Sequencers in different text genres: Academic writing, journalese and fiction

Ädel, 2005, On the boundaries between evaluation and metadiscourse Bhatia, 1993 Britten, 1978 Bunton, 1999, The use of higher level metatext in PhD Theses, English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41, 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2 Charolles, M., 1997. L’encadrement du discours – Univers, champ, domaines et espace. Cahier de recherche linguistique 6, pp. 1–73 (http://www.lattice.cnrs.fr/). Coates, 1987, Epistemic modality and spoken discourse, 110 Cooper, 1980 Crismore, 1990, Metadiscourse and discourse processes: interactions and issues, Discourse Processes, 13, 191, 10.1080/01638539009544753 Crismore, 1990, Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse, 119 Crismore, 1993, Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish University students, Written Communication, 10, 39, 10.1177/0741088393010001002 Degand, 2004, Connecteurs et analyse de corpus: de l’analyse manuelle à l’analyse automatisée, 49 Fauconnier, 1994 Foucault, 1978 Granger, S., 2003. A multi-contrastive approach to the use of linkwords by advanced learners of English: evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. Paper presented at the ‘Pragmatic Markers in Contrast’ workshop organized by the Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten, Brussels, 22–23 May 2003. Halliday, 1973 Halliday, 1994 Hogue, 1996 Hyland, 1998, Persuasion and context: the pragmatics of academic discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437, 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5 Hyland, 1999, Disciplinary discourses: writer stance in research articles, 99 Hyland, 2000 Hyland, 2004, Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal, Applied Linguistics, 25, 156, 10.1093/applin/25.2.156 Jackiewicz, A., 2002. Repérage et délimitation des cadres organisationnels pour la segmentation automatique des textes. CIFT’02, pp. 95–105. Jackiewicz, 2003, L’identification des structures discursives engendrées par les cadres organisationnels, TALN, 2003, 155 Kirsch, 1990 Kolb, 1980 Leonhard, 2002 Mao, 1993, I conclude not: towards a pragmatic account of metadiscourse, Rhetoric Review, 11, 265, 10.1080/07350199309389006 Mauranen, 1993 Odell, 1983, Redefining maturity in writing, 98 Oshima, 1988 Pander Maat, 2001, Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of Speaker Involvement, Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 211, 10.1515/cogl.2002.002 Partington, 1998 Perelman, 1982 Pit, 2003 Porter, 1992 Rietveld, 2004, Pitfalls in corpus research, Computers and the Humanities, 38, 343, 10.1007/s10579-004-1919-1 Schiffrin, 1980, Metatalk: organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse, Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction, 50, 199, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x Spooren, W., Sanders, T., Huiskes, M., Degand, L., in press. Subjectivity and Causality: A Corpus Study of Spoken Language. In: Rice, S., Newman, J. (Eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. CSLI Publications. Turco, 1988, Des agents doubles de l’organisation textuelle, les marqueurs d’intégration linéaire, Pratiques, 57, 57, 10.3406/prati.1988.1473 Vande Kopple, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36, 82, 10.2307/357609 Vande Kopple, 2002, Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric, 91 Wiese, 1984, Language production in foreign and native languages, 11 Williams, 1981 Dahl, 2004, Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?, Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807, 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004 Degand, L., Spooren, W., Bestgen, Y., 2004. On the Use of Automatic Tools for Large-scale Semantic Analyses of Causal Connectives. Discourse Annotation: A Workshop in conjunction with ACL’04. Mauranen, 1993, Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts, English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3, 10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I