3D bioprinted hyaluronic acid-based cell-laden scaffold for brain microenvironment simulation

Bio-Design and Manufacturing - 2020
Liang Ma1,2, Yuting Li1,2, Yutong Wu1,2, Mengfei Yu3, Abdellah Aazmi1,2, Lei Gao1,2, Qian Xue1,2, Yichen Luo1,2, Hongzhao Zhou1,2, Bin Zhang1,2, Huayong Yang1,2
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
2State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
3The Affiliated Stomatologic Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Tóm tắt

Treatments for lesions in central nervous system (CNS) are always faced with challenges due to the anatomical and physiological particularity of the CNS despite the fact that several achievements have been made in early diagnosis and precision medicine to improve the survival and quality of life of patients with brain tumors in recent years. Understanding the complexity as well as role of the microenvironment of brain tumors may suggest a better revealing of the molecular mechanism of brain tumors and new therapeutic directions, which requires an accurate recapitulation of the complex microenvironment of human brain in vitro. Here, a 3D bioprinted in vitro brain matrix-mimetic microenvironment model with hyaluronic acid (HA) and normal glial cells (HEBs) is developed which simulates both mechanical and biological properties of human brain microenvironment in vivo through the investigation of the formulation of bioinks and optimization of printing process and parameters to study the effects of different concentration of gelatin (GA) within the bioink and different printing structures of the scaffold on the performance of the brain matrix-mimetic microenvironment models. The study provides experimental models for the exploration of the multiple factors in the brain microenvironment and scaffolds for GBM invasion study.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Rao SS, Lannutti JJ, Viapiano MS, Sarkar A, Winter JO (2014) Toward 3D biomimetic models to understand the behavior of glioblastoma multiforme cells. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 20:314–327

Kirkpatrick JP, Laack NN, Shih HA, Gondi V (2017) Management of GBM: a problem of local recurrence. J Neurooncol 134:487–493

Wang K, Florczyk S, Kievit F, Zhang MQ (2014) Culture of human GBM cells on ECM-mimicking chitosan-hyaluronic acid scaffolds increases malignancy and drug resistance. Neuro-Oncol 16:v124

Florczyk SJ, Wang K, Jana S, Wood DL, Sytsma SK, Sham J, Kievit FM, Zhang M (2013) Porous chitosan-hyaluronic acid scaffolds as a mimic of glioblastoma microenvironment ECM. Biomaterials 34:10143–10150

Stock K, Estrada MF, Vidic S, Gjerde K, Rudisch A, Santo VE, Barbier M, Blom S, Arundkar SC, Selvam I, Osswald A, Stein Y, Gruenewald S, Brito C, Van Weerden W, Rotter V, Boghaert E, Oren M, Sommergruber W, Chong Y, De Hoogt R, Graeser R (2016) Capturing tumor complexity in vitro: comparative analysis of 2D and 3D tumor models for drug discovery. Sci Rep 6:28951

Rodenhizer D, Dean T, D'arcangelo E, Mcguigan AP (2018) The current landscape of 3D in vitro tumor models: what cancer hallmarks are accessible for drug discovery? Adv Healthc Mater 7:e1701174

Ferreira LP, Gaspar VM, Mano JF (2018) Design of spherically structured 3D in vitro tumor models -Advances and prospects. Acta Biomater 75:11–34

Tsai CW, Wang JH, Young TH (2018) Core/shell multicellular spheroids on chitosan as in vitro 3D coculture tumor models. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46:S651–S660

Pang Y, Mao SS, Yao R, He JY, Zhou ZZ, Feng L, Zhang KT, Cheng SJ, Sun W (2018) TGF-beta induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in an advanced cervical tumor model by 3D printing. Biofabrication 10:044102

Santo VE, Rebelo SP, Estrada MF, Alves PM, Boghaert E, Brito C (2017) Drug screening in 3D in vitro tumor models: overcoming current pitfalls of efficacy read-outs. Biotechnol J 12

Nunes AS, Barros AS, Costa EC, Moreira AF, Correia IJ (2019) 3D tumor spheroids as in vitro models to mimic in vivo human solid tumors resistance to therapeutic drugs. Biotechnol Bioeng 116:206–226

Ma L, Barker J, Zhou C, Li W, Zhang J, Lin B, Foltz G, Kublbeck J, Honkakoski P (2012) Towards personalized medicine with a three-dimensional micro-scale perfusion-based two-chamber tissue model system. Biomaterials 33:4353–4361

Gill EL, Li X, Birch MA, Huang YYS (2018) Multi-length scale bioprinting towards simulating microenvironmental cues. Bio-Des Manuf 1:77–88

Zhang B, Luo YC, Ma L, Gao L, Li YT, Xue Q, Yang HY, Cui ZF (2018) 3D bioprinting: an emerging technology full of opportunities and challenges. Bio-Des Manuf 1:2–13

Jian HL, Wang MY, Wang ST, Wang AH, Bai S (2018) 3D bioprinting for cell culture and tissue fabrication. Bio-Des Manuf 1:45–61

Wang X, Zhang X, Dai X, Wang X, Li X, Diao J, Xu T (2018) Tumor-like lung cancer model based on 3D bioprinting. 3 Biotechnology 8:501

Zahedi-Tabar Z, Bagheri-Khoulenjani S, Mirzadeh H, Amanpour S (2019) 3D in vitro cancerous tumor models: using 3D printers. Med Hypotheses 124:91–94

Zhang B, Gao L, Ma L, Luo YC, Yang HY, Cui ZF (2019) 3D Bioprinting: a novel avenue for manufacturing tissues and organs. Engineering 5:777–794

Albritton JL, Miller JS (2017) 3D bioprinting: improving in vitro models of metastasis with heterogeneous tumor microenvironments. Dis Model Mech 10:3–14

Ma H, Luo J, Sun Z, Xia L, Shi M, Liu M, Chang J, Wu C (2016) 3D printing of biomaterials with mussel-inspired nanostructures for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 111:138–148

Zhang YS, Duchamp M, Oklu R, Ellisen LW, Langer R, Khademhosseini A (2016) Bioprinting the cancer microenvironment. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1710–1721

Choi YR, Kim JH, Park SJ, Hur BY, Han JK (2017) Therapeutic response assessment using 3D ultrasound for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: application of a personalized, 3D-printed tumor model using CT images. PLoS ONE 12:e0182596

Heinrich MA, Bansal R, Lammers T, Zhang YS, Michel Schiffelers R, Prakash J (2019) 3D-bioprinted mini-brain: a glioblastoma model to study cellular interactions and therapeutics. Adv Mater 31:e1806590

Dai X, Ma C, Lan Q, Xu T (2016) 3D bioprinted glioma stem cells for brain tumor model and applications of drug susceptibility. Biofabrication 8:045005

Dai X, Liu L, Ouyang J, Li X, Zhang X, Lan Q, Xu T (2017) Coaxial 3D bioprinting of self-assembled multicellular heterogeneous tumor fibers. Sci Rep 7:1457

Wang X, Li X, Dai X, Zhang X, Zhang J, Xu T, Lan Q (2018) Coaxial extrusion bioprinted shell-core hydrogel microfibers mimic glioma microenvironment and enhance the drug resistance of cancer cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 171:291–299

Yi HG, Jeong YH, Kim Y, Choi YJ, Moon HE, Park SH, Kang KS, Bae M, Jang J, Youn H, Paek SH, Cho DW (2019) A bioprinted human-glioblastoma-on-a-chip for the identification of patient-specific responses to chemoradiotherapy. Nat Biomed Eng 3:509–519

Han HW, Hsu SH (2017) Using 3D bioprinting to produce mini-brain. Neural Regener Res 12:1595–1596

Stratesteffen H, Kopf M, Kreimendahl F, Blaeser A, Jockenhoevel S, Fischer H (2017) GelMA-collagen blends enable drop-on-demand 3D printablility and promote angiogenesis. Biofabrication 9:045002

Das D, Pham TTH, Noh I (2018) Characterizations of hyaluronate-based terpolymeric hydrogel synthesized via free radical polymerization mechanism for biomedical applications. Colloid Surf B 170:64–75

Highley CB, Prestwich GD, Burdick JA (2016) Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 40:35–40

Ananthanarayanan B, Kim Y, Kumar S (2011) Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. Biomaterials 32:7913–7923

Noh I, Kim N, Tran HN, Lee J, Lee C (2019) 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering. Biomater Res 23:3

Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689

Flanagan LA, Ju YE, Marg B, Osterfield M, Janmey PA (2002) Neurite branching on deformable substrates. NeuroReport 13:2411–2415

Iwashita M, Kataoka N, Toida K, Kosodo Y (2014) Systematic profiling of spatiotemporal tissue and cellular stiffness in the developing brain. Development 141:3793–3798

Iwashita M, Ohta H, Fujisawa T, Cho M, Ikeya M, Kidoaki S, Kosodo Y (2019) Brain-stiffness-mimicking tilapia collagen gel promotes the induction of dorsal cortical neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep 9:3068

Kalra P, Raterman B, Mo X, Kolipaka A (2019) Magnetic resonance elastography of brain: comparison between anisotropic and isotropic stiffness and its correlation to age. Magn Reson Med 82:671–679

Takamura T, Motosugi U, Sasaki Y, Kakegawa T, Sato K, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL, Onishi H (2019) Influence of age on global and regional brain stiffness in young and middle-aged adults. J Magn Reson Imaging 51:727–733

Yang Y, Wang K, Gu X, Leong KW (2017) Biophysical regulation of cell behavior-cross talk between substrate stiffness and nanotopography. Engineering (Beijing) 3:36–54

Liu LY, Duclos G, Sun B, Lee J, Wu A, Kam Y, Sontag ED, Stone HA, Sturm JC, Gatenby RA, Austin RH (2013) Minimization of thermodynamic costs in cancer cell invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:1686–1691

Ma L, Zhang B, Zhou C, Li Y, Li B, Yu M, Luo Y, Gao L, Zhang D, Xue Q, Qiu Q, Lin B, Zou J, Yang H (2018) The comparison genomics analysis with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells under 3D and 2D cell culture conditions. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 172:665–673

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Bio-Design and Manufacturing

Thông tin tác giả