Effect of the air–sea coupled system change on the ENSO evolution from boreal spring

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - 2021
Xiaodong Fang1, Fei Zheng2
1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China
2International Center for Climate and Environment Science (ICCES), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractRealistic simulation and accurate prediction of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is still a challenge. One fundamental obstacle is the so-called spring predictability barrier (SPB), which features a low predictive skill of the ENSO with prediction across boreal spring. Our observational analysis shows that the leading empirical orthogonal function mode of the seasonal Niño3.4 index evolution (i.e., from May to the following April) explains nearly 90% of its total variance, and the principle component is almost identical to the Niño3.4 index in the mature phase. This means a good ENSO prediction for a year ranging May-next April can be achieved if the Niño3.4 index in the mature phase is accurately obtained in advance. In this work, by extracting physically oriented variables in the spring, a linear regression approach that can reproduce the mature ENSO phases in observation is firstly proposed. Further investigation indicates that the specific equation, however, is significantly modulated by an interdecadal regime shift in the air–sea coupled system in the tropical Pacific. During 1980–1999, ocean adjustment and vertical processes were dominant, and the recharge oscillator theory was effective to capture the ENSO evolutions. While, during 2000–2018, zonal advection and thermodynamics became important, and successful prediction essentially relies on the wind stress information and their controlled processes, both zonally and meridionally. These results imply that accounting for the interdecadal regime shift of the tropical Pacific coupled system and the dominant processes in spring in modulating the ENSO evolution could reduce the impact of SPB and improve ENSO prediction.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson BT, Perez RC, Karspeck A (2013) Triggering of El Niño onset through trade wind-induced charging of the equatorial Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 40:1212–1216

Barnston AG, Tippett MK, L’Heureux ML, Li SH, Dewitt DG (2012) Skill of real-time seasonal ENSO model predictions during 2002–11: is our capability increasing? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:631–651

Behringer D, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: the Pacific Ocean. In: Eighth symposium on integrated observing and assimilation systems for atmosphere, oceans, and land surface, AMS 84th annual meeting, edited. Washington State Convention and Trade Center, Seattle, Washington

Bunge L, Clarke AJ (2014) On the warm water volume and its changing relationship with ENSO. J Phys Oceanogr 44:1372–1385

Chen HC, Tseng YH, Hu ZZ, Ding RQ (2020) Enhancing the ENSO predictability beyond the spring barrier. Sci Rep 10:984

Clarke AJ, van Gorder S (2001) ENSO prediction using an ENSO trigger and a proxy for Western Equatorial Pacific Warm Pool Movement. Geophys Res Lett 28:579–582

Clarke AJ, Zhang XL (2019) On the physics of the warm water volume and El Niño/La Niña predictability. J Phys Oceanogr 49:1541–1560

Clement A, DiNezio P, Deser C (2011) Rethinking the ocean’s role in the Southern Oscillation. J Clim 24:4056–4072

England MH, McGregor S, Spence P, Meehl GA, Timmermann A, Cai W, Gupta AS, McPhaden MJ, Purich A, Santoso A (2014) Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus. Nat Clim Change 4:222–227

Fang XH, Mu M (2018) A three-region conceptual model for central Pacific El Niño including zonal advective feedback. J Clim 31:4965–4979

Fang XH, Xie RH (2020) A brief review of ENSO theories and prediction. Sci China Earth Sci 63:476–491

Fang XH, Zheng F (2018) Simulating Eastern- and Central-Pacific type ENSO using a simple coupled model. Adv Atmos Sci 35:671–681

Fang XH, Zheng F, Zhu J (2015) The cloud-radiative effect when simulating strength asymmetry in two types of El Niño events using CMIP5 models. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:4357–4369

Fang XH, Zheng F, Liu ZY, Zhu J (2019) Decadal modulation of ENSO spring persistence barrier by thermal damping processes in the observation. Geophys Res Lett 46:6892–6899

Horll T, Uekl I, Hanawa K (2012) Breakdown of ENSO predictors in the 2000s: Decadal changes of recharge/discharge–SST phase relation and atmospheric intraseasonal forcing. Geophys Res Lett 39:L10707

Hu SN, Fedorov AV (2018) Cross-equatorial winds control El Niño diversity and change. Nat Clim Change 8:798–802

Hu ZZ, Kumar A, Ren HL, Wang H, L’Heureux M, Jin FF (2013) Weakened interannual variability in the tropical Pacific Ocean since 2000. J Clim 26:2601–2613

Hu ZZ, Kumar A, Zhu JS, Huang BH, Tseng YH, Wang XC (2017) On the shortening of the lead time of ocean warm water volume to ENSO SST since 2000. Sci Rep 7:4294

Hu ZZ, Kumar A, Zhu JS, Peng P, Huang BH (2019) On the challenge for ENSO cycle prediction: an example from NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2. J Clim 32:183–194

Hu ZZ, Kumar A, Huang BH, Zhu JS, L’Heureux M, McPhaden MJ, Yu JY (2020) The interdecadal shift of ENSO properties in 1999/2000: a review. J Clim 33:4441–4462

Jin FF (1997) An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO. Part I: conceptual model. J Atmos Sci 54:811–829

Kang IS, Kug JS (2002) El Niño and La Niña sea surface temperature anomalies: asymmetry characteristics associated with their wind stress anomalies. J Phys Oceanogr 107:4372

Kao HY, Yu JY (2009) Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO. J Clim 22:615–632

Kug JS, Jin FF, An SI (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Clim 22:1499–1515

Kumar A, Hu ZZ (2014a) Interannual and interdecadal variability of ocean temperature along the equatorial Pacific in conjunction with ENSO. Clim Dyn 42:1243–1258

Kumar A, Hu ZZ (2014b) How variable is the uncertainty in ENSO sea surface temperature prediction? J Clim 27:2779–2788

Lai AWC, Herzog M, Graf HF (2018) ENSO forecasts near the spring predictability barrier and possible reasons for the recently reduced predictability. J Clim 31:815–838

Lee T, McPhaden MJ (2010) Increasing intensity of El Niño in the central-equatorial Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14603

Li X, Hu ZZ, Becker E (2019) On the westward shift of tropical Pacific climate variability since 2000. Clim Dyn 53:2905–2918

Li X, Hu ZZ, Huang B, Jin FF (2020) On the interdecadal variation of the warm water volume in the tropical Pacific around 1999/2000. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033306

Liu ZY, Jin YS, Rong XY (2019) A theory for the seasonal predictability barrier: threshold, timing, and intensity. J Clim 32:423–443

Lu FY, Liu ZY (2018) Assessing extratropical influence on observed El Niño-Southern Oscillation events using regional coupled data assimilation. J Clim 31:8961–8969

Lübbecke JF, McPhaden MJ (2014) Assessing the 21st century shift in ENSO variability in terms of the Bjerknes stability index. J Clim 27:2577–2587

McPhaden MJ (2003) Tropical Pacific Ocean heat content variations and ENSO persistence barriers. Geophys Res Lett 30:1480

McPhaden MJ (2012) A 21st century shift in the relationship between ENSO SST and warm water volume anomalies. Geophys Res Lett 39:L09706

McPhaden MJ, Zebiak SE, Glantz MH (2006) ENSO as an integrating concept in earth science. Science 314:1740–1745

Mu M, Duan WS, Wang B (2007a) Season-dependent dynamics of nonlinear optimal error growth and El Niño-Southern Oscillation predictability in a theoretical model. J Geophys Res Atmos 112:D10113

Mu M, Xu H, Duan WS (2007b) A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in Zebiak–Cane model. Geophys Res Lett 34:L03709

Rasmusson EM, Carpenter TH (1982) Variations in tropical sea surface temperature and surface wind fields associated with the Southern Oscillation/El Nino. Mon Weather Rev 110:354–384

Ren HL, Jin FF (2013) Recharge oscillator mechanisms in two types of ENSO. J Clim 26:6506–6523

Ropelewski CR, Halpert MS (1987) Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 115:985–996

Wang B, Luo X, Yang YM, Sun WY, Cane MA, Cai WJ, Yeh SW, Liu J (2019) Historical change of El Niño properties sheds light on future changes of extreme El Niño. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:22512–22517

Wang B, Luo X, Sun WY, Yang YM, Liu J (2020) El Niño diversity across boreal spring predictability barrier. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087354

Webster PJ, Yang S (1992) Monsoon and ENSO: selectively interactive systems. Q J R Meteorol Soc 118:877–926

Xiang BQ, Wang B, Li T (2013) A new paradigm for predominance of standing Central Pacific Warming after the late 1990s. Clim Dyn 41:327–340

Xie SP, Peng QH, Kamae Y, Zheng XT, Tokinaga H, Wang DX (2018) Eastern Pacific ITCZ dipole and ENSO diversity. J Clim 31:4449–4462

Yang ZY, Fang XH, Mu M (2020) The optimal precursor of El Niño in the GFDL CM2p1 model. J Geophys Res Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015797

Yeh SW, Kug JS, An SI (2014) Recent progress on two types of El Niño: observations, dynamics, and future changes. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 50:69–81

Yu JY, Kim ST (2011) Relationships between extratropical sea level pressure variations and the central Pacific and eastern Pacific types of ENSO. J Clim 24:708–720

Zheng F, Zhu J (2010a) Spring predictability barrier of ENSO events from the perspective of an ensemble prediction system. Glob Planet Change 72:108–117

Zheng F, Zhu J (2010b) Coupled assimilation for an intermediated coupled ENSO prediction model. Ocean Dyn 60:1061–1073

Zheng F, Fang XH, Yu JY, Zhu J (2014) Asymmetry of the Bjerknes positive feedback between the two types of El Niño. Geophys Res Lett 41:7651–7657

Zheng F, Fang XH, Zhu J, Yu JY, Li XC (2016) Modulation of Bjerknes feedback on the decadal variations in ENSO predictability. Geophys Res Lett 43:12560–12568

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Thông tin tác giả