The interaction between predation and competition

Nature - Tập 456 Số 7219 - Trang 235-238 - 2008
Peter Chesson1, Jessica J. Kuang1
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Chase, J. M. et al. The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 5, 302–315 (2002)

Holt, R. D. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am. Nat. 124, 377–406 (1984)

Kotler, B. P. & Holt, R. D. Predation and competition: the interaction of two types of species interactions. Oikos 54, 256–260 (1989)

Grover, J. P. & Holt, R. D. Disentangling resource and apparent competition: realistic models for plant-herbivore communities. J. Theor. Biol. 191, 353–376 (1998)

Krivan, V. Competitive co-existence by adaptive predators. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 1163–1182 (2003)

MacArthur, R. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1, 1–11 (1970)

Chesson, P. MacArthur’s consumer–resource model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 37, 26–38 (1990)

Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000)

Chesson, P. & Huntly, N. The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am. Nat. 150, 519–553 (1997)

Holt, R. D., Grover, J. & Tilman, D. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am. Nat. 144, 741–771 (1994)

Abrams, P. A. High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: exploitative and apparent competition in consumer-resource systems. Am. Nat. 152, 114–128 (1998)

Chesson, P. in Unity in Diversity: Reflections on Ecology after the Legacy of Ramon Margalef (eds Valladares, F. et al.) 119–164 (Fundacion BBVA, 2008)

Holt, R. D. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 12, 197–229 (1977)

Haygood, R. Coexistence in MacArthur-style consumer–resource models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61, 215–223 (2002)

Kuang, J. J. & Chesson, P. Predation–competition interactions for seasonally recruiting species. Am. Nat. 171, E119–E133 (2008)

Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959)

Kuang, J. J. & Chesson, P. Coexistence of annual plants: generalist seed predation weakens the storage effect. Ecology (in the press)

Soule, M. E. & Terborgh, J. Conserving nature at regional and continental scales—a scientific program for North America. Bioscience 49, 809–817 (1999)

Sala, E. Top predators provide insurance against climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 479–480 (2006)

Schmitz, O. J. Predators have large effects on ecosystem properties by changing plant diversity, not plant biomass. Ecology 87, 1432–1437 (2006)

Johnson, C. N., Isaac, J. L. & Fisher, D. O. Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 341–346 (2007)

Borrvall, C. & Ebenman, B. Early onset of secondary extinctions in ecological communities following the loss of top predators. Ecol. Lett. 9, 435–442 (2006)

Myers, R. A., Baum, J. K., Shepherd, T. D., Powers, S. P. & Peterson, C. H. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315, 1846–1850 (2007)

Heithaus, M. R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A. J. & Worm, B. Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 202–210 (2008)