Case-based Mutual Learning Sessions: knowledge integration and transfer in transdisciplinary processes

Sustainability Science - Tập 10 - Trang 563-580 - 2015
Ulli Vilsmaier1,2, Moritz Engbers1,2, Philip Luthardt2, Rina Marie Maas-Deipenbrock3, Sebastian Wunderlich4, Roland W. Scholz5,6
1Center for Methods, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
2Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
3Institute of Corporate Development, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
4School of Computing Science, Business Administration, Economics, and Law, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
5Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany
6Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Mutual learning is a fundamental element in transdisciplinary (Td) sustainability research. It allows for integrating knowledge and experiences gained in different contexts, including the building of consensus about necessary transformations to reach sustainability solutions. To successfully achieve mutual learning, appropriate conditions are required. These range from providing boundary objects that serve knowledge integration, the development of a common language and knowledge, and shared experiences to transparency concerning the objectives and motives of all those involved. Mutual learning is particularly challenging from an intercultural perspective in both local and global processes. Interaction among the participants is based on experiential, educational, and cultural dimensions that induce different types of knowledge and cognition, thought styles, socializations, constraints and preferences in socio-political structures and day-to-day practices. In this article, formats of case-based Mutual Learning Sessions (cbMLS) that organize mutual learning based on a single case or a set of cases are presented. The different formats have been developed and studied in the context of a global Td process on phosphorus management (i.e., the Global TraPs project). After presenting the formats of cbMLS, the paper presents the first results from an empirical, integrated qualitative study based on interviews and observations, and discusses potentials and limitations of cbMLS, in particular their application in an international context. We further highlight challenges and learning experiences that have to be met in Td mutual learning processes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baccini P, Oswald F (2008) Designing the urban: linking physiology and morphology. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 79–88 Bammer G (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecology and Society 10(2):6. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/ Bell S, Morse S (2010) Rich pictures: a means to explore the sustainable mind? Sustain Dev 21(1):30–47 Berger González M (2015) Towards relating Maya and contemporary conceptions of cancer: a transdisciplinary process to foster intercultural scientific exchange. ETH Zurich, Zurich Bergmann M, Jahn T, Knobloch T, Krohn W, Pohl C, Schramm E (2012) Methods for transdisciplinary research: a primer for practice. Campus, Frankfurt, New York Bhabha HK (1994) The location of culture. Routledge, Abingdon Bohnsack R (2004) Group discussion and focus groups. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I (eds) A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 214–221 Boix-Mansilla V, Chua F, van Breda J (2010) Case study: incremental upgrading of Ekanini? The iShack initiative. Interdisciplines. http://www.interdisciplines.eu/paper.php?paperID=292) Bunders JGG, Reeger BJ (2009) Knowledge co-creation: interaction between science and society. Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment, Den Haag Bunders JFG, Broerse JEW, Keil F, Pohl C, Scholz RW, Zweekhorst MBM (2010) How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? In: Veld RJ (ed) Knowledge democracy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 125–152 Connon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Individual and group decision making. In: Castellan NJ (ed) Individual and group decision making. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale Copei F (1969) Der fruchtbare Moment im Bildungsprozeß. Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg Eilittä M (2012) The global TraPs project transdisciplinary processes for sustainable phosphorus management. ETH Zürich, Zurich Elzinga A (2008) Participation. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U (eds) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 345–359 Fisher R, Brown S (1988) Getting together: building a relationship that gets to yes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston Fisher R, Ury W (1981) Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Houghton Mifflin, Boston Flick U (2009) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder, New York Geertz C (1983) The way we think now: toward an ethnography of modern thought. In: Geertz C (ed) Local knowledge: further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books, New York, pp 147–163 Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402:C81–C84 Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzmann S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, The ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York Global TraPs (2012) Newsletter 10. Retrieved 20 Dec 2014. http://www.globaltraps.ch/tl_files/pdf/newsletters/GT_Newsletter_10.pdf Global TraPs (2014) MLS & DS Forum. Home page: http://www.globaltraps.ch/MLS-DS.html. Accessed date 4 Feb 2015 Green AE, Kraemer DJM, Fugelsang JA, Gray JR, Dunbar KN (2012) Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38(2):264–272 Grießler E, Littig B (2003) Participatory technology assessment of xenotransplantation: experimenting with the Neo-Socratic Dialogue. Prac Philos 6:56–67 Häberli R, Bill A, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Klein J, Scholz RW, Welti M (2001) Synthesis. In: Klein J, Häberli R, Scholz RW, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Bill A, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 6–22 Hall S (1996) Introduction: Who needs identity? In: Hall S, Du Gay P (eds) Questions of cultural identity. Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, London, pp 1–17 Hamberger E (2004) Transdisciplinarity: a scientific essential. Ann NY Acad Sci 1028:487–496 Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud 14(3):575–599 Harris M (1991) Cultural anthropology. Harper Collins, New York Headland TN, Pike KL, Harris M (1990) Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Sage, Thousand Oaks Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A (2011) Qualitative research methods. Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U (eds) (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hirsch Hadorn G, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (2008) Idea of the handbook. In: Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E, Hirsch Hadorn G (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–18 Hollaender K, Loibl MC, Wilts A (2008) Management. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 385–397 Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10 Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O'Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642 Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (2001) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: an effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin Knorr-Cetina K (2007) Culture in global knowledge societies: knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisc Sci Rev 32(4):361–375 Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ) Krohn W (2008) Learning from Case Studies. In: Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E, Hirsch Hadorn G (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 369–383 Krohn W (2010) Interdisciplinary cases and disciplinary knowlege. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C (eds) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 31–49 Kuckartz U (2012) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary resarch in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43 Lawrence RJ, Després C (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4):397–405 Liu J, Mooney H, Hull V, Davis SJ, Gaskell J, Hertel T, Lubchenco J, Seto KC, Gleick P, Kremen C, Li S (2015) Systems integration for global sustainablity. Science 347(6225):1258832-1–1258832-9 Mayring P (2004) Qualitative content analysis. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds) A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 266–269 Moore HL, Sanders T (2006) Anthropology in theory: issues in epistemology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford, Carlton Morgan DL, Spanish MT (1984) Focus groups: a new tool for qualitative research. Qual Sociol 7(3):253–270 Nicolescu B (2008) In vitro and in vivo knowledge: methodology of transdisciplinary. In: Nicolescu B (ed) Transdisciplinarity: theory and practice. Hampton Press, Cresskill Njoroge R, Birech R, Korir M, Mutisya M, Scholz RW (2015) Transdisciplinary processes of developing, applying, and evaluating a method for improving smallholder farmers’ access to (phosphorus) fertilizers: The SMAP method. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0333-5 Osborn D, Cutter A, Ullah F (2015) Universal sustainable development goals: understanding the transformational challenges for developed countries. Report of a study by stakeholder forum. https://www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1684SF_-_SDG_Universality_Report_-_May_2015.pdf. Accessed date 21 Jul 2015 Piaget J (1977) The development of thought. Viking, New York Pohl C, van Kerkhoff L, Hirsch Hadorn G, Bammer G (2008) Integration. In: Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Hirsch Hadorn G (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 411–424 Polk M, Knutsson P (2008) Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 14(6):643–653 Reid WV, Chen D, Goldfarb L, Hackmann H, Lee YT, Mokhele K, Ostrom E, Raivio K, Rockström J, Schellnhuber HJ, Whyte A (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330:916–917 Rist S, Zimmermann A, Wiesmann U (2004) From epistemic monoculture to cooperation between epistemic communities—development research and sustainability. International Conference “Bridging Scales and Epistemologies”. Millennium Assessment, pp 17–20 Rose G (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Prog Hum Geogr 21:305–320 Roy AH, Scholz RW (2014) Seven focus areas of Global TraPs: 2012–2015. Glob TraPs Newslett 12:5–7. retrieved 12 Mar 2015 from http://www.globaltraps.ch/tl_files/pdf/newsletters/GT_Newsletter_12.pdf Schneidewind U (2013) Transformative literacy: understanding and shaping societal transformations. Gaia 22(2):82–86 Scholz RW (2000) Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity. In: Scholz RW, Häberli R, Bill A, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook II: mutual learning sessions. Haffmans Sachbuch Verlag, Zurich, pp 13–19 Scholz RW (2001) The mutual learning sessions. In: Thompson Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: an effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 117–129 Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Scholz RW (2012) Transdisziplinäre Krebsforschung mit den Mayas: Das Macocc Projekt—Body-Mind Komplementaritäten auf der Ebene der Zelle, des Patienten und der therapeutischen Allianz. EANU Spec 7:1–38 Scholz RW, Steiner G (2015) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4 Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage, Thousand Oaks Scholz RW, Vilsmaier U (2013) Tutorial to mutual learning sessions and dialogue sessions. Paper presented at the 1st Global TraPs World Conference, Beijing, China Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3):226–251 Scholz RW, Roy A, Hellums D (2014) Sustainable phosphorus management: a transdisciplinary challenge. In: Scholz RW, Roy A, Brand F, Hellums D, Ulrich A (eds) Sustainable phosphorus management: a global transdisciplinary roadmap. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–128 Shore B (1996) Culture in mind: cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford Smith P, Riley A (2009) Cultural theory: an introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability Science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287 Star S, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci 19(4):387–420 Sternberg RJ (1977) Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychol Rev 84(4):353–378 United Nations Development Group (2014) Delivering the post-2015 development agenda: opportunities at the national and local levels. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1909UNDP-MDG-Delivering-Post-2015-Report-2014.pdf. Accessed date 21 Jul 2015 Vilsmaier U, Scholz RW (2013) Plenary III: summary and outcomes from MLS and DS of June 18. Paper presented at the 1st Global TraPs World Conference Beijing, China von Kardorff E (2004) Qualitative evaluation research. In: Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I (eds) A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 137–142 Waldenfels B (2011) Phenomenology of the alien: basic concepts. Northwestern University Press, Evanston Walter A, Helgenberger S, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2007) Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. Eval Progr Plan 30(4):325–338 Wiesmann U, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Zemp E (2008) Enhancing transdisciplinary research: a synthesis in fifteen propositions. In: Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Hirsch Hadorn G (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 433–441 Witte EH (ed) (2001) Leistungsverbesserung in aufgabenorientierten Kleingruppen. Beiträge des 15. Hamburger Symposions zur Methodologie der Sozialpsychologie, Pabst, Lengerich Zierhofer W, Burger P (2007) Disentangling transdisciplinarity: an analysis of knowledge integration in problem-oriented research. Sci Stud 20(1):51–74 Zscheischler J, Rogga S (2014) Transdisciplinarity in land use science: a review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices. Futures 65:28–44