Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis

Allan, G., McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., Turner, K.R., 2004. Construction of a multi-sectoral inter-regional IO and SAM database for the UK. mimeo, Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 04–22. Allan, G., Hanley, N.D., McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., Turner, K.R., in press. Augmenting the Input–Output Framework for “Common Pool” Resources: Operationalising the Full Leontief Environmental Model, Economic Systems Research, 19. Barrett, J., Birch, R., Cherrett, N., Wiedmann, T., 2005. Reducing Wales' Ecological Footprint — Main Report. Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York; published by WWF Cymru, Cardiff, UK; March 2005.http://www.walesfootprint.org. Bastianoni, 2004, The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions, Ecological Economics, 49, 253, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.018 Bicknell, 1998, New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy, Ecological Economics, 27, 149, 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00136-5 Birch, 2004 Dimaranan, Betina, V., McDougall, Robert A., 2005. Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 6 Data Base. Dimaranan, Betina V. and McDougall, Robert A. Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis. Eder, 1999, What environmental pressures are a region's industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input–output models, Ecological Economics, 29, 359, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00092-5 Eurostat, 2003, International trade in services 1992–2001 FAO, 2005 Ferng, 2001, Using composition of land multiplier to estimate Ecological Footprints associated with production activity, Ecological Economics, 37, 159, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00292-5 Ferng, 2002, Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints, Ecological Economics, 40, 53, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00270-1 Ferng, 2003, Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit, Ecological Economics, 46, 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00104-6 Flegg, 1995, On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input–output tables, Regional Studies, 29, 547, 10.1080/00343409512331349173 GFN, 2005 Harrigan, 1980, Simulating the structure of a regional economy, Environment and Planning. A, 12, 10.1068/a120927 Harrigan, 1980, A comparison of regional and national technical structures, Economic Journal, 90, 10.2307/2231743 Hayami, 1997, An input–output analysis on Japan–China environmental problem: compilation of the input–output table for the analysis of energy and air pollutants, Journal of Applied Input–Output Analysis, 4, 23 Hayami, 1999, The emission of global warming gases: trade between Canada and Japan Hoekstra, 2006, Environmental responsibility and policy in a two-country dynamic input–output model, Economic Systems Research, 18, 61, 10.1080/09535310500440894 Hubacek, 2003, Applying physical input–output analysis to estimate land appropriation (Ecological Footprints) of international trade activities, Ecological Economics, 44, 137, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00257-4 Isserman, 1980, Estimating export activity in a regional economy: a theoretical and empirical analysis of alternative methods, International Regional Science Review, 5, 155, 10.1177/016001768000500204 Kondo, 1998, CO2 emissions in Japan. Influences of imports and exports, Applied Energy, 59, 163, 10.1016/S0306-2619(98)00011-7 Lenzen, 1998, Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis, Energy Policy, 26, 495, 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00012-3 Lenzen, 2004, CO2 multipliers in single-region and multi-region input–output models, Economic Systems Research, 16, 391, 10.1080/0953531042000304272 Lenzen, 2001, A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia, Ecological Economics, 37, 229, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00275-5 Lenzen, 2005 Leontief, 1970, Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input–output approach, Review of Economic Statistics, 52, 262, 10.2307/1926294 Machado, 2001, Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input–output approach, Ecological Economics, 39, 409, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00230-0 McCann, 1998, Regional size, industrial location and input–output expenditure coefficients, Regional Studies, 32, 435, 10.1080/00343409850116835 McDonald, G.W., Patterson, M.G., 2003. Ecological Footprints of New Zealand and its Regions, 1997/98. Technical Paper, Environmental Reporting, Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, September 2003. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/ser/eco-footprint-sep03/html or via http://www.environment.govt.nz. McDonald, 2004, Ecological Footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions, Ecological Economics, 50, 49, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.008 McDonald, 2006, Treading lightly: Ecofootprints of New Zealand's ageing population, Ecological Economics, 56, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.019 McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., Turner, K., 2004a. ‘The environmental ‘trade balance’ between Scotland and the rest of the UK: an inter-regional input–output and SAM analysis’, mimeo, Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics, 04­21. McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., Turner, K.R., 2004b. ‘An Input–Output Based Alternative to ‘Ecological Footprints’ for Tracking Pollution Generation in a Small Open Economy’, mimeo, Strathclyde Papers in Economics, 04/04. Miller, 1985 Minx, 2006, Let's get physical! About the relevance of physical information in an input–output format Monfreda, 2004, Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity accounts, Land Use Policy, 21, 231, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.009 Mongelli, 2006, Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input–output approach to the Italian case, Energy Policy, 34, 88, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.004 Munksgaard, 2001, CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility?, Energy Policy, 29, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00120-8 Office for National Statistics, 2002 Pain, N., Mourougane, A., Sédillot, F., Le Fouler, L., 2005. The New OECD International Trade Model, 2005. ECO/WKP(2005)27, Economics Department Working Papers No. 440. 2005. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Economics Department Working Papers. Peters, 2006, The importance of imports for household environmental impacts, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10, 89, 10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.89 Peters, G.P., Hertwich, E.G., in press. The application of multi-regional input–output analysis to industrial ecology: evaluating trans-boundary environmental impacts. In: S. Suh (Editor), Handbook on Input–output Economics for Industrial Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. Proops, 1999, International trade and the sustainability footprint: a practical criterion for its assessment, Ecological Economics, 28, 75, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00030-5 Richardson, 1985, Input–output and economic base multipliers: looking backward and forward, Journal of Regional Science, 25, 607, 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1985.tb00325.x Round, 1983, Non-survey techniques: a critical review of the theory and the evidence, International Regional Science Review, 8, 189, 10.1177/016001768300800302 Sánchez-Chóliz, 2004, CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain, Energy Policy, 32, 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00199-X Schaeffer, 1996, The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports, Energy Conversion and Management, 37, 955, 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00283-9 Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 1996. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories — Reporting Instructions (Volume 1). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Report, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs4.htm (Tokyo, Japan). Turner, 2006, The additional precision provided by regional-specific data: the identification of fuel-use and pollution generation coefficients in the Jersey economy, Regional Studies, 40, 347, 10.1080/00343400600725194 UN Comtrade, 2005 United Nations, 2003, Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003 Wackernagel, 1996 Wackernagel Weisz, H., Duchin, F., 2006. Physical and monetary input–output analysis: what makes the difference? Ecological Economics (in press, corrected proof). Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., in press. On the conversion between local and global hectares in Ecological Footprint analysis. Ecological Economics. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., Barrett, J., in press. Examining the Global Environmental Impact of Regional Consumption Activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003) Wiedmann, 2006, Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis, Ecological Economics, 56, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.012 WWF WWF-UK, 2006. Counting consumption — CO2 emissions, material flows and Ecological Footprint of the UK by region and devolved country; SEI — University of York, CURE — University of Manchester and WWF-UK, Godalming, UK; www.ecologicalbudget.org.uk Wyckoff, 1994, The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions, Energy Policy, 22, 187, 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90158-9 Yamano, 2006, The OECD's Input–Output Database — 2006 Edition