The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning

Andriessen, J., Erkens, G., Laak, C.Vande, Peters, N., Coirier, P. (2003). Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing. In: J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Confronting cognitions: Arguing to learn. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Andriessen, 1999, Where is education heading and how about AI?, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130 Baker, 1994, A model for negotiation in teaching–learning dialogues, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5, 199 Baker, M. J. (1999). Argumentative interactions and cooperative learning. Escritos. Baker, M. J. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In: J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Confronting cognitions: Arguing to learn. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bell, 1997, Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups, 10 Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., O’Malley, C. O. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: E. Spada, P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. Oxford: Elsevier. Edelson, D. C., O’Neill, D. K., Gomez, L. M., D’Amico, L. (1995). A design for effective support of inquiry and collaboration. In: J. L. Schnase, E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning, October 1995. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, Nahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Erkens, 2001 Jaspers, 2000 Luttik, 1998 Paolucci, M., Suthers, D., Weiner, A. (1995). Belvédère: stimulating students’ critical discussion. CHI95 conference companion, interactive posters, May 7–11, Denver, CO (pp. 123–124). Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M. M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In: N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology. Chichester: Wiley. SCALE-team. (2002a). Teaching materials and task design for collaborative argumentation-based learning with intelligent internet tools, Deliverable 1&2, SCALE Project, IST-1999-10664. SCALE-team. (2002b). Test instruments for assessing the quality of students’ argumentation, and results on school experiments for teaching collaborative argumentation in secondary schools, Deliverable 8, SCALE Project, IST-1999-10664. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: trying to bring the classroom in world three. In: K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons, integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Stein, N.L., Bernas, R.S., Calicchia, D. (1997). Conflict talk: understanding and resolving arguments. In: T.Giron (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives (Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Stuurgroep Profiel Tweede Fase Voortgezet Onderwijs. (1994). De Tweede Fase vernieuwt. Scharnier tussen basisvorming en hoger onderwijs, deel 2. [The second phase is innovating. Hinge between lower secondary education and higher education]. Den Haag: Stuurgroep Profiel Tweede Fase Voortgezet Onderwijs. Stichting ICT op school. (2001). Vier in balans: verkenning van zaken met het oog op effectief en efficient gebruik van ICT in het onderwijs. [Four in balance: Exploration with focus on effective and efficient use of ICT in education]. Den Haag: Stichting ICT op school. Suthers, 2001, Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7, 254 Suthers, D. D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In: J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Confronting cognitions: Arguing to learn (pp. 1–17). Kluwer Academic Publisher: Netherlands. Van Bruggen, J. M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A. (2002). A cognitive framework for cooperative problem solving with argument visualization. In: P. A. Kirschner, S. J. Buckingham Shum, C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer: London. Van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. (2003). Designing external representations to support solving wicked problems. In: J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Confronting cognitions: Arguing to learn. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Veerman, 2002, Collaborative argumentation in academic education, Instructional Science, 30, 155, 10.1023/A:1015100631027 Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. Doctoral dissertation. Utrecht: Utrecht University.