Relations between nests ofmessor wasmanni in Greece
Tóm tắt
Foraging behaviour ofMessor wasmanni, a seed collecting ant, foraging along trails up to 15m long in open flat ground in Greece, is described. These ants foraged in daytime on about one day in three, the nest entrance being otherwise closed with discarded remains of the plant material. They started approximately at dawn and material. They started approximately at dawn and continued until the ground surface temperature reached 40–43°C. Of the order of 20–30,000 individual foraging expeditions were made from the nest per day involving about 5,000 individual ants. They dispersed from the end of the trail and searched individually in limited areas of a few square feet (say half m2). Nests at a density of about 70 to the hectare were spaced in a pattern which was not random. Trails go out radially from each nest, usually a single trail in any day. Foraging areas for different nests overlapped but the chance of trails intersecting was low. An intersection was seen only once in approximately 500 trails from about a dozen nests examined in detail. The two trails met at right angles and the shorter one broke up at the junction, the ants from it going on across the other trail in the same general direction but more dispersed than before. All nests tended to forage after rain but the net synchronizing effect of this tendency was small, the nests in general foraging independently of one another in time. Calculation of the probability of trail intersection, allowing for the chance of adjacent nests having trails on the same day, and assuming a random trail direction together with the observed distribution of trail length gave a low value (7) for the expected number of intersections. No evidence of aggressive behaviour between different nests was found. Individuals, marked with paint and transferred artificially to a new nest, survived and foraged among those of their new nest. On three ocasions small subsidiary nests were found from which ants went to and fro along a trail to the main nest and on one occasion eggs and larval stages were transferred. On many occasions groups of ants dug small holes in the ground adjacent to a trail, which are most easily explained as incipient subsidiary nests.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bernstein R.A., 1975. — Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density.Ecology, 56, 213–219.
Box T.W., 1960. — Notes on the harvester ant,Pogonomyrmex barbatus var. molefaciens, in South Texas.Ecology, 41, 281–382.
Davidson D.W., 1977. — Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants.Ecology, 58, 711–724.
De Vita J., 1979. — Mechanisms of interference and foraging among colonies of the harvester andPogonomyrmex californicus in the Mojave desert.Ecology, 60, 729–737.
Dobdzanska J., 1966. — The control of territory byLasius fulginosus Latr.Acta biol. Exper., 26, 193–213.
Dolflein F., 1920. —Macedonische Ameisen, Jena.
Fowler H.G., 1978. — Foraging trails of leaf-cutting ants.Proc. New York Entomol. Soc., 86, 132–136.
Goetsch W., 1928. — Beitrage zur Biologie körnersammelnder Ameisen.Z. Morph. u. Okol. Tiere, 10, 358–419.
Goetsch W., Eisner H., 1929. — Beitrage zur Biologie körnersammelnder Ameisen II Teil.Z. Morph. u. Okol. Tiere, 16, 371–452.
Harkness R.D., 1975. — The relation between an ant,Cataglyphis bicolor (F.) (Hym., Formicidae) and a spiderZodarium frenatum (Simon) (Araneae, Zodariidae).Entomologists mon. Mag., 111, 141–146.
Harkness R.D., Isham V., 1983. — A bivariate spatial point pattern of ants nests.Appl. Statist., 32, 293–303.
Harkness R.D., Maroudas N.G., 1985. — Central place foraging by an ant (Cataglyphis bicolor Fab.): A model of searching.Anim. Behav., 33, 916–928.
Harrison J.S., Gentry J.B., 1981. — Foraging pattern, colony distribution and foraging range of the Florida harvester ant,Pogonomyrmex badius.Ecology, 62, 1467–1472.
Hölldobler B., 1976. — Recruitment behaviour, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants,Pogonomyrmex.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1, 3–44.
Levieux J., 1979. — The nutrition of granivorous ants 4. Cycle of activity and diet ofMessor galla andMessor regalis in the rainy season.Insectes Soc., 26, 279–294.
Levieux J., Diomande T., 1978. — The nutrition of granivorous ants II. The cycle of activity and diet ofBrachyponera senaarensis (Mayr.) (Hym. Formicidae).Insectes Soc., 25, 187–196.
Levings S.C., Traniello J.F.A., 1981. — Territoriality, nest dispersion and community structure in ants.Psyche, 88, 265–319.
Levings S.C., Franks N.R., 1982. — Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical ground ant community.Ecology, 63, 338–344.
McCook H.C., 1879. —The natural history of the agricultural ant of Texas.Philadelphia: Acad. Nat. Sci.
Moggridge J.T., 1873. —Harvesting ants and trap-door spiders. Ashoford Kent: Reeve.
Mordecai J.B., Kugler J., 1976. — Ecology of ants in the desert loess plain (Sede Zin) of Sede Boqer (Central Negev).Isr. J. Zool., 25, 216–217.
Onoyama K., Abe T., 1982. — Foraging behaviour of the harvester andMessor aciculatus in relation to the amount and distribution of food.Japan. J. Ecol., 32, 383–394.
Rissing S.W., 1981. — Prey preferences in the desert horned lizard: influence of prey foraging method and aggressive behaviour.Ecology, 62, 1031–1040.
Rissing S.W., Wheeler J., 1976. — Foraging responses ofVeromessor pergandei to changes in seed production.Pan-Pacific Entomol., 52, 63–72.
Ryti R.T., Case T.J., 1984. — Spatial arrangement and diet overlap between colonies of desert ants.Oecologia (Berlin),62, 401–404.
Ryti R.T., Case T.J., 1986. — Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses.Oecologia (Berlin),69, 446–453.
Shehata M.N., Kaschef A.H., 1971. — Foraging activities ofMesor aegyptiacius Emery (Hym. Formicidae).Insectes Soc., 18, 215–226.
Shehata M.N., 1977. — Notes on the foraging activities and behaviour of the antsMessor semirufus andCataglyphis bicolor nigra in the Yemen 1.Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte, 61, 1–14.
Tohme G., Tohme H., 1978. — Croissance de la société et longévité de la reine et des ouvrières chezMessor semirufus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Compt. Rend. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. Ser. D. Sci. Nat., 286, 961–963.
Wehner R., Harkness R.D., Schmidt-Hempel P., 1983. — Foraging strategies in individually searching ants,Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Acad. Wiss. Litt., Mainz, Math-Nat. Wiss. Kl., In “Information Processing in Animals” Vol. 1, 1–79. Ed. M. Lindauer, Stuttgart: G. Fisher.
Wheeler J., Rissing J.T., 1973. — Natural history ofVeromessor pergandei. I The nest.Pan-Pacific Entomol., 51, 205–216.
Wheeler J., Rissing S.W., 1975. — Natural history ofVeromessor pergandei. II Behaviour.Pan-Pacfic Entomol., 51, 303–314.
Whitford W.G., 1976. — Foraging behaviour of Chihuahuan desert harvester ants.Amer. Midland. Nat., 95, 455–458.
Whitford W.G., Ettershank G., 1975. — Factors affecting foraging activity in Chihuahuan desert ants.Environ. Entomol., 4, 689–696.
Whitford W.G., Johnson P., Ramirez J., 1976. — Comparative ecology of the harvester antsPogonomyrmex barbatus (F. Smith) andPogonomyrmex rugosus (Emery).Insectes Soc.,23, 117–132.