Exploratory Subgroup Analyses of Renal Function and Overall Survival in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial of Nephron-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephrectomy

European Urology Focus - Tập 3 - Trang 599-605 - 2017
Emil Scosyrev1,2, Edward M. Messing1, Richard Sylvester3, Hendrik Van Poppel4
1Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
2Quantitative Safety and Epidemiology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
3EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
4Department of Urology, University Hospital, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Tài liệu tham khảo

Van Poppel, 2007, A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma, Eur Urol, 51, 1606, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.013 Van Poppel, 2011, A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma, Eur Urol, 59, 543, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013 Scosyrev, 2014, Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904, Eur Urol, 65, 372, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044 Scosyrev, 2014, Overall survival after partial versus radical nephrectomy for a small renal mass: systematic review of observational studies, Urol Pract, 1, 27, 10.1016/j.urpr.2014.02.009 Zhang, 2015, Subgroup analyses in reporting of phase III clinical trials in solid tumors, J Clin Oncol, 33, 1697, 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8862 Rothwell, 2005, Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation, Lancet, 365, 176, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5 Rothman, 1990, No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons, Epidemiology, 1, 43, 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010 Mir, 2017, Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T2 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies, Eur. Urol., 71, 606, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060 Kim, 2012, Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Urol, 188, 51, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.006 Pierorazio, 2016, Management of renal masses and localized renal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Urol, 196, 989, 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.081 Woldu, 2014, Who really benefits from nephron-sparing surgery?, Urology, 84, 860, 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.061 Campbell, 2014, Editorial comment: who really benefits from nephron-sparing surgery?, Urology, 84, 867, 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.062 Capitanio, 2015, Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a–T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function, Eur Urol, 67, 683, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.027 Tomaszewski, 2015, Retrospective comparison of cardiovascular risk in preselected patients undergoing kidney cancer surgery: reflection of reality or simply what we want to hear?, Eur Urol, 67, 690, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.037 Ljungberg, 2014, Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma, European Association of Urology Shuch, 2013, Overall survival advantage with partial nephrectomy: a bias of observational data?, Cancer, 119, 2981, 10.1002/cncr.28141 Campbell, 2007, Renal tumors