerobic biodegradability of organic municipal solid waste fractions, Chem Eng J, 240, 24, 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.055 Phutela, 2011, Fungal degradation of paddy straw for enhancing biogas production, Ind J Sci Technol, 4, 660, 10.17485/ijst/2011/v4i6.17 Taseli, 2008, Fungal treatment of hemp-based pulp and paper mill wastes, Afr J Biotechnol, 7, 286 Shi, 2008, Microbial pretreatment of cotton stalks by solid state cultivation of Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Bioresource Technol, 99, 6556, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.069 Sedlak, 2004, Production of ethanol from cellulosic biomass hydrolysates using genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast capable of cofermenting glucose and xylose, J App Biochem Biotechnol, 114, 403, 10.1385/ABAB:114:1-3:403 Jarboe, 2007, Development of ethanologenic bacteria, Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 108, 237 Peterson, 2008, Anaerobic respiration in engineered Escherichia coli with an internal electron acceptor to produce fuel ethanol, Ann NY Acad Sci, 1125, 363, 10.1196/annals.1419.020 Eze, 2010, Studies on the microbial spectrum in anaerobic biomethannization of cow dung in 10m3 fixed dome biogas digester, Int J Phy Sci, 5, 1331 Sunarso, Johari, 2010, The effect of feed to inoculums ratio on biogas production rate from cattle manure using rumen fluid as inoculums, Int J Sci Eng, 1, 41 Gomathi, 2009, Methane emission by gut symbionts of Termites, Acad J Plant Sci, 2, 189 Budiyono, 2010, The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode, Int J Chem Biol Eng, 3, 39 Mirdamadian, 2011, Reduce of fermentation time in composting process by using a special microbial consortium, World Acad Sci Eng Technol, 76, 533 Rother, 2005, Genetic technologies for Archaea, Curr Opin Microbiol, 8, 745, 10.1016/j.mib.2005.10.010 Senthilkumar, 2005, Bioethanol production from cellulosic substrates: Engineered bacteria and process integration challenges, J Sci Ind Res, 64, 845 Whiteley, 2006, Enzyme technology and biological remediation, Enzyme Microb Tech, 38, 291, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.010 Binod, 2008, Industrial enzymes, 291 Merlin Christy, 2014, A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms, Renew Sustain Energ Rev, 34, 167, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.010 Parawira, 2011, Enzyme research and applications in biotechnological intensification of biogas production, Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2011, 1 Barber, 2001, 1 Romano, 2009, The effect of enzyme addition on anaerobic digestion of Jose tall wheat grass, Bioresource Technol, 100, 4564, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.065 Hendriks, 2009, Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass, Bioresource Technol, 100, 10, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027 Plochl, 2009, Hydrolytic enzymes improve fluidity of biogas feedstock, Agr Eng Int: CIGR EJ, 1529, 9(b) Abdelnasser, 2007, Isolation and identification of new cellulases producing thermophilic bacteria from an Egyptian hot spring and some properties of the crude enzyme, Aust J Bas Appl Sci, 1, 473 Schafer, 2006, Industrial enzymes, Advan Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 105, 59 Padmavathi, 2011, Isolation, identification and optimization of xylanase enzyme produced by Aspergillus niger under submerged fermention, J Microbiol Biotechnol Res, 1, 137 Kwietniewska, 2014, Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation, Renew Sustain Energ Rev, 34, 491, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.041 Ezekoye, 2009, Studies on the influence of rice on husk on biomethanation: 1. Optimal condition for digestion and the domestic use of stored biogas, Pac J Sci Technol, 10, 889 Uzodinma, 2007, Optimum mesophilic temperature of biogas production from blends of agro-industrial wastes, Trends Appl Sci Res, 2, 554, 10.3923/tasr.2007.554.558 Shanableh, 2005, Enhancement of biogas production from biomass using hydrothermal conditioning and partial oxidation, Uni Sharj J Pure Appl Sci, 2, 59 Veeken, 2000, Effect of pH and VFA on hydrolysis of organic solid waste, J Environ Eng, 126, 1076, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:12(1076) Schlegel, 2008, Essential technicalparameters for effective biogas production. Agron Res, 6(Special issue), 341 Nagao, 2012, Maximum organic loading rate for the single-stage wet anaerobic digestion of food waste, Bioresource Technol, 118, 210, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.045 Lyberatos, 1999, Skiadas IV. Modelling of anaerobic digestion – a review. Global nest, Int J, 1, 63 Bouallagui, 2004, Two-phases anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: bioreactors performance, Biochem Eng J, 21, 193, 10.1016/j.bej.2004.05.001 Okudoh, 2014, The potential of cassava biomass and applicable technologies for sustainable biogas production in South Africa: a review, Renew Sustain Energ Rev, 39, 1035, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.142 Olugasa, 2014, Energy production from biogas: A conceptual review for use in Nigeria, Renew Sustain Energ Rev, 32, 770, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.013 Nasr, 2012, Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for the treatment of thin stillage, Bioresource Technol, 111, 122, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.019