Pauses and durations exhibit a serial position effect

Karl Haberlandt1, Holly Lawrence1, Lalia Krohn1, Katherine Bower1, J. Graham Thomas1
1Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford

Tóm tắt

This article reports evidence of two kinds of serial position effects in immediate serial recall: One involves interresponse pauses, and the other response durations. In forward and backward recall, responding was faster at initial and final positions than at center positions, exhibiting a bow-shaped function relative to serial position. These data were obtained in a spoken recall study in which ungrouped lists of four to six words and postcuing of recall direction were used. The pause pattern is consistent with several models of serial memory, including a distinctiveness model (Brown, Neath, & Chater, 2002) and a version of the ACT—R model augmented with a spontaneous grouping strategy (Maybery, Parmentier, & Jones, 2002). The duration pattern suggests that response articulation depends on the processing context, rather than being modular.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anders, T. R., &Lillyquist, T. D. (1971). Retrieval time in forward and backward recall.Psychonomic Science,22, 205–206.

Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Lebiere, C., &Matessa, M. (1998). An integrated theory of list memory.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 341–380.

Balota, D. A., Boland, J. E., &Shields, L. (1989). Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 14–36.

Brown, G., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002).SIMPLE: A local distinctiveness model of scale invariant memory and perceptual identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Conrad, R. (1965). Order error in immediate recall of sequences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 161–169.

Cowan, N. (1992). Verbal memory span and the timing of spoken recall.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 668–684.

Cowan, N., Keller, T., Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., McDouglas, S., &Rack, J. (1994). Verbal memory span in children: Speech timing clues to the mechanisms underlying age and word length effects.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 234–250.

Cowan, N., Wood, N., Wood, P., Keller, T., Nugent, L., &Keller, C. (1998). Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to shortterm memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 141–160.

Hulme, C., Newton, P., Cowan, N., Stuart, G., &Brown, G. (1999). Think before you speak: Pauses, memory search, and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 447–463.

Kahana, M. J., &Caplan, J. B. (2002). Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists.Memory & Cognition,30, 841–849.

Lovatt, P., Avons, S., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.

Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 360–385.

Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., &Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.),Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.

Thomas, J. G., Milner, H. R., &Haberlandt, K. (2003). Forward and backward recall: Different response time patterns, same retrieval order.Psychological Science,14, 169–174.

Wright, C. E. (1990). Controlling sequential motor activity. In D. N. Osherson, S. M. Kosslyn, & J. M. Hollerbach (Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 285–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.