The calibration of CES production functions
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acemoglu, 2003, Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 1, 10.1162/154247603322256756
Aiyar, 2009, Accounting for productivity: is it OK to assume that the world is Cobb-Douglas?, Journal of Macroeconomics, 31, 290, 10.1016/j.jmacro.2008.09.007
Antony, 2008, Comment on James Smith: that elusive elasticity and the ubiquitous bias: Is panel data a panacea?, Journal of Macroeconomics, 30, 780, 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.09.005
Antony, 2010, A class of changing elasticity of substitution production functions, Journal of Economics, 100, 165, 10.1007/s00712-010-0118-3
Antràs, 2004, Is the US aggregate production function Cobb-Douglas? New estimates of the elasticity of substitution, Contributions to Macroeconomics, 4
Arrow, 1961, Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency, Review of Economics and Statistics, 43, 225, 10.2307/1927286
Atkinson, 1969, A new view of technological change, Economic Journal, 79, 573, 10.2307/2230384
Backus, 2008, Taxes and the global allocation of capital, Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 48, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.11.008
Bentolila, 2006, Explaining movements in the labor share, Contributions to Macroeconomics, 3
Blanchard, 1997, The medium run, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 89, 10.2307/2534687
Cantore, Cristiano, León-Ledesma, Miguel, McAdam, Peter, Willman, Alpo, 2010. Shocking stuff: technology, hours, and factor substitution. ECB Working Paper Series No. 1278.
Cantore, Cristiano, Levine, Paul, 2011. Getting normalization right: dealing with ‘dimensional constants’ in macroeconomics. University of Surrey Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 05/11.
Caselli, 2005, Accounting for cross-country income differences, 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01009-9
Caselli, 2006, The world technology frontier, American Economic Review, 96, 499, 10.1257/aer.96.3.499
Chirinko, 2008, σ: the long and short of it, Journal of Macroeconomics, 30, 671, 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.10.010
Duffy, 2000, The specification of the aggregate production function: a cross-country empirical investigation, Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 83, 10.1023/A:1009830421147
Growiec, 2008, Production functions and distributions of unit factor productivities: uncovering the link, Economics Letters, 101, 87, 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.06.009
Growiec, Jakub, 2011. A microfoundation for normalized CES production functions with factor-augmenting technical change. National Bank of Poland Working Paper No. 98.
Irmen, 2011, Steady-state growth and the elasticity of substitution, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1215, 10.1016/j.jedc.2011.04.002
Jones, 2005, The shape of production functions and the direction of technical change, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 517
Jones, 1965, The structure of simple general equilibrium models, Journal of Political Economy, 63, 472
Jones, 2008, The aggregate elasticity of factor substitution with middle products, Journal of Macroeconomics, 30, 633, 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.06.004
Kamien, 1968, Optimal ‘induced’ technical change, Econometrica, 36, 1, 10.2307/1909600
Klump, 2000, Economic growth and the elasticity of substitution: two theorems and some suggestions, American Economic Review, 90, 282, 10.1257/aer.90.1.282
Klump, 2007, Factor substitution and factor-augmenting technical progress in the United States: a normalized supply-side system approach, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 183, 10.1162/rest.89.1.183
Klump, 2008, The long-term sucCESs of the neoclassical growth model, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23, 94, 10.1093/oxrep/grm003
Klump, Rainer, McAdam, Peter, Willman, Alpo, 2011. The normalized CES production function: theory and empirics. ECB Working Paper No. 1294, February.
Klump, 2000, CES production functions and economic growth, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102, 41, 10.1111/1467-9442.00183
Klump, 2008, Calibration of normalised CES production functions in dynamic models, Economics Letters, 98, 256, 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.07.001
Kortum, 1997, Research, patenting, and technological change, Econometrica, 65, 1389, 10.2307/2171741
La Grandville, 1989, In quest of the Slutsky diamond, American Economic Review, 79, 468
La Grandville, 2009
Laitner, 1995, Quantitative evaluations of efficient tax policies for Lucas’ supply side models, Oxford Economic Papers, 47, 471, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042182
León-Ledesma, 2010, Identifying the elasticity of substitution with biased technical change, American Economic Review, 100, 1330, 10.1257/aer.100.4.1330
León-Ledesma, Miguel A., McAdam, Peter, Willman, Alpo, 2010b. In dubio pro CES: supply estimation with mis-specified technical change. ECB Working Paper No. 1175, April.
Lucas, 1990, Supply-side economics: an analytical review, Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 293, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041948
Mallick, Debdulal, 2008. The role of the elasticity of substitution in economic growth: a cross-country test of the de La Grandville hypothesis. Manuscript, Deakin University, August.
Miyagiwa, 2008, Comment on ‘The endogenous aggregate elasticity of substitution for a small open economy’, Journal of Macroeconomics, 30, 641, 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.09.007
Miyagiwa, 2007, Endogenous aggregate elasticity of substitution, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 38, 2899, 10.1016/j.jedc.2006.06.009
Nakumura, 2009, Micro-foundation for a constant elasticity of substitution production function through mechanization, Journal of Macroeconomics, 31, 464, 10.1016/j.jmacro.2008.09.006
Papageorgiou, 2008, Two-level CES production technology in the Solow and Diamond growth models, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110, 119, 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00529.x
Rutherford, Thomas F., 1995. Constant elasticity of substitution functions: some hints and useful formulae. Manuscript, University of Colorado.
Turnovsky, 2002, Intertemporal and intratemporal substitution, and the speed of convergence in the neoclassical growth model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26, 1765, 10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00094-X
Wong, 2010, Indeterminacy and the elasticity of substitution in one-sector models, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34, 623, 10.1016/j.jedc.2009.10.011