New omega vortex identification method

Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy - Tập 59 - Trang 1-9 - 2016
ChaoQun Liu1, YiQian Wang1,2, Yong Yang1, ZhiWei Duan3
1Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, USA
2Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
3School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Tóm tắt

A new vortex identification criterion called Ω-method is proposed based on the ideas that vorticity overtakes deformation in vortex. The comparison with other vortex identification methods like Q-criterion and λ 2-method is conducted and the advantages of the new method can be summarized as follows: (1) the method is able to capture vortex well and very easy to perform; (2) the physical meaning of Ω is clear while the interpretations of iso-surface values of Q and λ 2 chosen to visualize vortices are obscure; (3) being different from Q and λ 2 iso-surface visualization which requires wildly various thresholds to capture the vortex structure properly, Ω is pretty universal and does not need much adjustment in different cases and the iso-surfaces of Ω=0.52 can always capture the vortices properly in all the cases at different time steps, which we investigated; (4) both strong and weak vortices can be captured well simultaneously while improper Q and λ 2 threshold may lead to strong vortex capture while weak vortices are lost or weak vortices are captured but strong vortices are smeared; (5) Ω=0.52 is a quantity to approximately define the vortex boundary. Note that, to calculate Ω, the length and velocity must be used in the non-dimensional form. From our direct numerical simulation, it is found that the vorticity direction is very different from the vortex rotation direction in general 3-D vortical flow, the Helmholtz velocity decomposition is reviewed and vorticity is proposed to be further decomposed to vortical vorticity and non-vortical vorticity.

Tài liệu tham khảo

P. A. Davidson, Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engi-neers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004). J. Jeong, and F. Hussain, J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69 (1995). L.D. Landau, and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon, New York, 1987), p.14. S. K. Robinson, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 23, 601 (1991). A. Perry, and M. Chong, Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 19, 125 (1987). J. Zhou, R. J. Adrian, S. Balachandar, and T. Kendall, J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353 (1999). J. C. R. Hunt, A. A. Wray, and P. Moin, in Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows: Proceedings of the Summer Program (Center for Turbulence Research, 1988), pp. 193–208. B. Pierce, P. Moin, and T. Sayadi, Phys Fluids 25, 015102 (2013). H. von Helmholtz, Phil. Mag. 33, 485 (1867). C. Liu, Y. Yan, and P. Lu, Comput & Fluids 102, 353 (2014). C. Liu, and S. Chern, in Self-contradictions of current turbulence theory and Liu’s new turbulence generation theory: New Perspectives in Fluid Dynamics, edited by C. Q. Liu and S. Chen (InTech, 2015), pp. 1–22, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61836. Y. Yan, and C. Liu, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 35, 106 (2014). Z. W. Duan, Z. X. Xiao, and S. Fu, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 2330 (2014).