Six views of embodied cognition

Agre, P. E. (1993). The symbolic worldview: Reply to Vera and Simon.Cognitive Science,17, 61–69. Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Baddeley, A., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 647–667). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Ballard, D. H. (1996). On the function of visual representation. In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (pp. 111–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., &Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 723–767. Barsalou, L. W. (1999a). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action?Discourse Processes,28, 61–80. Barsalou, L. W. (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660. Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent- environment interaction.Artificial Intelligence,72, 173–215. Beer, R. D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 91–99. Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot.Journal of Robotics & Automation,2, 14–23. Brooks, R. (1991a). Intelligence without representation.Artificial Intelligence Journal,47, 139–160. Brooks, R. (1991b). New approaches to robotics.Science,253, 1227–1232. Brooks, R. (1999). Cambrian intelligence:The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chiel, H., &Beer, R. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body, and environment.Trends in Neurosciences,20, 553–557. Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S., &Sjenowski, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.),Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 23–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (1997).Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (1998). Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science (pp. 506–517). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Clark, A., &Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics.Adaptive Behavior,7, 5–16. Cohen, N. J., Eichenbaum, H., Deacedo, B. S., &Corkin, S. (1985). Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. In D. S. Olton, E. Gamzu, & S. Corkin (Eds.),Memory dysfunctions: An integration of animal and human research from preclinical and clinical perspectives (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 444, pp. 54–71). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C. A., &Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect.NeuroReport,8, 347–349. Dennett, D. (1995).Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster. de Waal, F. B. M. (2001).The ape and the sushi master: Cultural reflections by a primatologist. New York: Basic Books. Epelboim, J. (1997). Deictic codes, embodiment of cognition, and the real world.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 746. Farah, M. J. (1995). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 963–975). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Franklin, S. (1995).Artificial minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gibbs, R. W., Bogdanovich, J. M., Sykes, J. R., &Barr, D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 141–154. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–55. Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions.Discourse Processes,28, 1–26. Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 379–401. Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences,15, 20–25. Goodwin, C. J. (1999).A history of modern psychology. New York: Wiley. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., &Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools.NeuroImage,6, 231–236. Greeno, J. G., &Moore, J. L. (1993). Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon.Cognitive Science,17, 49–59. Grush, R. (1996).Emulation and cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Grush, R. (1997). Yet another design for a brain? Review of Port and van Gelder (Eds.),Mind as motion. Philosophical Psychology,10, 233–242. Grush, R. (1998).Perception, imagery, and the sensorimotor loop. www.pitt.edu/~grush/papers/%21papers.html. English translation of: Wahrnehmung, Vorstellung und die sensomotorische Schleife. In F. Esken & H.-D. Heckmann (Eds.),Bewuβtsein und Repräsentation. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh. Hutchins, E. (1995).Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Iverson, J. M., &Goldin-Meadow, S. (1998). Why people gesture when they speak.Nature,396, 228. Jeannerod, M. (1997).The cognitive neuroscience of action. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Johnston, W. A., Dark, V. J., &Jacoby, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 3–11. Juarrero, A. (1999).Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kaschak, M. P., &Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 508–529. Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kirsh, D., &Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action.Cognitive Science,18, 513–549. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994).Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Felician, O., &Camposano, S. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.Science,284, 167–170. Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak?Current Directions in Psychological Science,7, 54–60. Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1999).Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. Langacker, R. (1987, 1991).Foundations of cognitive grammar (2 vols.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Leakey, R. (1994).The origin of humankind. New York: Basic Books. Markman, A. B., &Dietrich, E. (2000). In defense of representation.Cognitive Psychology,40, 138–171. Mataric, M. (1991). Navigating with a rat brain: A neurobiologically inspired model for robot spatial representation. In J.-A. Meyer & S. Wilson (Eds.),From animals to animats (pp.169–175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raos, V., &Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,78, 2226–2230. Ohlsson, S. (1999). Anchoring language in reality: Observations on reference and representation.Discourse Processes,28, 93–105. O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 461–488. Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., Martin, C. C., Jerabek, P. A., &Lancaster, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET.Nature,375, 54–58. Pessoa, L., Thompson, E., &Noë, A. (1998). Finding out about fillingin: A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 723–802. Pfeifer, R., &Scheier, C. (1999).Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Port, R. F., &van Gelder, T. (1995).Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Putnam, H. (1970). Is semantics possible? In H. E. Kiefer & M. K. Munitz (Eds.),Language, belief and metaphysics (pp.50–63). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Quinn, R., &Espenschied, K. (1993). Control of a hexapod robot using a biologically inspired neural network. In R. Beer, R. Ritzman, & T. McKenna (Eds.),Biological neural networks in invertebrate neuroethology and robotics (pp. 365–381). San Diego: Academic Press. Reisberg, D. (Ed.) (1992). Auditory imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Rips, L. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Saito, F., &Fukuda, T. (1994). Two link robot brachiation with connectionist Q-learning. In D. Cliff (Ed.),From animals to animats 3 (pp.309–314). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66. Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190. Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267. Slater, C. (1997). Conceptualizing a sunset ≠ using a sunset as a discriminative stimulus.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 37–38. Steels, L., &Brooks, R. (1995).The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Stein, L. (1994). Imagination and situated cognition.Journal of Experimental Theoretical Artificial Intelligence,6, 393–407. Talmy, L. (2000).Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. I. Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Thelen, E., &Smith, L. B. (1994).A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Tomasello, M. (1998). Cognitive linguistics. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science (pp. 477–487). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Tucker, M., &Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 830–846. Uexküll, J. von (1934). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.),Instinctive behavior: The development of modern concept (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press. Uleman, J., &Bargh, J. (Eds.) (1989).Unintended thought. New York: Guilford. van Gelder, T., &Port, R. (1995). It’s about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.),Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition(pp. 1–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Vera, A. H., &Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation.Cognitive Science,17, 7–48. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mediated action. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science (pp. 518–525). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Wiles, J., &Dartnall, T. (1999).Perspectives on cognitive science: Theories, experiments, and foundations. Stamford, CT: Ablex. Wilson, M. (2001a). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 44–57. Wilson, M. (2001b). Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output.Psychological Bulletin,127, 543–553. Wilson, M., &Emmorey, K. (1997). A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language.Memory & Cognition,25, 313–320. Wilson, M., &Emmorey, K. (1998). A “word length effect” for sign language: Further evidence for the role of language in structuring working memory.Memory & Cognition,26, 584–590. Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models.Discourse Processes,28, 81–88.