Contextual effects of social integration and disintegration on health status: evidence from South Korea

BMC Public Health - Tập 20 - Trang 1-9 - 2020
Eun-Bi Jo1, Rang Hee Kwon1, Minsoo Jung1,2
1Department of Health Science, College of Natural Science, Dongduk Women’s University, Seoul, South Korea
2Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA

Tóm tắt

Many studies have shown that various social integration variables represented by social capital are beneficial to communities, including collective health. However, the rapid decline in fertility rates and the breakup of familyism in developed countries require a new approach to social disintegration, but the literature is insufficient. Here, we explored the contextual effects of social integration and social disintegration on the health of individuals. The research data consist of merged datasets of 6909 respondents who were quota-sampled by approximately 30 people from 229 local governments in Korea. The individual-level independent variable is a social integration measure consisting of 26 questions in four areas. The community-level independent variables are five integral and aggregate variables extracted from 81 indicators. The dependent variable is self-rated health status. Potential confounders are gender, age, annual income, educational attainment, district type, and the number of beds in medical institutions per 1000 people. The results showed that at the individual level, the higher the inclusive attitude of in- and out-of-networks, after adjusting for potential confounders, the less likely the respondent belongs to the unhealthy group (p < 0.001). At the community level, the higher the proportion of single-person households in a community after adjusting for potential confounders, the less likely the respondent belongs to the unhealthy group (p < 0.05). The effect size was 0.22. Thus far, social integration has been preferred, with the positive aspects of social capital being emphasized. However, this study shows that in some cases, social disintegration can instead positively influence an individual’s health. Therefore, further studies of the various conditions of social context effects on health are necessary.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Son M, An SJ, Kim YJ. Trends of social inequalities in the specific causes of infant mortality in a nationwide birth cohort in Korea, 1995-2009. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(9):1401–14. Chung S. Causal model of low fertility determinants in Korea. J Soc Sci. 2010;49(1):69–91. Hasunuma L, Shin K. #MeToo in Japan and South Korea: #WeToo, #WithYou. J Women Politics Pol. 2019;40:97–111. Campos-Matos I, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. The ‘dark side’ of social capital: trust and self-rated health in European countries. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;26:90–5. Williams DR. Race, socioeconomic status, and health: the added effects of racism and discrimination. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:173–88. Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002;79:21S–34. Poortinga W. Social capital: An individual or collective resource for health? Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:292–302. Rostila M. Social capital and health in European welfare regimes: a multilevel approach. J Eur Soc Policy. 2017;17:223–39. Jen MH, Sund ER, Johnston R, Jones K. Trustful societies, trustful individuals, and health: An analysis of self-rated health and social trust using the world value survey. Health Place. 2010;16:1022–9. Kawachi I. Trust and population health. In: Uslaner EM, Kawachi I (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Putnam RD. E pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scand Political Stud. 2007;30:137–74. Putnam RD. Making democracy work. Civic Traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993. Rapp C, Huijts T, Eikemo TA, Stathopoulou T. Social integration and self-reported health: differences between immigrants and natives in Greece. Eur J Pub Health. 2018;28(5):48–53. Giordano GN, Lindstrom M. Trust and health: testing the reverse causality hypothesis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70:10–6. Waytz A, Epley N. Social connection enables dehumanization. J Experiment Soc Psychol. 2012;48(1):70–6. Oshio T. The association between individual-level social capital and health: cross-sectional, prospective cohort and fixed-effects models. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(1):25–30. Akçomak İS, Ter Weel B. The impact of social capital on crime: evidence from the Netherlands. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2012;42(1–2):323–40. Saegert S, Winkel G. Crime, social capital, and community participation. Am J Community Psychol. 2004;34(3–4):219–33. Takagi D, Ikeda KI, Kobayashi T, Harihara M, Kawachi I. The impact of crime on social ties and civic participation. J Community App Soc Psychol. 2016;26(2):164–78. Bühler C, Fratczak E. Learning from others and receiving support: the impact of personal networks on fertility intentions in Poland. Eur Soc. 2007;9(3):359–82. Philipov D, Spéder Z, Billari FC. Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria and Hungary. Pop Stud. 2006;60(3):289–308. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multi-level analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multi-level modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishers; 1999. Diez-Roux AV. A glossary for multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:588–94. Blakely T, Subramanian SV. Multilevel studies. In: Oakes J, Turner J, editors. Methods for social epidemiology (pp. 316-40), vol. 42. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006. Diez-Roux AV. The examination of neighborhood effects on health: conceptual and methodological issues related to the presence of multiple levels of organization. In LF Berkman, I Kawachi (Eds.), neighborhoods and health (pp. 45–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntaner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question: a meta-analysis. J Gen Int Med. 2005;20:267–75. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37. Koo HR, Jung M. Exploring regional disparities: the social quality approach. Korean Local Admin Rev. 2013;10(2):51–73. Ross CE, Jang SJ. Neighborhood disorder, fear, and mistrust: the buffering role of social ties with neighbors. Am J Community Psychol. 2000;28(4):401–20. Putnam R. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000. Jung M, Viswanath K. Does community capacity influence self-rated health? Multilevel contextual effects in Seoul. Korea Soc Sci Med. 2013;77:60–9. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277(5328):918–24. Maesen LJG, van der Walker AC. Indicators of social quality: outcomes of the European scientific network. Eur J Social Qual. 2005;5(1/2):8–24. Sachs JD. From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2206–11. Xiao Y, Norris CB, Lenzen M, Norris G, Murray J. How social footprints of nations can assist in achieving the sustainable development goals. Ecological Econ. 2017;135:55–65. Choe J. Income inequality and crime in the United States. Econ Lett. 2008;101(1):31–3. Khang YH, Cho HJ. Socioeconomic inequality in cigarette smoking: trends by gender, age, and socioeconomic position in South Korea, 1989–2003. Prev Med. 2006;42(6):415–22. Odgers CL. Income inequality and the developing child: is it all relative? Am Psychol. 2015;70(8):722. Wildman J. The impact of income inequality on individual and societal health: absolute income, relative income and statistical artefacts. Health Econ. 2001;10(4):357–61. Linden M, Ray D. Aggregation bias-correcting approach to the health–income relationship: life expectancy and GDP per capita in 148 countries, 1970–2010. Econ Model. 2017;61:126–36. Swift R. The relationship between health and GDP in OECD countries in the very long run. Health Econ. 2011;20(3):306–22. Seeman TE. Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6(5):442–51. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Wilkinson RG. Crime: Social disorganization and relative deprivation. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(6):719–31. Sampson RJ. Neighborhood-level context and health: lessons from sociology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. Jones GW. Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Pop Development Rev. 2007;33(3):453–78. Hawe P, Shiell A. Social capital and health promotion: a review. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(6):871–85. Yip W, Subramanian SV, Mitchell AD, Lee DTS, Wang J, Kawachi I. Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):35–49. Allik J, Realo A. Individualism-collectivism and social capital. J Cross-Cultural Psychol. 2004;35(1):29–49. Kagitcibasi C. Individualism and collectivism. Handbook Cross-Cultural Psychol. 1997;3:1–49. Best SJ, Krueger BS. Online interactions and social capital: distinguishing between new and existing ties. Soc Sci Computer Rev. 2006;24(4):395–410. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Computer-Mediated Communic. 2007;12(4):1143–68. Kobayashi T, Ikeda K, Miyata K. Social capital online: collective use of the internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Info Community Soc. 2006;9(5):582–611.