Assessment of gait and quality of life in women with hallux valgus deformity
Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - Tập 26 - Trang 1-6 - 2016
Tóm tắt
This study was conducted to evaluate gait and quality of life in women with the hallux valgus deformity. To study, ranging between 18-55 years of age, according to the Manchester Scaledeformation degree 2 and on, 30 volunteers who have been diagnosed with hallux valgus (experimental group) and 30 healthy subjects (control group) were included. Individuals were evaluated in terms of demographic charecteristics, gait and quality of life. Evaluation of gait used method of foot print, evaluation of quality of life used SF-36. When time-distance characteristics of gait were compared, the difference in favor of control group was observed about step width, foot angle, cadance, gait speed (p<0,05). When viewed in terms of individual for quality of life, in the experimental group was found to be adversely affected in terms of parameters of physical functionning, physical role, bodily pain, vitality, social functionning, emotional role, physical parts summary, emotional parts summary of the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire (p<0,05). In the light of the results obtained from the study, it has been concluded, hallux valgus deformity has negative impact on gait and quality of life in women.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Joseph TN, Mroczek KJ. Decision making in the treatment of hallux valgus. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. 2007;65(1), 19–23.
Uygur F. Ayak deformite ve ortezleri. Ankara: Volkan Matbaacılık. 1992
Uchiyama E, Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, Grande JP, Kura H, An KN.Pathomechanics of hallux valgus: biomechanical and immunohistochemical study. Foot and Ankle International. 2005;26(9), 732–738.
Bock P, Kristen KH, Kröner A, Engel A. Hallux valgus and cartilage degeneration in the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2004;86(5), 669–673.
Mark E, Trnka HJ. Current Concepts review: hallux valgus part 1: pathomechanics, clinical assessment and nonoperative management. Foot and Ankle İnternational. 2007;28(5), 654–659.
Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle International. 2007;28(7), 759–777.
Baravarian B, Ben-Ad R. Revision Hallux valgus: Causes and Correction Options.Clin Podiatr Med Surg.2014;31(2):291–298.
Nork SE, Coughlin RR. (1996). How to examine a foot and what to do with abunion. Orthopedics. 23:281–97.
Ferrari J, Higgins JP, Williams RL. Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus)and bunions. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Online. 2000;(2):CD000964.
Parker J, Nester CJ, Long AF, Barrie J. The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery. Foot and Ankle International/ American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Angle Society. 2003;24(1): 56–60.
Hawke F, Burns J, Radford JA, du Toit V. Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2008; 16;(3):CD006801.
Dawson J, Doll H, Coffey J, Jenkinson C. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. OsteoArthritis and Cartilage. 2007;15: 918–931.
Menz HB, Lord SR. Foot problems, functional impairment, and falls in older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assn.1999;89 (9): 458–67.
Tüzün Ç, Tıkız C. Foot problems in the elderly. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2003;6 (4): 135–141
Menz HB, Munteanu SE. Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology. 2005;44:1061–1066.
Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A. SF-36’nın Türkçe için güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği, İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12(2) : 102–106.
Arslan Ş, Gökçe KY. Quality of life assessment in geriatricts, Turkish Journal of Geriatricts. 1999;2(4): 173–178.
Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, Semin S ve ark. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36(SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health 2006, 6:24–7
Smidt GL. Gait in Rehabilitation. A Division of Harcourt Brace & - Company, USA, 1. Baskı; 1990;2-43, 199–252.
Whittle MW. Gait Analysis: An Introduction. Butterworth Heinmann, Oxford, 1991;130–200.
Bek N, Kürklü B. Halluks valgus tedavisinde kullanılan farklı konservatif yöntemlerin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi, 2002;13(2), 90–93.
Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus - etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. Clin. Orthop. 1981;157:31–41.
Morris J, Ryan M. First Metatarsal Base Osteotomies for Hallux abducto valgus Deformities.Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2014;31(2):247–263.
Klein C, Knapp EG, Kundi M, Kinz W. Increased halluz angle in children and its association with insufficient length of foot wear: A community based cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10:159,1-13. httm: www.biomed central.com/1471- 2474/10/159. Erişim tarihi: 20.12.2009.
Menz HB, Morris ME. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology. 2005;51,346–351.
Berker N, Yalçın S, Yavuzer G, Gök H. Yürüme Analizi. 2001 ISBN 975 94257 1 8.
Perry J. Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. 1992. 20, 431-435. USA, Slack Incorporated.
Bohannon, RW. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinents. Age and Ageing.26,15–19.