Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis
Tóm tắt
Sphincter-saving surgery for the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer has spread considerably when total mesorectal excision became standard treatment. In order to reduce leakage-related complications, surgeons often perform a derivative stoma, a loop ileostomy (LI), or a loop colostomy (LC), but to date, there is no evidence on which is the better technique to adopt. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials until 2007 and observational studies comparing temporary LI and LC for temporary decompression of colorectal and/or coloanal anastomoses. Clinically relevant events were grouped into four study outcomes:
Twelve comparative studies were included in this analysis, five randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies. Overall, the included studies reported on 1,529 patients, 894 (58.5%) undergoing defunctioning LI. LI reduced the risk of construction of the stoma outcome measure (odds ratio, OR = 0.47). Specifically, patients undergoing LI had a lower risk of prolapse (OR = 0.21) and sepsis (OR = 0.54). LI was associated with an excess risk of occlusion after stoma closure (OR = 2.13) and dehydratation (OR = 4.61). No other significant difference was found for outcomes. Our overview shows that LI is associated with a lower risk of construction of the stoma outcome measures.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 28:1479–1482
Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171
Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216
Giuliani D, Willemsen P, Van Elst F, Vanderveken M (2006) A defunctioning stoma in the treatment of lower third rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 106:40–43
Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R et al (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142
Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. A randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214
Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P (2004) Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 27:202–210
Guenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24:CD004647. Review
Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of outcome following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 3:1142–1151. Review
Norris SL, Atkins D (2005) Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions. Ann Intern Med 142:1112–1119. Review
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012
Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P et al (2004) Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 77:745–753
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634
Egger M, Smith GD (1995) Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 311:753–754
Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558
Popovic M, Petrovic M, Matic S, Milovanovic A (2001) Protective colostomy or ileostomy. Acta Chir Iugosl 48:39–42
Lassalle FAB, Benati M, Quintana GO, Moscone CJ (1990) Loop ileostomy as alternative to transverse colostomy to protect distal anastomosis. Rev Argent Chirurg 58:160–164
Nordstrom G, Hulten L (1983) Loop ileostomy as an alternative to transverse loop ileostomy. J Enterostomal Ther 10:92–94
Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363
Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, Lewis AA (1987) Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:5–7
Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708
Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J (2001) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 25:274–277; discussion 277–278
Rutegard J, Dahlgren S (1987) Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Scand 153:229–232
Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Piccini M et al (2002) Use of ileostomy and colostomy as temporal derivation in colorectal surgery. G Chir 23:48–52
Gohring U, Lehner B, Schlag P (1988) Ileostomy versus colostomy as temporary deviation stoma in relation to stoma closure. Chirurg 59:842–844
Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570
Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79
Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I (1980) Loop ileostomy—an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 146:203–207
Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D (2001) Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion. Arch Surg 136:338–342
McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154
Bell SW, Walker KJ, Richard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266
Walker KG, Bell SW, Richard MJ, Mehanna D, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259
Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio WF (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:243–250
Barrier A, Martel P, Dugue L, Gallot D, Malafosse M (2001) Direct and reservoir colonic-anal anastomoses. Short and long term results. Ann Chir 126:18–25