A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe

Journal of Forest Economics - Tập 15 - Trang 109-130 - 2009
Marianne Zandersen1,2, Richard S.J. Tol3,4,5
1Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change (FNU), Hamburg University & Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Science (ZMAW), Hamburg, Germany
2International Max Planck Research School Earth System Modelling (IMPRS-ESM), Hamburg, Germany
3Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland
4Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
5Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4602 Bateman, 2003, Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values, Land Economics, 79, 235, 10.2307/3146869 Bateman, 1996, Measurement issues in the travel cost method: a geographical information systems approach, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47, 191, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1996.tb00684.x Bateman, 1999, Developing a methodology for benefit transfers using geographical information systems: modelling demand for woodland recreation, Regional Studies, 33, 191, 10.1080/00343409950082391 Boatto, 1984 Bojö, J., 1985. Samhällsekonomisk analys av miljövärden i Valadalen. In: Kostnadsnyttoanalyd av fjällnära skogar. Fallet Valadalen, Research Report edn, 6:1-6:25. Ekonomiska Forskningsinstitutet vid Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm. Boxall, 1996, Backcountry recreationists’ valuation of forest and park management features in wilderness parks of the western Canadian shield, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 982, 10.1139/x26-108 Brouwer, 1999, A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies, Regional Environmental Change, 1, 47, 10.1007/s101130050007 Christensen, J.B., 1988. An economic approach to assessing the value of recreation with special reference to forest areas. Ph.D. Thesis, Frederiksberg, Denmark: Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University [Valuation results from (a) Denmark and (b) Wales], pp. 123–178. David, M.H., 1992. Benefiting benefits transfer: information systems for complex scientific data. EPA 230-R-93-018. Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE). Elsasser, 1996 Everett, 1979, The monetary value of the recreational benefits of wildlife, Journal of Environmental Management, 8, 203 Gatto, 1988, La valutazione economica del paesaggio forestale e del verde urbano. Metode e Applicazioni, Monti e Boschi, 39, 28 Glück, 1977, Der Erholungswert des Großen Ahornbodens, AFZTG, 88, 7 Hanley, 1989, Valuing rural recreation benefits: an empirical comparison of two approaches, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, 361, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1989.tb01117.x Hanley, 1993, The valuation of forest characteristics, 171 Hanley, N., Willis, K.G., Powe, N., Anderson, M., 2002. Valuing the Benefits of Biodiversity in Forests, Forestry Commission. Huber, P.J., 1967. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, vol. 1, pp. 221–223. INRA. 1979. La Foret et la ville. Essai sur la foret dans l’environnement urbain et industriel. 1-120. Olivet, France, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station de Recherches sur la foret et l’environnement. Jensen, F.S., Koch, N.E., 1997. Friluftsliv i Skovene 1976/77–1993/94 [Recreation in Forests 1976/77–1993/94]. Forskningsserien nr. 20. Hørsholm: Forskningscentret for Skov & Landskab. Johnston, 2005, Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, 221, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.04018.x Kooten, 2004, How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks, Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 239, 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.006 Lindhjem, 2007, 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: a meta-analysis, Journal of Forest Economics, 12, 251, 10.1016/j.jfe.2006.09.003 Loomis, 1992, The evolution of a more rigourous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer, Water Resources Research, 28, 701, 10.1029/91WR02596 Loomis, 1996, Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 15, 197, 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8 Löwenstein, 1991, Die Monetäre bewertung der Fernerholung im Südharz mit der Reisekostenmethode, 162 Luttmann, 1995 Mann, 1994, Can meta-analysis make policy?, Science, 266, 960, 10.1126/science.7973676 Marangon, F., Gottardo, E., 2001. La valutazione monetaria del danno ai boschi del Friuli-Venezia Giulia. In: La valutazione dei beni ambientali come supporto alle decisioni pubbliche, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy, pp. 1–27. Marinelli, 1987, La Foresta Umbra: Criteri di scelta nell’impiego di una risorsa naturale ad uso multiplo, Rassegna Economica, 51, 515 Marinelli, 1990, Valutazione economica dell’impatto aggregato e dei benefici diretti della ricreazione all’aperto di un parco naturale della Toscana, Genio Rurale, 9, 51 Merlo, 1986, Valutazione dei servizi ricreativo-ambientali dei boschi, Economia Montana, 4, 3 Merlo, 1991, Alternative estimates of outdoor recreation benefits in Italy, 133 Moons, E., Loomis, J.B., Proost, S., Eggermont, K., Hermy, M., 2001. Travel cost and time measurement in travel cost models. Working Paper Series no 2001-22, 1–19. Faculty of Economics and Applied Economic Sciences, Katolieke Universiteit Leuven. Moulton, 1986, Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates, Journal of Econometrics, 32, 385, 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90021-7 Ovaskainen, 2001, Estimating recreation demand with on-site data: an application of truncated and endogenously stratified count data models, Journal of Forest Economics, 7, 125 Oyarzun, D.A., 1994. Aplicacion del metodo del coste del viaje a la valoracion de “La Pedriza”, en el Parque Regional de la Cuenca Alta del Manzanares en la provincia de Madrid. In: Valoracion economica de la calidad ambiental. McGrawHill, Madrid. Pearson, 1904, Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics, British Medical Journal, 3, 1243 Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005. Meta analysis of forest valuation studies. Working paper (in Finnish). Rosenberger, R.S., Loomis, J.B., 2001. Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values. A technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 Revision). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. Rosenberger, 2002 Scarpa, 2000, Importance of forest attributes in the willingness to pay for recreation: a contingent valuation study of Irish forests, Forest Policy and Economics, 1, 315, 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00026-5 Shannon, 1949 Shrestha, 2003, Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: testing out-of-sample convergent validity, Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 79, 10.1023/A:1023658501572 Smith, 1990, Estimating recreation demand using the properties of the implied consumer surplus, Land Economics, 66, 111, 10.2307/3146360 Smith, 1995, Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models, Journal of Political Economy, 130, 209, 10.1086/261981 Smith, 1990, What have we learned since Hotelling's letter? A meta-analysis, Economics Letters, 32, 267, 10.1016/0165-1765(90)90110-M Smith, 1990, Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 419, 10.2307/1242344 Smith, 1996, Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ‘‘Scope’’ test? A meta-analysis, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 287, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0045 Stanley, 2001, Wheat from chaff meta-analysis as quantitative literature review, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 131, 10.1257/jep.15.3.131 Stoker, 1993, Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals, Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1827 Sturtevant, 1995 Termansen, 2004, Recreational site choice modelling using high resolution spatial data, Environment and Planning A, 36, 1085, 10.1068/a36164 Van den Bergh, 1997 Walsh, 1992, Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988, Water Resources Research, 28, 707, 10.1029/91WR02597 White, 1980, A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48, 817, 10.2307/1912934 Willis, 1991, The recreational value of the forestry commission estate in Great Britain: a Clawson–Knetsch travel cost analysis, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 38, 58, 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1991.tb00301.x Willis, 1988, A comparison of user benefits and costs of nature conservation at three nature reserves, Regional Studies, 22, 417, 10.1080/00343408812331345090 Willis, 1989, Recreational values of forests, Forestry, 62, 93, 10.1093/forestry/62.2.93-a Willis, 1991, An individual travel-cost method of evaluating forest recreation, Journal of Arboriculture, 42, 33 Woodward, 2001, The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 37, 257, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7 Zandersen, 2007, Testing benefits transfer of forest recreation values over a 20-year time horizon, Land Economics, 83, 10.3368/le.83.3.412