A theory-based intervention to prevent calibration effects in serial sport performance evaluations

Psychology of Sport and Exercise - Tập 18 - Trang 47-52 - 2015
Frowin Fasold1, Daniel Memmert1, Christian Unkelbach2
1Institute of Cognitive and Team/Racket Sport Research, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
2Faculty of Human Sciences, Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bruine de Bruin, 2005, Save the last dance for me. Unwanted serial position effects in jury evaluations, Acta Psychologica, 118, 245, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.08.005 Colton, 1967, An assay of medical students abilities by oral examination, Journal of Medical Examination, 42, 1005 Díaz-Pereira, 2014, Automatic recognition and scoring of olympic rhythmic gymnastics movements, Human Movement Sciences, 34, 63, 10.1016/j.humov.2014.01.001 Emerson, 2012, Statistical sleuthing by leveraging human nature: a study of olympic figure skating, The American Statistician, 65, 143, 10.1198/tast.2011.10165 Engle, 2002, Working memory capacity as executive attention, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19, 10.1111/1467-8721.00160 Fasold, 2012, Extreme judgments depend on the expectations of following judgments: a calibration analysis, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 197, 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.11.004 Fasold, 2013, Calibration processes in a serial talent test, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 488, 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.001 Gawronski, 2012 Haubensak, 1992, The consistency model: a process model for absolute judgments, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 303 Heider, 1958 Kerstholt, 1998, Judicial decision making: order of evidence presentation and availability of background information, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 445, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199810)12:5<445::AID-ACP518>3.0.CO;2-8 Kimmel, 1957, Three criteria for the use of one-tailed tests, Psychological Bulletin, 54, 351, 10.1037/h0046737 Mehrotra, 2003, A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions, Biometrics, 59, 441, 10.1111/1541-0420.00051 Morgan, 2014, The harder the task, the higher the score: findings of a difficulty bias, Economic Inquiry, 52, 1014, 10.1111/ecin.12074 Pabst, 2013 Parducci, 1965, Category judgment. A range-frequency model, Psychological Review, 72, 407, 10.1037/h0022602 Parducci, 1968, The relativism of absolute judgment, Scientific American, 219, 84, 10.1038/scientificamerican1268-84 Parducci, 1986, The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 496 Plessner, 1999, Expectation biases in gymnastics judging, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 131, 10.1123/jsep.21.2.131 Schorer, 2012, Back to the future. A case report of ongoing evaluation of the German handball talent selection and development system Stefani, 1998, Predicting outcomes, 249 Steiner, 1989, Immediate and delayed primacy and recency effects in performance evaluation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 136, 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.136 Unkelbach, 2008, Game-management, context-effects and calibration: the case of yellow cards in soccer, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 95, 10.1123/jsep.30.1.95 Unkelbach, 2014, Serial position effects in evaluative judgments, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 195, 10.1177/0963721414533701 Unkelbach, 2012, A calibration explanation of serial position effects in evaluative judgments, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 103, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.004 Wedell, 1989, Students perceptions of fair grading: a range-frequency analysis, The American Journal of Psychology, 102, 233, 10.2307/1422955