Water supply management using an extended group fuzzy decision-making method: a case study in north-eastern Iran
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this study was to develop a group fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method to be applied in rating problems associated with water resources management. Thus, here Chen’s group fuzzy TOPSIS method extended by a difference technique to handle uncertainties of applying a group decision making. Then, the extended group fuzzy TOPSIS method combined with a consistency check. In the presented method, initially linguistic judgments are being surveyed via a consistency checking process, and afterward these judgments are being used in the extended Chen’s fuzzy TOPSIS method. Here, each expert’s opinion is turned to accurate mathematical numbers and, then, to apply uncertainties, the opinions of group are turned to fuzzy numbers using three mathematical operators. The proposed method is applied to select the optimal strategy for the rural water supply of Nohoor village in north-eastern Iran, as a case study and illustrated example. Sensitivity analyses test over results and comparing results with project reality showed that proposed method offered good results for water resources projects.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M (2005) Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Res Pl ASCE 131:326–335
Afshar A, Mariño MA, Saadatpour M, Afshar A (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun Reservoirs System. Water Resour Manage 25:545–563
Anand Raj P (1995) Multicriteria methods in river basin planning—a case study. Water Sci Technol 31(8):261–272
Anane M, Bouziri L, Limam A, Jellali S (2012) Ranking suitable sites for irrigation with reclaimed water in the Nabeul-Hammamet region (Tunisia) using GIS and AHP-multicriteria decision analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 65:36–46
Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman N (1966) Manual de reference du programme electre. Note De Synthese et Formaton, 25th edn. Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris
Bender MJ, Simonovic SP (2000) A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):35–44
Benitez JM, Martin JC, Roman C (2007) Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tour Manag 28:544–555
Bojan S (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42:2261–2273
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York
Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9
Chen Z, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Listowski A, O’Halloran K, Thompson M, Muthukaruppan M (2012) Multi-criteria analysis towards the new end use of recycled water for household laundry: a case study in Sydney. Sci Total Environ 438(1):59–65
Chu TC (2002) Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:859–864
Chu TC, Lin YC (2003) A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:284–290
Cooper WW, Sieford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Czyżak P, Skowiiński R (1996) Possibilistic construction of fuzzy outranking relation for multiple-criteria ranking. Fuzzy Sets Syst 81(1):123–131
Deng JL (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1:1–24
Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Zavadskas EK (2012) Risk evaluation of tunneling projects. Arch Civ Mech Eng 12(1):1–12
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin
Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Izadikhah M (2006) Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl Math Comput 181:1544–1551
Janssen R (1996) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
Kahraman C, Çevik S, Ates NY, Gülbay M (2007) Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems. Comput Ind Eng 52:414–433
Khodabakhshi B, Jafari HR (2011) Application of fuzzy ELECTRE TRI method for determination of environmental impact significance of water resource development projects (The case of Ardebil dam, drainage and irrigation network project). Environ Res 1(2):31–42
Kodikara PN, Perera BJC, Kularathna MDUP (2010) Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis—a case study on urban water supply. Eur J Oper Res 206(1):209–220
Lee CS, Wen CG (1997) Fuzzy goal programming approach for water quality management in a river basin. Fuzzy Sets Syst 89(2):181–192
Minatour Y, Khazaei J, Ataei M (2012) Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study in the west of Iran. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x
Nasiri H, Darvishi Boloorani A, Faraji Sabokbar HA, Jafari HR, Hamzeh M, Rafii Y (2013) Determining the most suitable areas for artificial groundwater recharge via an integrated PROMETHEE II-AHP method in GIS environment (case study: Garabaygan Basin, Iran). Environ Monit Assess 185(1):707–718
Nitirach S, Vilas N (2011) Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: a case from Thailand. Desalination 268:141–149
Onut S, Soner S (2008) Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manag 28:1552–1559
Opricovic S (1998) Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade
Opricovic S (2011) Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12983–12990
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 17:211–220
Panagopoulos GP, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Martsouka FA (2012) Mapping urban water demands using multi-criteria analysis and GIS. Water Resour Manag 26(5):1347–1363
Prodanovic P, Simonovic SP (2002) Comparison of fuzzy set ranking methods for implementation in water resources decision-making. Can J Civ Eng 29(5):692–701
Razavi Toosi SL, Samani JMV (1999) Evaluating water transfer projects using analytic network process (ANP). Water Resour Manag 26(7):1999–2014
Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples: la methode ELECTRE. RIRO 8:57–75
Roy B (1978) ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférencesen présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du CERO 20:3–24
Roy B, Bertier P (1973) La methode Electre II: Une application au media-planing. In: Ross M (ed) Vlleme Conference Internationale de Recherche Operationnelle, Dublin, OR72, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 291–302
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Simon U, Brüggemann R, Pudenz S (2004) Aspects of decision support in water management—example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I—spatially differentiated evaluation. Water Res 38(7):1809–1816
Sun C, Lin GTR (2009) Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Syst Appl 36:11764–11771
Triantaphyllou E, Lin CT (1996) Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods. Int J Approx Reason 14:281–310
Wang TC, Chang TH (2007) Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 33:870–880
Wang YM, Elhag TMS (2006) Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl 31:309–319
Wang YJ, Lee HS (2007) Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput Math Appl 53:1762–1772
Wei LH, Jing LY, Wu W, Mou L (2011) Research on security assessment model of water supply system based on leakage control. Procedia Environ Sci 11:749–756
Yang T, Hung CC (2007) Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23:126–137
Zarghami M, Abrishamchi A, Ardakanian R (2008a) Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manage 22(8):1017–1029
Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F, Ardakanian R (2008b) A fuzzy-stochastic OWA model for robust multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 7(1):1–15
Zekri S, Romero C (1993) Public and private compromises in agricultural water management. J Environ Manage 37(4):281–290
Zou Q, Zhou J, Zhou C, Song L, Guo J (2013) Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(2):525–546