Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review

Dental Materials - Tập 34 - Trang 40-57 - 2018
F. Rupp1, L. Liang1, J. Geis-Gerstorfer1, L. Scheideler1, F. Hüttig2
1University Hospital Tübingen, Section Medical Materials Science & Technology, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2Department of Prosthodontics, Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine, and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adell, 1970, Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. II. Review of clinical approaches, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 4, 19, 10.3109/02844317009038440 Albrektsson, 2005, The impact of oral implants – past and future, 1966–2042, J Can Dent Assoc, 71 Branemark, 1969, Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, 81, 10.3109/02844316909036699 Branemark, 1977, Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, 16, 1 Schroeder, 1978, The accumulation of osteocementum around a dental implant under physical loading, SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd, 88, 1051 Schulte, 1976, The Tubinger immediate implant, Quintessenz, 27, 17 Zarb GA. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Toronto conference on osseointegration in clinical dentistry; St. Louis, MO, 1983. Reprinted from the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 49 and 50, 1983; 1–84. Al-Radha, 2012, Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion, J Dent, 40, 146, 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.006 Tuna, 2015, Influence of ultraviolet photofunctionalization on the surface characteristics of zirconia-based dental implant materials, Dent Mater, 31, e14, 10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.008 Al-Radha, 2013, Essential oils and zirconia dental implant materials, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, 1497, 10.11607/jomi.3142 Kohal, 2013, Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials, Dent Mater, 29, 763, 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.003 Kohal, 2004, A zirconia implant-crown system: a case report, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 24, 147 Kohal, 2006, Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation, Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, 565, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01252.x Albrektsson, 1981, Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man, Acta Orthop Scand, 52, 155, 10.3109/17453678108991776 Rupp, 1996, Dental implant materials: surface modification and interface phenomena, Adv Mater, 8, 254, 10.1002/adma.19960080316 Fickl, 2015, Experimental peri-implantitis around different types of implants — a clinical and radiographic study in dogs, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, e661, 10.1111/cid.12303 Geckeler, 1997, Interfaces and interphases of (Bio)materials: definitions, structures, and dynamics, Adv Mater, 9, 513, 10.1002/adma.19970090614 Vogler, 1998, Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces, Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 74, 69, 10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-7 Gristina, 1987, Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration, Science, 237, 1588, 10.1126/science.3629258 Wennerberg, 2009, Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review, Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, 172, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x Andrukhov, 2016, Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness, Dent Mater, 32, 1374, 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217 Baier, 1984, Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: methods and results, J Biomed Mater Res, 18, 337, 10.1002/jbm.820180404 Kasemo, 1988, Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, 247 Baier, 1972, The role of surface energy in thrombogenesis, Bull N Y Acad Med, 48, 257 Kasemo, 1994, Material-tissue interfaces: the role of surface properties and processes, Environ Health Perspect, 102, 41 Schwartz, 1994, Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface, J Cell Biochem, 56, 340, 10.1002/jcb.240560310 Herminghaus, 2000, Roughness-induced non-wetting, Europhys Lett, 52, 165, 10.1209/epl/i2000-00418-8 Marmur, 2009, A guide to the equilibrium contact angles maze, 3 Quere, 2008, Wetting and roughness, Ann Rev Mater Res, 38, 71, 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434 Rupp, 2004, Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications, Biomaterials, 25, 1429, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.015 Rupp, 2006, Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces, J Biomed Mater Res A, 76A, 323, 10.1002/jbm.a.30518 Cassie, 1944, Wettability of porous surfaces, Trans Faraday Soc, 40, 546, 10.1039/tf9444000546 Rupp, 2014, A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: theoretical and experimental aspects, Acta Biomater, 10, 2894, 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.040 Gittens, 2013, The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells, Acta Biomater, 9, 6268, 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.002 Gittens, 2012, Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces, Biomaterials, 33, 8986, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.059 Wennerberg, 2014, Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia, Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, 1041, 10.1111/clr.12213 Wennerberg, 2013, Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces, Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, 203, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02429.x Al-Nawas, 2001, Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy, Scanning, 23, 227, 10.1002/sca.4950230401 Arvidsson, 2006, The role of functional parameters for topographical characterization of bone-anchored implants, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 8, 70, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00001.x Kournetas, 2017, Comparative evaluation of topographical data of dental implant surfaces applying optical interferometry and scanning electron microscopy, Dent Mater, 33, e317, 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.020 Sul, 2008, Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, 631 Valverde, 2013, Evaluation of surface roughness as a function of multiple blasting processing variables, Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, 238, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02392.x Al-Nawas, 2003, Three-dimensional topographic and metrologic evaluation of dental implants by confocal laser scanning microscopy, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, 176, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00200.x Jarmar, 2008, Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 10, 11, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00056.x Wennerberg, 2000, Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, 331 Hansson, 2005, The effect of limited lateral resolution in the measurement of implant surface roughness: a computer simulation, J Biomed Mater Res A, 75a, 472, 10.1002/jbm.a.30455 Anselme, 2005, Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion, Acta Biomater, 1, 211, 10.1016/j.actbio.2004.11.009 Svanborg, 2010, Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level, J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater, 92, 462 Davies, 2013, The roles of different scale ranges of surface implant topography on the stability of the bone/implant interface, Biomaterials, 34, 3535, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.024 Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Comments from the authors: F. Rupp, L., Scheideler, N., Olshanska, M. de wild, M. Wieland, and J. Geis-Gerstorfer of Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces, J Biomed Mater Res 76A: 323–334 (2006), to the Letter to the Editor of M. Morra et al. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 79A:755–757. Lundgren, 2007, Modeling of wetting: a study of nanowetting at rough and heterogeneous surfaces, Langmuir, 23, 1187, 10.1021/la060712o Rupp, 2011, Wetting behavior of dental implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 1256 Kaplan, 2013, A review of wetting versus adsorption, complexions, and related phenomena: the rosetta stone of wetting, J Mater Sci, 48, 5681, 10.1007/s10853-013-7462-y Young, 1805, An essay on the cohesion of fluids, Phil Trans Roy Soc (London), 95, 65, 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005 Morra, 2003, Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, 40 Att, 2009, The effect of UV-photofunctionalization on the time-related bioactivity of titanium and chromium-cobalt alloys, Biomaterials, 30, 4268, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.048 DePalma, 1972, Investigation of three-surface properties of several metals and their relation to blood compatibility, J Biomed Mater Res, 6, 37, 10.1002/jbm.820060406 Doundoulakis, 1987, Surface analysis of titanium after sterilization: role in implant-tissue interface and bioadhesion, J Prosthet Dent, 58, 471, 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90279-4 Baier, 1992, Radiofrequency gas plasma (glow discharge) disinfection of dental operative instruments, including handpieces, J Oral Implantol, 18, 236 Baier, 1988, Implant surface preparation, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, 9 Buser, 2004, Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface, J Dent Res, 83, 529, 10.1177/154405910408300704 Schwarz, 2009, Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants, J Biomed Mater Res B, 88B, 544, 10.1002/jbm.b.31233 Kasemo, 1988, Biomaterial and implant surfaces: on the role of cleanliness, contamination, and preparation procedures, J Biomed Mater Res, 22, 145, 10.1002/jbm.820221307 Textor, 2001, Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys, 171 Albrektsson, 2014, Is marginal bone loss around oral implants the result of a provoked foreign body reaction?, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 16, 155, 10.1111/cid.12142 Colnot, 2007, Molecular analysis of healing at a bone-implant interface, J Dent Res, 86, 862, 10.1177/154405910708600911 Duddek D, Maghaireh H, Faber F-J, Neugebauer J. SEM surface analyses of 120 sterile-packed implants. Final report of the BDIZ EDI implant study 2014/15. Clean Implant Foundation CIF GmbH, Berlin, Germany. URL: http://www.cleanimplant.com. (date: July 20, 2017). Scharnweber, 2010, How is wettability of titanium surfaces influenced by their preparation and storage conditions?, J Mater Sci Mater Med, 21, 525, 10.1007/s10856-009-3908-9 Wennerberg, 2011, Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface, Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 3, 59, 10.2147/CCIDE.S15949 Hori, 2010, Ultraviolet light treatment for the restoration of age-related degradation of titanium bioactivity, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, 49 Li, 2012, Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: an in vitro study, J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater, 100, 1587, 10.1002/jbm.b.32727 Roy, 2016, Photofunctionalization of titanium: an alternative explanation of its chemical–physical mechanism, PLoS One, 11, e0157481, 10.1371/journal.pone.0157481 Park, 2013, The effect of ultraviolet-C irradiation via a bactericidal ultraviolet sterilizer on an anodized titanium implant: a study in rabbits, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, 57, 10.11607/jomi.2638 Funato, 2013, Success rate, healing time, and implant stability of photofunctionalized dental implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, 1261, 10.11607/jomi.3263 Watanabe, 2012, Change in surface properties of zirconia and initial attachment of osteoblastlike cells with hydrophilic treatment, Dent Mater J, 31, 806, 10.4012/dmj.2012-069 Fujishima, 1972, Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode, Nature, 238, 37, 10.1038/238037a0 Fujishima, 2000, Titanium dioxide photocatalysis, J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev, 1, 1, 10.1016/S1389-5567(00)00002-2 Hashimoto, 2005, TiO2 photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospects, Jpn J Appl Phys, 44, 8269, 10.1143/JJAP.44.8269 Wang, 1997, Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces, Nature, 388, 431, 10.1038/41233 Enossal implant comprising an anatase coating (Patent EP2012703). Rupp, 2010, Multifunctional nature of UV-irradiated nanocrystalline anatase thin films for biomedical applications, Acta Biomater, 6, 4566, 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.021 Rupp, 2012, Formation and photocatalytic decomposition of a pellicle on anatase surfaces, J Dent Res, 91, 104, 10.1177/0022034511424901 Kister, 2017, Peri-implantitis cleaning instrumentation influences the integrity of photoactive nanocoatings, Dent Mater, 33, E69, 10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.002 Schmage, 2012, Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, 308 Wu, 2016, Photocatalytic antibacterial effects on TiO2-anatase upon UV-A and UV-A/VIS threshold irradiation, Biofouling, 32, 583, 10.1080/08927014.2016.1170118 Wu, 2015, Photocatalytic effects of reactively sputtered N-doped anatase upon irradiation at UV-A and UV-A/VIS threshold wavelengths, Surf Coat Technol, 272, 337, 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.045 Giljean, 2011, New insights on contact angle/roughness dependence on high surface energy materials, Appl Surf Sci, 257, 9631, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.088 Henningsen, 2017, Photofunctionalization and non-thermal plasma activation of titanium surfaces, Clin Oral Investig Duske, 2015, Cold atmospheric plasma in combination with mechanical treatment improves osteoblast growth on biofilm covered titanium discs, Biomaterials, 52, 327, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.035 Duske, 2012, Atmospheric plasma enhances wettability and cell spreading on dental implant metals, J Clin Periodontol, 39, 400, 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01853.x Canullo, 2016, Implant abutment cleaning by plasma of argon: 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial, J Periodontol, 87, 434, 10.1902/jop.2015.150549 Choi, 2016, Time-dependent effects of ultraviolet and nonthermal atmospheric pressure plasma on the biological activity of titanium, Sci Rep, 6, 33421, 10.1038/srep33421 Gan, 2016, Bioactivity and antibacterial effect of nitrogen plasma immersion ion implantation on polyetheretherketone, Dent Mater, 32, e263, 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.215 Zheng, 2015, Enhanced biological behavior of in vitro human gingival fibroblasts on cold plasma-treated zirconia, PLoS One, 10, e0140278, 10.1371/journal.pone.0140278 Milleret, 2011, Alkali treatment of microrough titanium surfaces affects macrophage/monocyte adhesion, platelet activation and architecture of blood clot formation, Eur Cell Mater, 21, 430, 10.22203/eCM.v021a32 Tugulu, 2010, Preparation of superhydrophilic microrough titanium implant surfaces by alkali treatment, J Mater Sci Mater Med, 21, 2751, 10.1007/s10856-010-4138-x von Wilmowsky, 2008, Osseointegration of chemically modified titanium surfaces: an in vivo study, Adv Eng Mater, 10, B61, 10.1002/adem.200800163 Park, 2012, Use of polyelectrolyte thin films to modulate Osteoblast response to microstructured titanium surfaces, Biomaterials, 33, 5267, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.074 Albrektsson, 2004, Oral implant surfaces: Part 1–review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them, Int J Prosthodont, 17, 536 Le Guehennec, 2007, Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration, Dent Mater, 23, 844, 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 Sul, 2006, Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces, Int J Prosthodont, 19, 319 Al Qahtani, 2015, UV-A and UV-C light induced hydrophilization of dental implants, Dent Mater, 31, E157, 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.011 Kurtz, 2007, PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants, Biomaterials, 28, 4845, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 Boccaccini, 2006, Electrophoretic deposition of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and PEEK/Bioglass (R) coatings on NiTi shape memory alloy wires, J Mater Sci, 41, 8152, 10.1007/s10853-006-0556-z Ha, 1997, Surface analysis of chemically-etched and plasma-treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for biomedical applications, Surf Coat Technol, 96, 293, 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00179-5 Petrovic, 2006, Effect of betaTCP filled polyetheretherketone on osteoblast cell proliferation in vitro, J Biomed Sci, 13, 41, 10.1007/s11373-005-9032-z Uhrenbacher, 2014, The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments, J Prosth Dent, 112, 1489, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.010 Schwitalla, 2013, PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature, J Oral Implantol, 39, 743, 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002 Schwitalla, 2015, Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone, J Biomech, 48, 1, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017 Rompen, 2006, The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review, Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, 55, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01367.x Yamano, 2011, Early peri-implant tissue reactions on different titanium surface topographies, Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, 815, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02059.x Davies, 1998, Mechanisms of endosseous integration, Int J Prosthodont, 11, 391 Davies, 2003, Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing, J Dent Educ, 67, 932, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x Schwartz, 1997, Underlying mechanisms at the bone-surface interface during regeneration, J Periodontal Res, 32, 166, 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1997.tb01399.x Neuss, 2010, Secretion of fibrinolytic enzymes facilitates human mesenchymal stem cell invasion into fibrin clots, Cells Tissues Organs, 191, 36, 10.1159/000215579 Donos, 2011, Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface, Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, 365, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02113.x Lang, 2011, Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans, Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, 349, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x Wall, 2009, Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro, Bone, 45, 17, 10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.662 Schwarz, 2007, Chemically modified, ultra-hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces, Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie: MKG, 11, 11, 10.1007/s10006-006-0045-1 Schwarz, 2007, istological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs, Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, 481, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01341.x Long, 1995, Regulation of human bone marrow-derived osteoprogenitor cells by osteogenic growth factors, J Clin Invest, 95, 881, 10.1172/JCI117738 Reilly, 1998, Similarities in the phenotypic expression of pericytes and bone cells, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 95 Nygren, 1997, The initial reactions of TiO2 with blood, J Biomed Mater Res, 34, 487, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970315)34:4<487::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-G Scheideler, 2006, Influence of titanium surface modifications on initial protein/surface and cell/surface interactions, Biomaterialien, 7, 111 Scheideler, 2005, Storage conditions of titanium implants influence molecular and cellular interactions, J Dent Res, 84 Kopf, 2015, The role of nanostructures and hydrophilicity in osseointegration: in-vitro protein-adsorption and blood-interaction studies, J Biomed Mater Res A, 103, 2661, 10.1002/jbm.a.35401 Martin, 1995, Effect of titanium surface-roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein-synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (Mg63), J Biomed Mater Res, 29, 389, 10.1002/jbm.820290314 Kennedy, 2006, Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation, Biomaterials, 27, 3817, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.044 Lotz, 2016, Osteogenic response of human MSCs and osteoblasts to hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanostructured titanium implant surfaces, J Biomed Mater Res A, 104, 3137, 10.1002/jbm.a.35852 Gittens, 2014, Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants, Acta Biomater, 10, 3363, 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037 Zhao, 2007, Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography, Biomaterials, 28, 2821, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.024 Puleo, 1999, Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface, Biomaterials, 20, 2311, 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X Johansson, 2012, Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits, Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, 943, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02233.x Mendonca, 2008, Advancing dental implant surface technology–from micron- to nanotopography, Biomaterials, 29, 3822, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012 Mendonca, 2010, The combination of micron and nanotopography by H(2)SO(4)/H(2)O(2) treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs, J Biomed Mater Res A, 94, 169, 10.1002/jbm.a.32701 Mendonca, 2009, The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression, Biomaterials, 30, 4053, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.010 Yi, 2006, Characterization of a bioactive nanotextured surface created by controlled chemical oxidation of titanium, Surf Sci, 600, 4613, 10.1016/j.susc.2006.07.053 Gittens, 2011, The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation, Biomaterials, 32, 3395, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 Yao, 2008, Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures, J Biomed Mater Res A, 85, 157, 10.1002/jbm.a.31551 Parker, 2005, Inductively coupled plasma etching of bulk titanium for MEMS applications, J Electrochem Soc, 152, C675, 10.1149/1.2006647 Bruinink, 2014, Addition of nanoscaled bioinspired surface features: a revolution for bone-related implants and scaffolds?, J Biomed Mater Res A, 102A, 275, 10.1002/jbm.a.34691 Gonzalez-Garcia, 2010, Effect of nanoscale topography on fibronectin adsorption, focal adhesion size and matrix organisation, Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 77, 181, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.01.021 Khor, 2007, Response of cells on surface-induced nanopatterns: fibroblasts and mesenchymal progenitor cells, Biomacromolecules, 8, 1530, 10.1021/bm0611533 Liang L, Rupp F, Spintzyk S, Krieg P, Killinger A, Richter G, Scherberger R, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Scheideler L. Influence of different anatase surface modifications on cell reactions of human osteoblasts. 5th International Symposium Interface Biology of Implants Rostock Warnemünde, Germany, May 6–8 2015 (27072017: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276891545_Influence_of_different_anatase_surface_modifications_on_cell_reactions_of_human_osteoblasts) 2015. Smith, 2007, Decreased fibroblast and increased osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured NaOH-etched PLGA scaffolds, Int J Nanomed, 2, 383 Murphy, 2017, Toward optimizing dental implant performance: surface characterization of Ti and TiZr implant materials, Dent Mater, 33, 43, 10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.001 Ajami, 2016, Early bone anchorage to micro- and nano-topographically complex implant surfaces in hyperglycemia, Acta Biomater, 39, 169, 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.017 Hsu, 2013, Effect of micro- and nanoscale topography on the adhesion of bacterial cells to solid surfaces, Appl Environ Microbiol, 79, 2703, 10.1128/AEM.03436-12 Mitik-Dineva, 2008, Impact of nano-topography on bacterial attachment, Biotechnol J, 3, 536, 10.1002/biot.200700244 Variola, 2009, Improving biocompatibility of implantable metals by nanoscale modification of surfaces: an overview of strategies, fabrication methods, and challenges, Small, 5, 996, 10.1002/smll.200801186 Tang, 2009, TGF-beta1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation, Nat Med, 15, 757, 10.1038/nm.1979 Boyan, 2003, Pretreatment of bone with osteoclasts affects phenotypic expression of osteoblast-like cells, J Orthop Res, 21, 638, 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00261-9 Davies, 2007, Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces, Biomaterials, 28, 5058, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.049 Engel, 2008, Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: the materials side, Trends Biotechnol, 26, 39, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.10.005 Canullo, 2015, International brainstorming meeting on etiologic and risk factors of peri-implantitis, Montegrotto (Padua, Italy), August 2014, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, 1093, 10.11607/jomi.4386 Chrcanovic, 2016, Factors influencing early dental implant failures, J Dent Res, 95, 995, 10.1177/0022034516646098 Fickl, 2011, Bone loss after full-thickness and partial-thickness flap elevation, J Clin Periodontol, 38, 157, 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01658.x Gomez-Roman, 2017, Vertical and horizontal crestal bone levels in root-analog stepped implants—a 10-year prospective study, Implant Dent, 26, 524, 10.1097/ID.0000000000000598 Noda, 2015, A longitudinal retrospective study of the analysis of the risk factors of implant failure by the application of generalized estimating equations, J Prosthodont Res, 59, 178, 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.04.003 Esposito, 2014, Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD003815 Weigl, 2016, The impact of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants on hard and soft tissues in the anterior maxilla, Eur J Oral Implantol, 9, S89 Webster, 2000, Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics, J Biomed Mater Res, 51, 475, 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<475::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO;2-9 Vogler, 1999, Water and the acute biological response to surfaces, J Biomater Sci: Polym Ed, 10, 1015, 10.1163/156856299X00667 Vogler, 2012, Protein adsorption in three dimensions, Biomaterials, 33, 1201, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.059 Arima, 2007, Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers, Biomaterials, 28, 3074, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 Ivanova, 2010, Impact of nanoscale roughness of titanium thin film surfaces on bacterial retention, Langmuir, 26, 1973, 10.1021/la902623c Jahed, 2014, Responses of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial cells to nanocrystalline nickel nanostructures, Biomaterials, 35, 4249, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.080 Truong, 2010, The influence of nano-scale surface roughness on bacterial adhesion to ultrafine-grained titanium, Biomaterials, 31, 3674, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.071 Krajewski, 2014, Bacterial interactions with proteins and cells relevant to the development of life-threatening endocarditis studied by use of a quartz-crystal microbalance, Anal Bioanal Chem, 406, 3395, 10.1007/s00216-014-7769-9 Eichler, 2011, The impact of dendrimer-grafted modifications to model silicon surfaces on protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion, Biomaterials, 32, 9168, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.063 Katzur, 2012, Surface-immobilized PAMAM-dendrimers modified with cationic or anionic terminal functions: physicochemical surface properties and conformational changes after application of liquid interface stress, J Colloid Interface Sci, 366, 179, 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.029