Effects of Estrogen Receptor Expression and Histopathology on Annual Hazard Rates of Death from Breast Cancer

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 100 - Trang 121-126 - 2006
William F. Anderson1, Bingshu E. Chen1, Ismail Jatoi2, Philip S. Rosenberg1
1DHHS/NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Biostatistics Branch, Rockville, USA
2Department of Surgery National Naval Medical Center and Uniformed Services, University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA

Tóm tắt

Breast cancer incidence rates vary according to estrogen receptor expression (ER) and histopathology. We hypothesized that annual mortality rates from breast cancer after initial diagnosis (hazard rates) might also vary by ER and histopathology. We accessioned the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, 1992–2002) program to estimate hazard rates according to ER (positive and negative) and histopathology (duct, tubular, lobular, medullary, inflammatory, papillary, and mucinous types). We used spline functions to model hazard rates free of strongly parametric assumptions for ER negative and positive cases overall and by histopathology. Hazard rates for ER negative and ER positive cases were distinct and non-proportional. At 17 months, ER negative hazard rates peaked at 7.5% per year (95% CI, 7.3–7.8% per year) then declined, whereas ER positive hazard rates lacked a sharp early peak and were comparatively constant at 1.5–2% per year. Falling ER negative and constant ER positive hazard rates crossed at 7 years; after which, prognosis was better for ER negative cases. Among ER positive and negative cases, there were proportional and non-proportional hazards according to histopathologic type, but the two basic ER-associated patterns were maintained. Hazard rates differed quantitatively and qualitatively according to ER and histopathology. These large-scale population-based results seem consistent with genomic studies, demonstrating two main classes of breast cancers with distinct prognoses according to ER expression.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Brinkley D, Haybittle J (1984) Long-term survival of women with breast cancer. Lancet 1:1118 Gore SM, Pocock SJ, Kerr GR (1984) Regression models and non-proportional hazards in the analysis of breast cancer survival. Appl Stat 33:176–195 Saphner T, Tormey DC, Gray R (1996) Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy. J Clin Oncol 14:2738–2746 Yakovlev AY, Tsodikov AD, Boucher K, Kerber R (1999) The shape of the hazard function in breast carcinoma: curability of the disease revisited. Cancer 85:1789–1798 Gray RJ (1994) Spline-based tests in survival analysis. Biometrics 50:640–652 Gray RJ (1992) Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with application to breast cancer prognosis. J Am Stat Assoc 87:942–951 Hilsenbeck SG, Ravdin PM, de Moor CA, Chamness GC, Osborne CK, Clark GM (1998) Time-dependence of hazard ratios for prognostic factors in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52:227–237 Demicheli R, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G (2002) Double-peaked time distribution of mortality for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:127–134 Boracchi P, Biganzoli E, Marubini E (2003) Joint modelling of cause-specific hazard functions with cubic splines: an application to a large series of breast cancer patients. Comput Stat Data Anal 42:243–262 Jatoi I, Tsimelzon A, Weiss H, Clark GM, Hilsenbeck SG (2005) Hazard rates of recurrence following diagnosis of primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:173–178 Anderson WF, Jatoi I, Devesa SS (2005) Distinct breast cancer incidence and prognostic patterns in the NCI’s SEER program: suggesting a possible link between etiology and outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 90:127–137 Baum M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W, Retsky M (2005) Does surgery unfavourably perturb the “natural history” of early breast cancer by accelerating the appearance of distant metastases? Eur J Cancer 41:508–515 Takeuchi H, Baba H, Kano T, Maehara Y (2005) The time-related changes of the importance of prognostic factors in breast cancer. A sequential multivariate analysis of 1423 Japanese patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94:273–278 SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Public-Use Database (1973–2002), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2005, based on the November 2004 submission, 2005, www.seer.cancer.gov Berg JW, Hutter RV (1995) Breast cancer. Cancer 75:257–269 SEER: ICD-O-3 Coding Materials, 2004, http://seer.cancer.gov/icd-o-3/ Rosenberg PS (1995) Hazard function estimation using B-splines. Biometrics 51:874–887 Akaike H (1973) In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) 2nd International symposium on information theory, Budapest, Akademiai Kiado, pp 267–281 Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, New York Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Method) 57:289–300 Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 34:187–220 Anderson WF, Chu KC, Chang S, Sherman ME (2004) Comparison of age-specific incidence rate patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:1128–1135 Mariotto A, Feuer EJ, Harlan LC, Wun LM, Johnson KA, Abrams J (2002) Trends in use of adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States: 1975–1999. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1626–1634 Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Edwards BK (1996) Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1571–1579 Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717 Spratt JS Jr, Kaltenbach ML, Spratt JA (1977) Cytokinetic definition of acute and chronic breast cancer. Cancer Res 37:226– 230 Lilienfeld AM, Johnson EA (1955) The age distribution in female breast and genital cancers. Cancer 8:875–882 De Waard F, De Laive JWJ, Baanders-van Halewijn EA (1960) On bimodal age distribution of mammary carcinoma. Br J Cancer 14:437–448 Rosen PP, Oberman HA (1993) Tumors of the mammary gland. Armed Forces Institue of Pathology, Washington, DC Anderson WF, Althuis MD, Brinton LA, Devesa SS (2004) Is male breast cancer similar or different than female breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 83:77–86 Anderson WF, Chu KC, Devesa SS (2004) Distinct incidence patterns among in-situ and invasive breast carcinomas, with possible etiologic implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:149–159 Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752 Winer EP, Carey LA, Dowsett M, Tripathy D (2005) In: Michael C Perry (ed) American society of clinical onocolgy education book. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, pp 46–59