Controlling for the Effects of History and Nonequilibrium Conditions in Gene Flow Estimates in Northern Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) Populations

Genetics - Tập 168 Số 3 - Trang 1491-1506 - 2004
James D. Austin1, Stephen C. Lougheed1, Peter T. Boag1
1Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6.

Tóm tắt

Abstract Nonequilibrium conditions due to either allopatry followed by secondary contact or recent range expansion can confound measurements of gene flow among populations in previously glaciated regions. We determined the scale at which gene flow can be estimated among breeding aggregations of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) at the northern limit of their range in Ontario, Canada, using seven highly polymorphic DNA microsatellite loci. We first identified breeding aggregations that likely share a common history, determined from the pattern of allelic richness, factorial correspondence analysis, and a previously published mtDNA phylogeography, and then tested for regional equilibrium by evaluating the association between pairwise FST and geographic distance. Regional breeding aggregations in eastern Ontario separated by <100 km were determined to be at or near equilibrium. High levels of gene flow were measured using traditional F-statistics and likelihood estimates of Nm. Similarly high levels of recent migration (past one to three generations) were estimated among the breeding aggregations using nonequilibrium methods. We also show that, in many cases, breeding aggregations separated by up to tens of kilometers are not genetically distinct enough to be considered separate genetic populations. These results have important implications both for the identification of independent “populations” and in assessing the effect of scale in detecting patterns of genetic equilibrium and gene flow.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2002, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 25, 316, 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00260-9

2003, Mol. Ecol., 12, 3165, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01948.x

2004, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 32, 799, 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.03.006

2002, Mol. Ecol., 11, 771, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01474.x

1999, Mol. Ecol., 8, 563, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00594.x

2004, Mol. Ecol., 13, 827, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02101.x

1999, Genetics, 152, 763, 10.1093/genetics/152.2.763

2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4563, 10.1073/pnas.081068098

1990, Evolution, 44, 2047

2003, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 79, 389, 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00199.x

2002, J. Hered., 93, 153, 10.1093/jhered/93.2.153

1998, Trends Ecol. Evol., 13, 202, 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01284-6

1993, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 52, 922

2003, Evolution, 57, 372, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00271.x

1998, Evolution, 52, 355, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01637.x

2000, Evolution, 54, 974, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00097.x

2003, Genetics, 163, 367, 10.1093/genetics/163.1.367

1992, Mamm. Genome, 3, 452, 10.1007/BF00356155

1996, Mol. Ecol., 5, 89, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00294.x

1998, Conserv. Biol., 12, 331, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97183.x

1997, Aust. J. Ecol., 22, 185, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1997.tb00658.x

1998, Evolution, 52, 1147, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01841.x

2001, Evolution, 55, 1882, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00837.x

2002, Auk, 119, 820, 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0820:MSFSSO]2.0.CO;2

2003, Theor. Popul. Biol., 63, 231, 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00003-0

1999, Mol. Ecol., 8, 1513, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00730.x

1978, Can. Field Nat., 92, 78

2002, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2, 618, 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00305.x

2003, Genetics, 163, 1467, 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1467

1996, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 58, 247, 10.1006/bijl.1996.0035

1978, Evolution, 32, 850, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb04639.x

1971, Ecology, 52, 577, 10.2307/1934145

1999, Evolution, 53, 1898, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04571.x

1953, Annu. Rept. Natl. Inst. Genet., 3, 62

1964, Genetics, 49, 561, 10.1093/genetics/49.4.561

1995, Evolution, 49, 885

1996, Trends Ecol. Evol., 11, 514, 10.1016/S0169-5347(96)20074-6

1999, Evolution, 53, 769, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05371.x

1999, Evolution, 53, 1995

1955, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 20, 52

1967, Cancer Res., 27, 209

2001, Conserv. Biol., 15, 40, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x

1998, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 265, 523, 10.1098/rspb.1998.0326

2001, Heredity, 87, 421, 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00922.x

1973, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 70, 3321, 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321

1977, Ann. Hum. Genet., 41, 225, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1977.tb01918.x

2002, Conserv. Genet., 3, 167, 10.1023/A:1015213626922

1973, Genet. Res., 22, 201, 10.1017/S0016672300012994

1991, Science, 253, 892, 10.1126/science.253.5022.892

2001, Herpetologica, 57, 449

1998, Am. Nat., 152, 428, 10.1086/286180

1998, Conserv. Biol., 12, 844, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96489.x

2002, Can. J. Zool., 80, 1849, 10.1139/z02-175

2001, Evolution, 55, 131, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01279.x

2000, Genetics, 155, 945, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945

1940, Am. Midl. Nat., 23, 733, 10.2307/2420457

1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 9197, 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9197

1995, J. Hered., 86, 248, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573

1999, J. Herpetol., 33, 45, 10.2307/1565542

1989, Evolution, 43, 223, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x

1997, Genetics, 145, 1219, 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1219

1997, Herpetol. Conserv., 1, 64

1995, Aust. J. Ecol., 20, 351, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00550.x

1998, Ecoscience, 5, 31, 10.1080/11956860.1998.11682436

1985, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 393, 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002141

1993, Evolution, 47, 264, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01215.x

1998, Mol. Ecol., 7, 381, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00308.x

2001, Evolution, 55, 2274, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00742.x

1999, Evolution, 53, 1857

1964, Zoology, 51, 51

2001, Genetics, 157, 911, 10.1093/genetics/157.2.911

2001, Mol. Ecol., 10, 53, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01184.x

1993, Hum. Mol. Genet., 2, 1123, 10.1093/hmg/2.8.1123

1984, Evolution, 38, 1358

1994, Oikos, 71, 215, 10.2307/3546269

1999, Heredity, 82, 117, 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960

2003, Genetics, 163, 1177, 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1177

1931, Genetics, 16, 97, 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97

1951, Ann. Eugen., 15, 323

2003, Evolution, 57, 1631, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00370.x