Behavior and failure mechanisms of masonry-infilled RC frames (in low-rise buildings) subject to lateral loading

Moghaddam HA, Dowling PJ. The state art of the art in infilled frames. ESEE research report no 87-2. Civil Engineering Department, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London; 1987. Comite Euro-International Du Beton (CEB). RC frames under earthquake loading: state of the art report. Thomas Telford, London; 1996. Kaushik, 2006, Code approaches to seismic design of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames: a state-of-the-art-review, Earthquake Spectra, 22, 961, 10.1193/1.2360907 Asteris, 2012, Numerical investigation of the effect of infill walls on the structural response of RC frames, Open Construct Build Technol J, 6, 164, 10.2174/1874836801206010164 Asteris, 2013, Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art, Eng Struct, 56, 1905, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.010 Mehrabi, 1996, Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames, J Struct Eng ASCE, 122, 228, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228) Al-Chaar, 2002, Behavior of masonry–infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames, J Struct Eng ASCE, 128, 1055, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1055) Blackard, 2009, vol. SP-265-9 Fardis, 2009, vol. 8 Asteris, 2011, Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art, J Struct Eng ASCE, 137, 1508, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000384 Markulak, 2013, Cyclic testing of single bay steel frames with various types of masonry infill, Eng Struct, 51, 267, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.026 Uva, 2012, Appraisal of masonry infill walls effect in the seismic response of RC framed buildings: a case study, Eng Struct, 34, 514, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.043 Anil, 2007, An experimental study on reinforced concrete partially infilled frames, Eng Struct, 29, 449, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.05.011 Ghosh, 2002, Finite element analysis of infilled frames, J Struct Eng ASCE, 128, 881, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(881) El-Dakhakhni, 2003, Three-strut model for concrete masonry-infilled frames, J Struct Eng ASCE, 129, 177, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177) European Committee of Standardization (CEN). Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1, Eurocode 8. Brussels; 2004. ASCE. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41–13. Reston, Virginia, USA; 2013. Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC). Building code requirements and specifications for masonry structures. Farmington Hills, MI; 2013. Moretti, 2014, Design of reinforced concrete infilled frames, J Struct Eng ASCE, 140, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001042 Celarec, 2013, Practice-oriented probabilistic seismic performance assessment of infilled frames with consideration of shear failure of columns, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 42, 1339, 10.1002/eqe.2275 D’Ayala, 2009, Realistic shear capacity assessment of infill frames: comparison of two numerical procedures, Eng Struct, 31, 1745, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.044 Basha, 2015, Suitability of fly ash brick masonry as infill in reinforced concrete frames, Mater Struct Tasnimi, 2011, Investigation on the behavior of brick-infilled steel frames with openings, experimental and analytical approaches, Eng Struct, 33, 968, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.018 Kakaletsis, 2008, Influence of masonry strength and openings on infilled R/C frames under cycling loading, J Earthquake Eng, 12, 197, 10.1080/13632460701299138 Zovkic, 2013, Cyclic testing of a single bay reinforced concrete frames with various types of masonry infill, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 42, 1131, 10.1002/eqe.2263 Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete–code of practice, IS 456, 4th revision. New Delhi, India; 2000. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1: General provisions and buildings, IS 1893. New Delhi, India; 2002. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Indian standard ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces–code of practice, IS 13920. New Delhi, India; 1993. American Concrete Institute (ACI). Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318; 2007. Basha, 2015, Evaluation of non-linear material properties of fly ash brick masonry under compression and shear, J Mater Civil Eng ASCE, 27, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001188 Kaushik, 2007, Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression, J Mater Civil Eng ASCE, 19, 728, 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728) Asteris, 2011, Failure modes of in-filled frames, Electron J Struct Eng, 11, 11, 10.56748/ejse.11139 Mansouri, 2014, Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of low-shear strength masonry infills with openings in reinforced concrete frames with deficient seismic details, Struct Des Tall Spec Build, 23, 1190, 10.1002/tal.1115 Chiou, 2015, Tests on cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete frames with brick infill, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 44, 1939, 10.1002/eqe.2564 Stylianidis, 2012, Experimental investigation of masonry infilled R/C frames, Open Construct Build Technol J, 6, 194, 10.2174/1874836801206010194 Kakaletsis, 2011, Effectiveness of rectangular spiral shear reinforcement on infilled R/C frames under cyclic loading, J Earthquake Eng, 15, 1178, 10.1080/13632469.2011.560361 Dizhur, 2013, Diagonal tension strength of vintage unreinforced clay brick masonry wall panels, Construct Build Mater, 43, 418, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.015 Mainstone, 1971, On the stiffnesses and strengths of infilled frames, Proc Inst Civil Eng, 57