ACR RADPEER Committee White Paper with 2016 Updates: Revised Scoring System, New Classifications, Self-Review, and Subspecialized Reports

Journal of the American College of Radiology - Tập 14 - Trang 1080-1086 - 2017
Shlomit Goldberg-Stein1, L. Alexandre Frigini2, Scott Long3, Zeyad Metwalli2,4, Xuan V. Nguyen5, Mark Parker6, Hani Abujudeh7
1Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein, College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
2Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
3Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
4Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
5Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
6Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia,
7Cooper University Hospital of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey

Tài liệu tham khảo

1999 2015 Halstead, 2004, Radiology PEER review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care, J Am Coll Radiol, 1, 984, 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.005 Borgstede, 2004, RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates, J Am Coll Radiol, 1, 59, 10.1016/S1546-1440(03)00002-4 2012 Berlin, 2007, Radiologic errors: acceptable practice or malpractice, In Pract, 1, 5 Siegle, 1998, Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals, Acad Radiol, 5, 148, 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80277-8 Edwards, 2009, Peer review: a new tool for quality improvement, Physician Exec, 35, 54 Jackson, 2009, RADPEERTM scoring white paper, J Am Coll Radiol, 6, 21, 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.011 Altman, 2004, Improving patient safety-five years after the IOM report, N Engl Med, 351, 2041, 10.1056/NEJMp048243 Loreto, 2014, Survey of radiologist attitudes and perceptions regarding the incorporation of a departmental PEER review system, J Am Coll Radiol, 11, 1034, 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.04.015 Abujudeh, 2014, RADPEER PEER review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward, J Am Coll Radiol, 11, 899, 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004 Fotenos, 2012, What are your goals for peer review? A framework for understanding different methods, J Am Coll Radiol, 9, 929, 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.08.005 Larson, 2011, Getting the most out of RADPEERTM, J Am Coll Radiol, 8, 543, 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.12.018 Berlin, 1980, Malpractice and radiologists, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 135, 587, 10.2214/ajr.135.3.587 Berlin, 1986, Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11.5-year perspective, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 147, 1291, 10.2214/ajr.147.6.1291 Berlin, 1995, Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 165, 781, 10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676967 Berlin, 1998, Perceptual errors and negligence, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 170, 863, 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530024 Renfrew, 1992, Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference, Radiology, 183, 145, 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549661 Fitzgerald, 2001, Error in radiology, Clin Radiol, 56, 938, 10.1053/crad.2001.0858 Whang, 2013, The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States, Radiology, 266, 548, 10.1148/radiol.12111119 Brenner, 1998, Radiology and medical malpractice claims: a report of the practice standards claims survey of the Physician Insurers Association of America and the American College of Radiology, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 171, 19, 10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648756 Larson, 2017, Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: answering the call of the institute of medicine report on diagnostic error, Radiology, 282, 1