DNA methylation and the preservation of cell identity

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development - Tập 46 - Trang 9-14 - 2017
Ozren Bogdanović1,2,3, Ryan Lister1,4
1Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
2Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
3St Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
4Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Perino, 2016, Chromatin control of developmental dynamics and plasticity, Dev Cell, 38, 610, 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.004 Bird, 1986, CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation, Nature, 321, 209, 10.1038/321209a0 Bird, 2002, DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory, Genes Dev, 16, 6, 10.1101/gad.947102 Schubeler, 2015, Function and information content of DNA methylation, Nature, 517, 321, 10.1038/nature14192 Jurkowska, 2011, Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases, Chembiochem, 12, 206, 10.1002/cbic.201000195 Bhutani, 2011, DNA demethylation dynamics, Cell, 146, 866, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.042 Nan, 1998, Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex, Nature, 393, 386, 10.1038/30764 Jones, 1998, Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription, Nat Genet, 19, 187, 10.1038/561 Bogdanovic, 2009, DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins: developmental requirements and function, Chromosoma, 118, 549, 10.1007/s00412-009-0221-9 Du, 2015, Methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins: readers of the epigenome, Epigenomics, 7, 1051, 10.2217/epi.15.39 Iguchi-Ariga, 1989, CpG methylation of the cAMP-responsive enhancer/promoter sequence TGACGTCA abolishes specific factor binding as well as transcriptional activation, Genes Dev, 3, 612, 10.1101/gad.3.5.612 Campanero, 2000, CpG methylation as a mechanism for the regulation of E2F activity, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97, 6481, 10.1073/pnas.100340697 Domcke, 2015, Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1, Nature, 528, 575, 10.1038/nature16462 Bogdanovic, 2011, Temporal uncoupling of the DNA methylome and transcriptional repression during embryogenesis, Genome Res, 21, 1313, 10.1101/gr.114843.110 Spruijt, 2013, Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives, Cell, 152, 1146, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.004 Iurlaro, 2013, A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation, Genome Biol, 14, R119, 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r119 Lister, 2009, Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences, Nature, 462, 315, 10.1038/nature08514 Xie, 2013, Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells, Cell, 153, 1134, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.022 Smith, 2012, A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo, Nature, 484, 339, 10.1038/nature10960 Potok, 2013, Reprogramming the maternal zebrafish genome after fertilization to match the paternal methylation pattern, Cell, 153, 759, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.030 Jiang, 2013, Sperm, but not oocyte, DNA methylome is inherited by zebrafish early embryos, Cell, 153, 773, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.041 Guo, 2014, The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos, Nature, 511, 606, 10.1038/nature13544 Smith, 2014, DNA methylation dynamics of the human preimplantation embryo, Nature, 511, 611, 10.1038/nature13581 Messerschmidt, 2014, DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation embryos, Genes Dev, 28, 812, 10.1101/gad.234294.113 Amouroux, 2016, De novo DNA methylation drives 5hmC accumulation in mouse zygotes, Nat Cell Biol, 18, 225, 10.1038/ncb3296 Leitch, 2013, Naive pluripotency is associated with global DNA hypomethylation, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 20, 311, 10.1038/nsmb.2510 Habibi, 2013, Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 13, 360, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.002 Ficz, 2013, FGF signaling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency, Cell Stem Cell, 13, 351, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.004 Takahashi, 2006, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors, Cell, 126, 663, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 Milagre, 2017, Gender differences in global but not targeted demethylation in iPSC reprogramming, Cell Rep, 18, 1079, 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.008 Lister, 2011, Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature, 471, 68, 10.1038/nature09798 Polo, 2010, Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells, Nat Biotechnol, 28, 848, 10.1038/nbt.1667 Ruiz, 2012, Identification of a specific reprogramming-associated epigenetic signature in human induced pluripotent stem cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 16196, 10.1073/pnas.1202352109 Ma, 2014, Abnormalities in human pluripotent cells due to reprogramming mechanisms, Nature, 511, 177, 10.1038/nature13551 Grow, 2015, Intrinsic retroviral reactivation in human preimplantation embryos and pluripotent cells, Nature, 522, 221, 10.1038/nature14308 Wardle, 2004, Refinement of gene expression patterns in the early Xenopus embryo, Development, 131, 4687, 10.1242/dev.01340 Paranjpe, 2015, Establishing pluripotency in early development, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1849, 626, 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.03.006 Eckersley-Maslin, 2016, MERVL/Zscan4 network activation results in transient genome-wide DNA demethylation of mESCs, Cell Rep, 17, 179, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.087 Macfarlan, 2012, Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity, Nature, 487, 57, 10.1038/nature11244 Dawlaty, 2013, Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development, Dev Cell, 24, 310, 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.015 Bogdanovic, 2016, Active DNA demethylation at enhancers during the vertebrate phylotypic period, Nat Genet, 48, 417, 10.1038/ng.3522 Dai, 2016, TET-mediated DNA demethylation controls gastrulation by regulating Lefty-Nodal signalling, Nature, 538, 528, 10.1038/nature20095 Li, 2016, Tet proteins influence the balance between neuroectodermal and mesodermal fate choice by inhibiting Wnt signaling, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113, E8267, 10.1073/pnas.1617802113 Lee, 2014, Reprogramming the methylome: erasing memory and creating diversity, Cell Stem Cell, 14, 710, 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.008 Seisenberger, 2012, The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells, Mol Cell, 48, 849, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001 Hargan-Calvopina, 2016, Stage-specific demethylation in primordial germ cells safeguards against precocious differentiation, Dev Cell, 39, 75, 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.07.019 Bestor, 2015, Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112, 6796, 10.1073/pnas.1415301111 Stadler, 2011, DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions, Nature, 480, 490, 10.1038/nature10716 Thurman, 2012, The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome, Nature, 489, 75, 10.1038/nature11232 Sakaue, 2010, DNA methylation is dispensable for the growth and survival of the extraembryonic lineages, Curr Biol, 20, 1452, 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.050 Hontelez, 2015, Embryonic transcription is controlled by maternally defined chromatin state, Nat Commun, 6, 10148, 10.1038/ncomms10148