Cruciferous Vegetables: Cancer Protective Mechanisms of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products and Selenium

Integrative Cancer Therapies - Tập 3 Số 1 - Trang 5-12 - 2004
Anna-Sigrid Keck1, John W. Finley2
1United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202-9034 USA
2United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota

Tóm tắt

Dietetic professionals urge Americans to increase fruit and vegetable intakes. The American Institute of Cancer Research estimates that if the only dietary change made was to increase the daily intake of fruits and vegetables to 5 servings per day, cancer rates could decline by as much as 20%. Among the reasons cited for this health benefit are that fruits and vegetables are excellent sources of fiber, vitamins, and minerals. They also contain nonnutritive components that may provide substantial health benefits beyond basic nutrition. Examples of the latter are the glucosinolate hydrolysis products, sulforaphane, and indole-3-carbinol. Epidemiological studies provide evidence that the consumption of cruciferous vegetables protects against cancer more effectively than the total intake of fruits and vegetables. This review describes the anticarcinogenic bioactivities of glucosinolate hydrolysis products, the mineral selenium derived from crucifers, and the mechanisms by which they protect against cancer. These mechanisms include altered estrogen metabolism, protection against reactive oxygen species, altered detoxification by induction of phase II enzymes, decreased carcinogen activation by inhibition of phase I enzymes, and slowed tumor growth and induction of apoptosis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. American Cancer Society. Statistics: Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2002.

10.1093/jn/131.11.3078S

3. Verhoeven DT, Goldbohm RA, van Poppel G, et al. Epidemiological studies on Brassica vegetables and cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996; 5: 733-748.

10.1093/carcin/20.12.2267

5. Wattenberg LW, Sachafer HW, Water LJ, et al. Inhibition of mammary tumor formation by broccoli and cabbage. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1989; 30: 181-188.

10.1093/jnci/91.7.605

10.1093/jnci/92.1.61

8. National Research Council. Diet, Nutrition and Cancer. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1982.

10.1080/10408398209527361

10.1093/carcin/17.11.2385

10.1093/jn/130.9.2384

12. Jeffery EH, Jarrell V. Cruciferous vegetables and cancer prevention. In: Wildman REC, ed. Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001: 169-191.

13. United States Department of Agriculture. Per Capita Consumption. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture/Economic Research Service; 2002.

10.1021/jf980985s

10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82893-9

16. Brown AF, Yousef GG, Jeffery EH, et al. Glucosinolate profiles in broccoli (Brassica oleracea): stability over environments and implications for cancer chemoprotection [abstract]. Hort Sci. 2001; 36: 453.

10.1079/BJN19930127

10.1021/jf0013860

10.1073/pnas.89.6.2399

10.1093/carcin/15.5.1073

21. Zhang Y, Talalay P. Mechanism of differential potencies of isothiocyanates as inducers of anticarcinogenic phase 2 enzymes. Cancer Res. 1998; 58: 4632-4639.

10.1093/jn/129.3.768S

10.3181/00379727-216-44174

10.1093/carcin/22.6.943

10.1006/taap.1998.8543

10.1093/carcin/21.11.1983

27. Maheo K, Morel F, Langouet S, et al. Inhibition of cytochromes P-450 and induction of glutathione s-transferases by sulforaphane in primary human and rat hepatocytes. Cancer Res. 1997; 57: 3649-3652.

10.1093/carcin/21.12.2287

10.1073/pnas.94.19.10367

10.1016/S0955-2863(02)00282-6

10.1093/carcin/13.12.2205

10.1093/carcin/18.9.1729

10.1016/0278-6915(90)90014-E

34. Bonnesen C, Eggleston IM, Hayes JD. Dietary indoles and isothiocyanates that are generated from cruciferous vegetables can both stimulate apoptosis and confer protection against DNA damage in human colon cell lines. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 6120-6130.

10.1093/jnci/89.10.718

10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00188-9

10.1093/carcin/17.4.793

10.3109/10715769609145657

10.1038/sj.onc.1204365

40. Gamet-Payrastre L, Li P, Lumeau S, et al. Sulforaphane, a naturally occurring isothiocyanate, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in Ht29 human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 1426-1433.

10.1080/01635581.2001.9680630

10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(1997)28/29+<111::AID-JCB12>3.0.CO;2-K

10.1006/gyno.2000.5847

10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70274-8

10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00156-7

10.1021/jf010809a

10.1207/S15327914NC422_13

48. Duffield AJ, Reid ME, Turnbull BW, et al. Baseline characteristics and the effect of selenium supplementation on cancer incidence in a randomized clinical trial: a summary report of the nutritional prevention of cancer trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 630-639.

49. Ip C, Birringer M, Block E, et al. Chemical speciation influences comparative activity of selenium-enriched garlic and yeast in mammary cancer prevention. J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48: 4452.

10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00014-X

10.1089/152308602753666398

10.2134/jeq2002.1802

10.1093/jn/132.2.307

10.1006/eesa.1996.1517

10.1021/jf00055a002

10.1021/jf0258555

10.1039/a906320j

10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00030-X

10.1054/mehy.1998.0751

10.1093/jn/130.12.2903

10.1021/jf0014821

10.1021/jf980027q

10.1002/biof.5520140124

10.1023/A:1021263027659

65. Ip C, Ganther HE. Relationship between chemical form of selenium and anticarcinogenic activity. In: Wattenberg L, Lipkin M, eds. Cancer Chemoprevention. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1992: 497-488.

10.1093/jn/133.9.2721

10.1104/pp.010686

10.1080/15226510208500090

10.1016/0304-3835(89)90034-7

10.1351/pac199668040937

71. Finley JW, Matthys L, Shuler T, et al. Selenium content of foods purchased in North Dakota. Proc Soc Exp Bio Med. 1996; 210: 270-277.

10.1080/01635589209514197

10.1093/carcin/17.9.1903