Risk and safety considerations of genome edited crops: Expert opinion

Agapito-Tenfen, 2016 Agapito-Tenfen, S.Z. and O.G. Wikmark, Current status of emerging technologies for plant breeding: Biosafety and knowledge gaps of site directed nucleases and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Biosafety Report 2015/02. GenØk, 2015. Anderson, 2012, London, London: Springer London., 119-126 Araki, 2015, Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing, Trends Plant Sci., 20, 145, 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010 BelgianBiosafetyServer. Targeted genome editing. 2018. Bhattachary Bourguignon Brookes, 2018, Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2016: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions, GM Crops & Food, 9, 109, 10.1080/21645698.2018.1476792 Burgos, 2014, The impact of herbicide-resistant Rice technology on phenotypic diversity and population structure of United States weedy Rice, Plant Physiol., 166, 1208, 10.1104/pp.114.242719 Busconi, 2012, Spread of herbicide-resistant weedy rice (red rice, Oryza sativa L.) after 5years of Clearfield rice cultivation in Italy, Plant Biol., 14, 751, 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00570.x Calyxt, I., First Commercial Sale of Calyxt High Oleic Soybean Oil on the U.S. Market. 2019, Calyxt, Inc. http://www.calyxt.com/first-commercial-sale-of-calyxt-high-oleic-soybean-oil-on-the-u-s-market/: Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn. Carroll, 2015, The societal opportunities and challenges of genome editing, Genome Biol., 16, 10.1186/s13059-015-0812-0 CAST, C.f.A.S.a.T., Genome Editing in Agriculture: Methods, Applications, and Governance—A paper in the series on The Need for Agricultural Innovation to Sustainably Feed the World by 2050. Issue Paper 60. CAST, Ames, Iowa. 2018. Christ, 2018, Contribution of untargeted metabolomics for future assessment of biotech crops, Trends Plant Sci., 23, 1047, 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.09.011 CJEU, Judgment Of the Court (Grand Chamber): Mutagenesis — Directive 2001/18/EC, Interpretation and assessment of validity — Notion of ‘genetically modified organism’ — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — New techniques of mutagenesis implementing genetic engineering processes — Random and directed mutagenesis — Scope of the exemption — Degree of harmonisation — Precautionary principle, C.o.J.o.t.E. Union, Editor. 2018: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?num=C-528/16#. Deng, 2013, Handling attrition in longitudinal studies: the case for refreshment samples, Stat. Sci., 28, 238, 10.1214/13-STS414 EC. Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. 2000 [cited 2019 January 14]; Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0001&from=EN Entman, 1993, Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, J. Commun., 43, 51, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Fears, 2018, Assessing security implications of genome editing: emerging points from an international workshop, Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 6, 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00034 Fortuna, G., 14 EU countries call for ‘unified approach’ to gene editing in plants, in EURACTIV.com. 2019, EURACTIV.com: The Netherlands. Fu, 2018, Reduced framing effect: experience adjusts affective forecasting with losses, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 76, 231, 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.006 Garnett, 2017, Multi-case review of the application of the precautionary principle in European Union law and case law, Risk Anal., 37, 502, 10.1111/risa.12633 Gressel, 2009, A strategy to provide long-term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds, Pest Manag. Sci., 65, 723, 10.1002/ps.1754 Hajer, 2003, Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void, Policy. Sci., 36, 175, 10.1023/A:1024834510939 Hallahan, 1999, Seven models of framing: implications for public relations, J. Public Relat. Res., 11, 205, 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02 Hartley, 2016, Essential features of responsible governance of agricultural biotechnology, PLoS Biol., 14, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002453 Helliwell, 2017, And L. O' Neill, Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?, EMBO Rep., 18, 2090, 10.15252/embr.201744385 Jinek, M., A. East, A. Cheng, S. Lin, E. Ma, and J. Doudna, RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. elife, 2013. 2: p. e00471. Kanchiswamy, 2016, Fine-tuning next-generation genome editing tools, Trends Biotechnol., 34, 562, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.007 Kangmennaang, 2016, Genetically modified organisms and the age of (un) reason? A critical examination of the rhetoric in the GMO public policy debates in Ghana, Futures, 83, 37, 10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.002 Kerr, 2018, The limits of responsible innovation: exploring care, vulnerability and precision medicine, Technol. Soc., 52, 24, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.03.004 Khandagale, 2016, Genome editing for targeted improvement of plants, Plant Biotechnology Reports, 10, 327, 10.1007/s11816-016-0417-4 Lassoued, 2018, Front. Plant Sci., 9(1291) Lassoued, 2018, 14(4) Lassoued, R., P.W.B. Phillips, S.J. Smyth, and H. Hesseln, Estimating the cost of regulating genome edited crops: expert judgment and overconfidence. GM Crops & Food, 2019a: p. 1–19. Lassoued, 2019, Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion, Transgenic Res., 28, 247, 10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5 Lubieniechi, 2016, Expert and lay public Risk preferences regarding plants with novel traits, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie, 64, 717, 10.1111/cjag.12110 Marchant, 2001, The precautionary principle: an 'unprincipled' approach to biotechnology regulation, Journal of Risk Research, 4, 143, 10.1080/136698701750128088 Marden, 2002, Risk and regulation: US regulatory policy on genetically modified food and agriculture, BCL Rev., 44, 733 Marris, 2015, The construction of imaginaries of the public as a threat to synthetic biology, Sci. Cult., 24, 83, 10.1080/09505431.2014.986320 Martin, 2012, Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science, Conserv. Biol., 26, 29, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01806.x Miao, 2018, Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote rice growth and productivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115, 6058, 10.1073/pnas.1804774115 Mitcham, 2003, Co-responsibility for research integrity, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 9, 273, 10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0 Nekrasov, 2013, Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 691, 10.1038/nbt.2655 OECD, 2003 Pfeiffer, M., F. Quétier, and A. Ricroch, Chapter Eight - Genome Editing in Agricultural Biotechnology, in Advances in Botanical Research, M. Kuntz, Editor. 2018, Academic Press. p. 245-286. Roberts, 2018, The Nobel Laureates' campaign supporting GMOs, J. Innov. Knowl., 3, 61, 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.006 SAM, New techniques in agricultural biotechnology, E.C.H.L.G.o.t.S.A. Mechanism, Editor. 2017, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. Sarewitz, 2015, Science can't solve it, Nature, 522, 413, 10.1038/522413a 2010 Smyth, 2019, Global status of the regulation of genome editing technologies, CAB Reviews, 14, 1, 10.1079/PAVSNNR201914021 Stilgoe, 2013, Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Res. Policy, 42, 1568, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 Stirling, 2007, A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society, J. R. Soc. Interface, 4, 707, 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213 Sudianto, 2013, Clearfield® rice: its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective, Crop Prot., 49, 40, 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.013 Tosun, 2013, How the EU handles uncertain risks: understanding the role of the precautionary principle, Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 1517, 10.1080/13501763.2013.834549 Turksen, K., ed. Genome Editing. 2016, Springer: Switzerland. 171. Tversky, 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211, 453, 10.1126/science.7455683 (UNEP), U.N.E.P., Summary Report on the Survey on the Application of and Experience in the Use of Socio-Economic Considerations in Decision-Making on Living Modified Organisms, in UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/5/INF/10. 2010, https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/UNEP_CBD_BS_COP_MOP_5_17-E.pdf (Accessed on 20 March 2019): Nagoya, Japan. van den Belt, 2003, Debating the precautionary principle: "guilty until proven innocent" or "innocent until proven guilty"?, Plant Physiol., 132, 1122, 10.1104/pp.103.023531 van den Daele, W., A. Puhler, and H. Sukopp, Transgenic Herbicide- Resistant Crops: A Participatory Technology Assessment. Summary Report, in Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 97–302. 1997: Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB). Von Schomberg, R., A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation, in Responsible Innovation. Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, M.H.a.J.B. R. Owen, Editor. 2013, John Wiley: London. p. 51–74. Waltz, 2016, Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation, Nature, 532, 293, 10.1038/nature.2016.19754 Wang, 2014, Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 947, 10.1038/nbt.2969 Wieczorek, 2012, History of agricultural biotechnology: how crop development has evolved, Nature Education Knowledge, 3, 9 Woo, 2015, DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 1162, 10.1038/nbt.3389 Xie, 2014, Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops, Mol. Plant, 7, 923, 10.1093/mp/ssu009 Yamamoto, 2015, Ed. Targeted Genome Editing Using Site-Specific Nucleases : ZFNs, TALENs, and the CRISPR/Cas9 System, Springer: Tokyo. Zhang, 2018, Potential high-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in Arabidopsis and its prevention, Plant Mol. Biol., 96, 445, 10.1007/s11103-018-0709-x Zhang, 2015, Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering, Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, 4, 10.1038/mtna.2015.37 Zhao, 2017, Risk associated with off-target plant genome editing and methods for its limitation, Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, 1, 231, 10.1042/ETLS20170037