Laser-assisted lipolysis in the treatment of gynecomastia: a prospective study in 28 patients

Lasers in Medical Science - Tập 28 - Trang 375-382 - 2012
M. A. Trelles1, S. R. Mordon2, E. Bonanad1, J. Moreno Moraga3, A. Heckmann4, F. Unglaub5, N. Betrouni2, F. M. Leclère2
1Instituto Médico Vilafortuny, Fundación Antoni de Gimbernat, Tarragona, Spain
2INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research) U703, Lille University Hospital, Lille-Loos, France
3Instituto Médico Láser, Madrid, Spain
4Department. of Plastic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
5Department of Handsurgery, Vulpiusklinik, Bad Rappenau, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Gynecomastia is the most common breast pathology. Numerous excisions and liposuction techniques have been described to correct bilateral male breast enlargement. Recently, there has been a shift from the open approach to minimally invasive techniques. This article reports a 5-year experience using laser-assisted lipolysis (LAL) to treat gynecomastia, and describes the surgical technique. Between January 2006 and December 2010, a total of 28 patients with bilateral gynecomastia were treated with LAL. Patients had a mean age of 36.5 years (range 24 to 56 years). LAL was performed with a 980-nm diode laser (continuous emission, 15 W power, 8–12 kJ total energy per breast) after tumescent anesthetic infiltration. The breast was evaluated objectively by two physicians who compared chest circumference and photographs. Patients were also asked to score the results using a visual analogue scale: 75 to 100 (very good), 50–74 (good), 25 to 49 (fair) and 0 to 24 (poor). The postoperative period for all patients was incident-free. After 6 months, 18 patients (64.3%) scored the results as “very good”, 6 as “good” (21.4%), 3 as “fair” (10.7%) and 1 “poor” (3.6%). Mean chest circumferences pre- and postoperatively were, respectively, 117.4 ± 11.1 cm and 103.3 ± 7.5 cm (p < 0.001), corresponding to a mean difference of 14.1 cm. Physicians scored the photographs as “very good” in 22 patients (78.6%), as “good” in five patients (17.9%), and as “fair” in one patient (3.6%). LAL in gynecomastia is safe and produces significant effects on fatty tissue, with a reduction in breast volume, together with significant skin tightening. Provided an appropriate amount of energy is delivered by an experienced operator, the results are both significant and consistent.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aegineta P (1847) The seven books of Paulus Aegineta, 46. Vol 2,Book 4. Sydenham Society, London, pp 334–335 Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:48–56 Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Krenkel JM, Adams WP (2003) Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:909–923 Cordova A, Moschella F (2008) Algorithm for clinical evaluation and surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:41–49 Datta G, Cravero L, Margara A, Boriani F, Bocchiotti MA, Kefalas N (2006) The plastic surgeon in the treatment of obesity. Obes Surg 16:5–11 Eriksson S (1999) Male reduction mammaplasty after vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg 9:499–501 Altinli E, Gorgun E, Karabicak I, Uras C, Unal H, Akcal T (2002) Anthropometric measurements in male breast cancer. Obes Surg 12:869–870 Petty PM, Solomon M, Buchel EW, Tran NV (2010) Gynecomastia: evolving paradigm of management and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1301–1308 Apfelberg DB (1996) Results of multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. Clin Plast Surg 23:713–719 Klein JA (1993) Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large-volume liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1085–1098 Colombo-Benkmann M, Buse B, Stern J, Herfarth C (1998) Surgical therapy of gynecomastia and its results. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongress 115:1282–1284 Gikas P, MokBel K (2007) Management of gynecomastia: an update. Int J Clin Pract 61:1209–1215 Teimourian B, Perlman R (1983) Surgery for gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 7:155–157 Eaves FF, Bostwick J, Nahai F (1995) Endoscopic techniques in aesthetic breast surgery: augmentation, mastectomy, biopsy, capsulotomy, capsulorrhaphy, reduction, matopexy and reconstructive techniques. Clin Plast Surg 22:683–695 Badin A, Moraes L, Gondek L, Chiaratti MG, Canta L (2002) Laser lipolysis: flaccidity under control. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:335–339 Reynaud JP, Skibinski M, Wassmer B, Rochon P, Mordon S (2009) Lipolysis using a 980-nm diode laser: a retrospective analysis of 534 procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:28–36 Kim KH, Geronemus RG (2006) Laser lipolysis using a novel 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 32:241–248 Courtiss EH (1987) Gynecomastia: analysis of 159 patients and current recommendations for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:740–750 Lista F, Ahmad J (2008) Power-assisted liposuction and the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:740–747 Ichikawa K, Taninio R, Wakaki M (2006) Histologic and photonic evaluation of a pulsed Nd:YAG laser for ablation of subcutaneous adipose tissue. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 31:136–140 Mordon S, Eymard-Maurin AF, Wassmer B, Ringot J (2007) Histologic evaluation of laser lipolysis: Pulsed 1,064 nm ND:YAG laser versus CW 980 nm diode laser. Aesthetic Surg J 27:263–268 Badin AZ, Gondek LB, Garcia MJ, Valle LC, Flizikowski FB, de Noronha L (2005) Analysis of laser lipolysis effects on human tissue samples obtained from liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:281–286 Goldman A (2006) Submental Nd:YAG laser-assisted liposuction. Lasers Surg Med 38:181–184 Mordon S, Assmer B, Rochon P, Desmyttere J, Grard C, Stalnikiewicz G, Reynaud JP (2009) Serum lipid changes following laser lipolysis. J Cosmet Laser Ther 11:74–77 Trelles MA, Rigau J, Pardo L, Garcia-Solana L (1999) Electron microscopy comparison of C02 laser flash scanning and pulse technology one year after skin resurfacing. Int J Dermatol 38:58–64 Trelles MA, Pardo L, Rigau J, Garcia L (1998) Rapid healing after skin laser resurfacing: a minimal mechanical trauma technique. Ann Plast Surg 41:332–335 Moreno-Moraga J, Royo J (2010) Our experience treating 500 lipodystrophic areas with a 924/975 nm laser, a new device that induces lipolysis and heating of the dermis and fibrous septa of fatty tissue. J Clin Dermatol 9:1–11 Hammond DC (2010) Surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:61–68 Leclère FM, Spies M, Gohritz A, Vogt PM (2008) Gynecomastia, its etiologies and its surgical management: a difference between bilateral and unilateral cases? Ann Chir Plast Esthet 53:255–261 Muccini JA, O’Donnell FE, Fuller T, Reinish L (1998) Laser treatment of solar elastosis with epithelial preservation. Lasers Surg Med 23:121–127 Mordon S, Capon A, Creusy C, Fleurisse L, Buys B, Faucheux M, Servell P (2000) In vivo experimental evaluation of skin remodelling by using an Er:Glass laser with contact cooling. Lasers Surg Med 27:1–9