Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials
Tóm tắt
Event-related potentials were used to study how parsing of German relative clauses is influenced by semantic information. Subjects read well-formed sentences containing either a subject or an object relative clause and answered questions concerning the thematic roles expressed in those sentences. Half of the sentences contained past participles that on grounds of semantic plausibility biased either a subject or an object relative reading; the other half contained past participles that provided no semantic information favoring either reading. The past participle elicited an N400 component, larger in amplitude for neutral than for semantically biased verbs, but this occurred only in the case of subject relative clauses. More specific effects were obtained only for a subgroup of subjects, when these were grouped into fast and slow comprehenders on the basis of their questionanswering reaction times. Fast comprehenders showed larger N400 amplitudes for neutral than for semantically biased past participles in general and larger N400s for the latter when there was a bias for an object relative reading as opposed to a subject relative reading. Syntactic ambiguity resolution, indicated by an auxiliary in sentence final position, was associated in this subgroup with a positive component (P345), larger in amplitude for auxiliaries indicating an object relative reading than for those indicating a subject relative reading. The latter component was independent of semantically biasing information given by a preceding past participle. Implications of these findings for models of language comprehension are considered.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Altmann, G. T. M. (1989). Parsing and interpretation: An introduction.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, SI1-SI21.
Bentin, S., Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1993). Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing.Psychophysiology,30, 161–169.
Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,60, 343–355.
Chwilla, D. J., &Brunia, C. H. M. (1991). Event-related potentials to different feedback stimuli.Psychophysiology,28, 123–132.
Clifton, C., &Ferreira, F. (1987). Modularity in sentence comprehension. In J. Garfield (Ed.),Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding (pp 277–290). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clifton, C., Speer, S., &Abney, S. (1991). Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 251–271.
Damen, E. J. P., &Brunia, C. H. M. (1987). Changes in heart rate and slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task.Psychophysiology,24, 700–713.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!. . . Surprise!Psychophysiology,18, 493–513.
Donchin, E., &Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,11, 357–374.
Fischler, I., Bloom, P. A., Childers, D. G., Roucos, S. E., &Perry, N.W., Jr. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification.Psychophysiology,20, 400–409.
Fischler, I., &Raney, G. E. (1991). Language by eye: Behavioral, autonomic and cortical approaches to reading. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp 511–574). New York: Wiley.
Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1990). Parsing principles and language comprehension during reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp 345–357). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frazier, L. (1978).On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Frazier, L. (1987a). Sentence processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII (pp 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frazier, L. (1987b). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch.Natural Language & Linguistic Theory,5, 519–560.
Frazier, L. (1990). Exploring the architecture of the language processing system. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing (pp 409–433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frazier, L., &Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 331–344.
Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210.
Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics.Cognition,19, 133–166.
Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., &Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations.Cognitive Brain Research,1, 183–192.
Hagoort, P., &Brown, C. (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Perspectives on sentence processing (pp 45–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., &Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 439–483.
Hickok, G. (1993). Parallel parsing: Evidence from reactivation in garden-path sentences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,22, 239–250.
Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing.Psychophysiology,30, 47–61.
Holcomb, P. J., &Neville, H. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,5, 281–312.
Huynh, H., &Feldt, L. A. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions.Journal of the American Statistical Association,65, 1582–1589.
Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude.Psychophysiology,23, 367–384.
Johnson, R., Jr. (1992). Event-related brain potentials. In I. Litvan & Y. Agid (Eds.),Progressive supranuclear palsy: Clinical and research approaches (pp 122–154). New York: Oxford University Press.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Keppel, G. (1991).Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
King, J., &Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 580–602.
Kluender, R., &Kutas, M. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 573–633.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.Nature,307, 161–163.
Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. (1988). Event-related potential studies of language. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 139–187). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Lang, M., Lang, W., Uhl, F., Kornhuber, A., Deecke, L., &Kornhuber, H. H. (1987). Slow negative potential shifts indicating verbal cognitive learning in a concept formation task.Human Neurobiology,6, 183–190.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., &Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.Cognition,8, 1–71.
Martin, R. C. (1987). Articulatory and phonological deficits in shortterm memory and their relation to syntactic processing.Brain & Language,32, 159–192.
Martin, R. C., &Feher, E. (1990). The consequences of reduced memory span for the comprehension of semantic versus syntactic information.Brain & Language,38, 1–20.
Mecklinger, A., Kramer, A. F., &Strayer, D. L. (1992). Eventrelated potentials and EEG components in a semantic memory search task.Psychophysiology,29, 104–119.
Mecklinger, A., &Ullsperger, P. (1993). P300 varies with stimulus categorization rather than probability.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,86, 395–407.
Mitchell, D. C., Corley, M. M. B., &Garnham, A. (1992). Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse based proposal mechanism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 69–88.
Münte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., &Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociations in brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 335–344.
Neville, H. J., Mills, D. L., &Lawson, D. L. (1992). Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods.Cerebral Cortex,2, 244–258.
Neville, H. J., Nicol, J., Barss, A., Forster, K., &Garrett, M. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 155–170.
Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 785–804.
Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 413–437.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., &Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 786–803.
Raney, G. E. (1993). Monitoring changes in cognitive load during reading: An event-related brain potential and reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 51–69.
Rayner, K., &Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 657–673.
Rösler, F. (1991). Preparation or action? Some comments on the qualities of preparatory negative potentials.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,42 (Suppl.), 116–129.
Rösler, F., Friederici, A. D., Pütz, P., &Hahne, A. (1993). Eventrelated brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 345–362.
Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Jr.,Grafman, J., Canoune, H., &Ritter, W. (1992). Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: An event-related potential study.Cognitive Brain Research,1, 53–66.
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kühn, K. (in press). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German.Journal of Memory & Language.
Shapiro, L. P., Nagel, H. N., &Levine, B. A. (1993). Preferences for a verb’s complement and their use in sentence processing.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 96–114.
Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. R. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influence of context based expectations.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 597–632.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Kello, C. (1993). Verbspecific constraints in sentence parsing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 528–553.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
Van Petten, C., &Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words.Memory & Cognition,19, 95–112.