Contested multilateralism
Tóm tắt
“Contested multilateralism” describes the situation that results from the pursuit of strategies by states, multilateral organizations, and non-state actors to use multilateral institutions, existing or newly created, to challenge the rules, practices, or missions of existing multilateral institutions. It occurs when coalitions dissatisfied with existing institutions combine threats of exit, voice, and the creation of alternative institutions to pursue policies and practices different from those of existing institutions. Contested multilateralism takes two principal forms: regime shifting and competitive regime creation. It can be observed across issue areas. It shapes patterns of international cooperation and discord on key security concerns such as combating terrorist financing, halting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and banning certain conventional weapons. It is also evident on economic issues involving intellectual property, on environmental and energy issues, and in the realm of global public health. The sources of dissatisfaction are primarily exogenous, and the institutions used to challenge the status quo range from traditional treaties or intergovernmental organizations to informal networks, some of which include non-state actors. Some institutions are winners from the process of contested multilateralism; others may lose authority or status. Although we do not propose an explanatory theory of contested multilateralism, we do suggest that this concept provides a useful framework for understanding changes in regime complexes and the strategies that generate such changes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alter, K., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24.
Bartsch, S. (2007). The global fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. In Global health governance and the fight against HIV/AIDS. Palgrave Macmillan.
Betts, A. (2009). Institutional proliferation and the global refugee regime. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 53–58.
Boese, W. (2003). The proliferation security initiative: an interview with John Bolton. Arms control today. http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_12/PSI. Accessed 12 December 2013.
Bolton, M., & Nash, T. (2010). The role of middle power-NGO coalitions in global policy: the case of the cluster munitions ban. Global Policy, 1, (2), May 2010.
Bot, Y. (2013). Opinion of advocate General Bot: European Commission, Council of the European Union, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs. Yassin Abdullah Kadi. 19 March. Case-law of the Court of Justice (Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P). Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=135223&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1765372. Accessed 23 August 2013.
Byers, M. (2004). Policing the high seas: the proliferation security initiative. The American Journal of International Law, 98(3), 526–545.
Carus, W. S. (2012). Defining “Weapons of mass destruction”. Center for the study of weapons of mass destruction, occasional paper no. 8. Washington, DC: NDU. Available at: http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/pdf/CSWMD-OccasionalPapers/CSWMD_OccationalPaper-8.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2014.
Colgan, J. D. (2009). The international energy agency: Challenges for the 21st century. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute. GPPi Policy Paper Series No. 6.
Colgan, J. D., Keohane, R. O., & Van de Graaf, T. (2012). Punctuated equilibrium in the energy regime complex. The Review of International Organizations, 7(2), 117–143.
Cortright, D., & Lopez, G. (Eds.). (2002). Smart sanctions: Targeting economic statecraft. USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cramer, P. (2003). Recent Swedish experiences with targeted UN sanctions: the erosion of trust in the Security Council. In E. de Wet, A. Nollkaemper & P. Dijkstra (Eds.). Review of the Security Council by member states. Antwerp: Intersentia.
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoom, P. (1998). Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism. International Organization, 52(2), 397–417.
Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ginsborg, L., & Scheinin, M. (2011). You can’t always get what you want: the Kadi II conundrum and the security council 1267 terrorist sanctions regime. Essex Human Rights Review, 8, 7–19.
Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Goose, S., & Williams, J. (2006). The campaign to ban antipersonnel landmines. In R. A. Matthew, B. McDonald, & K. R. Rutherford (Eds.), Landmines and human security: International politics and war’s hidden legacy. New York: SUNY Press.
Gruber, L. (2000). Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of international institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Harman, S. (2012). Global health governance. Global institutions, vol. 60. New York: Routledge.
Helfer, L. R. (2004). Regime shifting: the TRIPs agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property lawmaking. The Yale Journal of International Law, 29, 1–581.
Helfer, L. R. (2005). Exiting Treaties. Virginia Law Review, 91, 1579–1648.
Helfer, L. R. (2009). Regime shifting in the international intellectual property system. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 39–44.
Helfer, L., & Austin, G. W. (2011). Human rights and intellectual property: Mapping the global interface. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heupel, M. (2009). Multilateral sanctions against terror suspects and the violation of due process standards. International Affairs, 85(2), 307-321.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Holmes, J. (2005). Rough waters ahead. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 61(6), 24–25.
International Policy Report: A Victory Over Apartheid (1984). Washington, DC: The Center for International Policy. Available at: http://kora.matrix.msu.edu/files/50/304/32-130-4C3-84-african_activist_archive-a0b2g5-a_12419.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2013.
Interview by Julia Morse of a member of the 1267 Monitoring Team, 15 March 2012.
Interview by Julia Morse of a UN Secretariat official, 19 March 2012.
Jonsson, C. (2012). Changing actors and actions in the global fight against AIDS. In J. Oestreich (Ed.), International organizations as self-directed actors. New York: Routledge.
Joyner, D. H. (2005). The proliferation security initiative: nonproliferation, counterproliferation, and international law. Yale Journal of International Law, 30, 507–548.
Jupille, J., Mattli, W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Institutional choice and global commerce. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karon, T. (2002). SCUD seizure raises tricky questions. Time. 11 Dec. Available at: http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,398592,00.html. Accessed: 13 February 2014.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The culture of national security. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1990). Multilateralism: an agenda for research. International Journal, XLV(4), 731–764.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inquiry in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kohlmorgen, L. (2007). International governmental organizations and global health governance: The role of the world health organization, world bank, and UNAIDS. In W. Hein, S. Bartsch, & L. Kohlmorgen (Eds.), Global health governance and the fight against HIV/AIDS. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Knight, L. (2008). UNAIDS: the first ten years. Switzerland: Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS. Document Number: UNAIDS/07.20E / JC1262.
Koch, S. (2012). Proliferation security initiative: Origins and evolution. Center for the study of weapons of mass destruction, occasional paper no. 9. Washington: NDU Press.
Kraska, J. (2012). Using UNCLOS as a force multiplier for American power. Opinio Juris. Published 14 June 2012. Available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2012/06/14/using-unclos-as-a-force-multiplier-for-american-power/ Accessed: 16 December 2013.
Lee, K. (2009). The World Health Organization (WHO). Global institutions, vol. 26. New York: Routledge.
Maduro, P. (2008). Opinion of Mr. Advocate General Poiares Maduro delivered on 16 January 2008. Kadi v. Council and Commission, Case C-402/05. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005CC0402:EN:NOT. Accessed: 19 December 2013.
Malirsch, M., & Prill, F. (2007). The proliferation security initiative and the 2005 protocol to the SUA Convention. In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 67, 1, S. 229–240.
Mann, J., Tarantola, D., & Netter, T. (1992). AIDS in the world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
May, C., & Sell, S. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Muraskin, W. A. (1998). The politics of international health: The children’s vaccine initiative and the struggle to develop vaccines for the third world. Albany: SUNY Press.
Muraskin, W. A. (2002). The last years of the CVI and the birth of the GAVI. In Public-Private partnerships for global health. Cambridge: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies.
Office of the Ombudsperson of the Security Council’s 1267 Committee. (2013). Status of Cases. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/sc/ombudsperson/status.shtml. Accessed: 1 June 2013.
Oberthur, S., & Gehring, T. (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: the case of the cartagena protocol and the world trade organization. Global Environmental Politics, 6(2), 1–31.
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309.
Rivkin, Jr., D. B., & Casey, L. A. (2003). From The Bermuda to The So San. The National Review. 2 January 2003. Available at: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/205372/i-bermuda-so-san-i/david-b-rivkin-jr. Accessed: 1 September 2013.
Santoro, M. (1995). Pfizer: Global protection of intellectual property. Case study 9-392-073. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Shanks, C., Jacobson, H. K., & Kaplan, J. H. (1996). Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981–1992. International Organization, 50(4), 593–628.
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Steinberg, R. H. (2002). In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization, 56(2), 339–374.
Stone, R. (2011). Controlling institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations (2002). First report of the monitoring group. UN Doc: S/2002/541. 15 May.
United Nations (2005). Third report of monitoring group. UN Doc: S/2005/672. 9 September.
UN Security Council (2002). Resolution 1390. UN Doc S/2002/1390. 28 January.
UN Security Council (2004). Resolution 1540. UN Doc S/2004/1540. 28 April.
UN Security Council (2009). Resolution 1904. UN Doc S/2009/1904. 17 December.
UN Security Council (2011). Resolution 1989. UN Doc S/2011/1989. 17 June.
US State Department (2003). Proliferation security initiative: statement of interdiction principles. PSI Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. Available at: http://www.state.gov/t/isn/c27726.htm. Accessed: 24 August 2013.
Van de Graaf, T. (2013a). Fragmentation in global energy governance: explaining the creation of IRENA. Global Environmental Governance, 13(3), 14–32.
Van de Graaf, T. (2013b). The politics and institutions of global energy Governance. London: Palgrave (forthcoming), especially Chapter 6. Page references from typescript.
Watal, J. (2001). Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Yu, P. K. (2005). Currents and Crosscurrents in the International Intellectual Property Regime. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 38, 323–444.