Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process

Information Sciences - Tập 358 - Trang 191-207 - 2016
Wei Zhou1,2, Zeshui Xu2
1International Business School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, PR China
2Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, PR China

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bedregal, 2014, Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms, Inf. Sci., 255, 82, 10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.024 Bedregal, 2014, Typical hesitant fuzzy negations, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29, 525, 10.1002/int.21655 Belton, 1996, Remarks on the application of the analytic hierarchy process to judgmental forecasting, Int. J. Forecast., 12, 155, 10.1016/0169-2070(95)00643-5 Bustince, 2000, Mathematical analysis of interval-valued fuzzy relations: application to approximate reasoning, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 113, 205, 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00020-7 Chen, 2013, Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making, Knowl. Based Syst., 37, 528, 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.09.009 Crawford, 1985, A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices, J. Math. Psychol., 29, 387, 10.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1 Dong, 2013, Numerical scales generated individually for analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 229, 654, 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.019 Dong, 2008, A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 186, 229, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.044 Elliott, 2010, Selecting numerical scales for pairwise comparisons, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 95, 750, 10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.013 Finan, 1999, Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 112, 367, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00411-6 Harker, 1987, The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process, Manag. Sci., 33, 1383, 10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383 Ji, 2003, Scale transitivity in the AHP, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 54, 896, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601557 Kumar, 1996, A simulation-based evaluation of the approximate and the exact eigenvector methods employed in AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95, 656, 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00302-9 Liu, 2009, Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 160, 2686, 10.1016/j.fss.2009.01.010 Ma, 1999, 9/9-9/1 scale method of AHP, 197 Orlovsky, 1978, Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1, 155, 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90001-5 Rodríguez, 2016, A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making: towards high quality progress, Inf. Fusion, 29, 89, 10.1016/j.inffus.2015.11.004 Rodríguez, 2014, Hesitant fuzzy sets: state of the art and future directions, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 29, 495, 10.1002/int.21654 Saaty, 1977, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math. Psychol., 15, 234, 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 Saaty, 2004, Decision making - the analytic hierarchy and network process (AHP/ANP), J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 13, 1, 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5 Saaty, 2008, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1, 83 Saaty, 1990, How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48, 9, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I Saaty, 1980, The analytic hierarchy process, 189 Saaty, 2013, The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the AHP/ANP approach, Oper. Res., 61, 1101, 10.1287/opre.2013.1197 Salo, 2002, On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process, J. Multi Criteria Decis. Anal., 6, 309, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2 Srdjevic, 2005, Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis, Comput. Oper. Res., 32, 1897, 10.1016/j.cor.2003.12.005 Torra, 2010, Hesitant fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 25, 529 Torra, 2009, On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision, 1378 Wang, 1989 Xia, 2013, Group decision making based on intuitionistic multiplicative aggregation operators, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 5120, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.029 Xia, 2013, Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 21, 113, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2202907 Xia, 2011, Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 52, 395, 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002 Xu, 2014, Consistency test and weight generation for additive interval fuzzy preference relations, Soft Comput., 18, 1499, 10.1007/s00500-013-1156-x Xu, 2009, Normalizing rank aggregation method for priority of a fuzzy preference relation and its effectiveness, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 50, 1287, 10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.008 Xu, 2001, Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix, J. Syst. Eng., 16, 311 Xu, 2004, Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 36, 261, 10.1016/j.ijar.2003.10.011 Xu, 2009, Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., 8, 123, 10.1007/s10700-009-9056-3 Zhang, 2014, A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant multiplicative preference relations, Inf. Sci., 282, 136, 10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.057 Zhu, 2014, Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 22, 35, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2245136 Zhu, 2013, Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 44, 1328, 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2283021