3D biofabrication for tubular tissue engineering
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Basu J, Ludlow JW (2010) Platform technologies for tubular organ regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 28:526–533
Pashneh-Tala S, MacNeil S, Claeyssens F (2015) The tissue-engineered vascular graft–past, present, and future. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100
Shinoka T, Breuer C (2008) Tissue-engineered blood vessels in pediatric cardiac surgery. Yale J Biol Med 81:161–166
Pati F et al (2014) Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun 5:1–11
Mao AS, Mooney DJ (2015) Regenerative medicine: current therapies and future directions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:14452–14459
Byrom MJ, Ng MKC, Bannon PG (2013) Biomechanics and biocompatibility of the perfect conduit—can we build one? Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:435–443
Syedain ZH, Meier LA, Bjork JW, Lee A, Tranquillo RT (2011) Implantable arterial grafts from human fibroblasts and fibrin using a multi-graft pulsed flow-stretch bioreactor with noninvasive strength monitoring. Biomaterials 32:714–722
Patterson JT et al (2012) Tissue-engineered vascular grafts for use in the treatment of congenital heart disease: from the bench to the clinic and back again. Regen Med 7:409–419
Campbell GR, Campbell JH (2007) Development of tissue engineered vascular grafts. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 8:43–50
Kumar V, Brewster L, Caves J, Chaikof E (2011) Tissue engineering of blood vessels: functional requirements, progress, and future challenges. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2:137–148
Hunsberger J et al (2015) Manufacturing road map for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine technologies. Stem Cells Transl Med 4:130–135
Cornelissen D-J, Faulkner-Jones A, Shu W (2017) Current developments in 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2:76–82
Kim JE, Kim SH, Jung Y (2016) Current status of three-dimensional printing inks for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med 13:636–646
Kang H-W et al (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34:312–319
Biglino G et al (2017) Piloting the use of patient-specific cardiac models as a novel tool to facilitate communication during cinical consultations. Pediatr Cardiol 38:813–818
Zhu W et al (2017) Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials 124:106–115
Datta P, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT (2017) Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater 51:1–20
Morrison RJ et al (2016) Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients. Sci Transl Med 21:4062–4072
Chang JW et al (2014) Tissue-engineered tracheal reconstruction using three-dimensionally printed artificial tracheal graft: preliminary report. Artif Organs 38:E95–E105
Hibino N et al (2010) Late-term results of tissue-engineered vascular grafts in humans. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:431–436.e2
Syedain ZH, Meier LA, Lahti MT, Johnson SL, Tranquillo RT (2014) Implantation of completely biological engineered grafts following decellularization into the sheep femoral artery. Tissue Eng Part A 20:1726–1734
Schutte SC, Chen Z, Brockbank KGM, Nerem RM (2010) Cyclic strain improves strength and function of a collagen-based tissue-engineered vascular media. Tissue Eng Part A 16:3149–3157
Tillman BW et al (2012) Bioengineered vascular access maintains structural integrity in response to arteriovenous flow and repeated needle puncture. J Vasc Surg 56:783–793
Olausson M et al (2012) Transplantation of an allogeneic vein bioengineered with autologous stem cells: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet 380:230–237
Sampaziotis F et al (2017) Reconstruction of the mouse extrahepatic biliary tree using primary human extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids. Nat Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4360
Delaere PR, Van Raemdonck D (2014) The trachea: the first tissue-engineered organ? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:1128–1132
Weinberg C, Bell E (1986) A blood vessel model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells. Science 231:397–400
Heureux NL, Labbe R, Germain L, Auger OISA (1998) A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood. FASEB J 12:47–56
Kumar VA et al (2013) Acellular vascular grafts generated from collagen and elastin analogs. Acta Biomater 9:8067–8074
Othman R et al (2015) An automated fabrication strategy to create patterned tubular architectures at cell and tissue scales. Biofabrication 7:025003
Ghanizadeh Tabriz A, Mills CG, Mullins JJ, Davies JA, Shu W (2017) Rapid fabrication of cell-laden alginate hydrogel 3D structures by micro dip-coating. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 5:13
Wilkens CA et al (2017) Layer-by-layer approach for a uniformed fabrication of a cell patterned vessel-like construct. Biofabrication 9:015001
Seifarth V et al (2017) Mechanical induction of bi-directional orientation of primary porcine bladder smooth muscle cells in tubular fibrin-poly(vinylidene fluoride) scaffolds for ureteral and urethral repair using cyclic and focal balloon catheter stimulation. J Biomater Appl 32:321–330
Saeidi N, Sander EA, Ruberti JW (2009) Dynamic shear-influenced collagen self-assembly. Biomaterials 30:6581–6592
Zhang B et al (2018) 3D bioprinting: an emerging technology full of opportunities and challenges. Bio-Des Manuf 1:2–13
Groll J et al (2016) Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8:013001
Jian H, Wang M, Wang S, Wang A, Bai S (2018) 3D bioprinting for cell culture and tissue fabrication. Bio-Des Manuf 1:45–61
Kyle S, Whitaker IS (2018) To print or not to print, that is the question: how close are we to clinical translation of contemporary bioinks? J 3D Print Med 2:1–3
Zhang Z, Wang B, Hui D, Qiu J, Wang S (2017) 3D bioprinting of soft materials-based regenerative vascular structures and tissues. Compos Part B 123:279–291
Odde DJ, Renn MJ (1999) Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 17:385–389
Michael S et al (2013) Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS One 8:e57741
Arcaute K, Mann B, Wicker R (2010) Stereolithography of spatially controlled multi-material bioactive poly(ethylene glycol) scaffolds. Acta Biomater 6:1047–1054
Ovsianikov A et al (2014) Laser photofabrication of cell-containing hydrogel constructs. Langmuir 30:3787–3794
Ozbolat IT (2017) 3D bioprinting fundamentals principles and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Tan EYS, Yeong WY (2015) Concentric bioprinting of alginate-based tubular constructs using multi-nozzle extrusion-based technique. Int J Bioprint 1:49–56
Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, Lewis JA (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:3179–3184
Kolesky DB et al (2014) 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater 26:3124–3130
Miller JS et al (2012) Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat Mater 11:768–774
Lee VK et al (2014) Generation of multi-scale vascular network system within 3D hydrogel using 3D bio-printing technology. Cell Mol Bioeng 7:460–472
Hinton TJ et al (2015) Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv 1:e1500758–e1500758
Hinton TJ, Hudson A, Pusch K, Lee A, Feinberg AW (2016) 3D printing PDMS elastomer in a hydrophilic support bath via freeform reversible embedding. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1781–1786
Itoh M, Nakayama K, Noguchi R, Kamohara K, Furukawa K (2015) Scaffold-free tubular tissues created by a bio-3D printer undergo remodeling and endothelialization when implanted in rat aortae. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136681
Moldovan NI, Hibino N, Nakayama K (2017) Principles of the Kenzan method for robotic cell spheroid-based three-dimensional bioprinting $$<$$ < sup/ $$>$$ > . Tissue Eng Part B Rev 23:237–244
Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, Forgacs G (2009) Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30:5910–5917
Zhang Y, Yu Y, Ozbolat IT (2013) Direct bioprinting of vessel-like tubular microfluidic channels. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 4:20902
Gao Q, He Y, Fu J, Liu A, Ma L (2015) Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials 61:203–215
Jia W et al (2016) Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials 106:58–68
Gao Q et al (2017) 3D bioprinting of vessel-like structures with multilevel fluidic channels. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3:399–408
Moroni L et al (2017) Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015
Chung JHY et al (2013) Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomater Sci 1:763
Catto V, Farè S, Freddi G, Tanzi MC (2014) Vascular tissue engineering: recent advances in small diameter blood vessel regeneration. ISRN Vasc Med 2014:1–27
Nicmodeus GD, Bryant SJ (2008) Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 14:149–165
Pawar SN, Edgar KJ (2012) Alginate derivatization: a review of chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials 33:3279–3305
Shoichet MS, Li RH, White ML, Winn SR (1996) Stability of hydrogels used in cell encapsulation: an in vitro comparison of alginate and agarose. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:374–381
Cohen DL et al (2011) Increased mixing improves hydrogel homogeneity and quality of three-dimensional printed constructs. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17:239–248
Gao G et al (2017) Tissue engineered bio-blood-vessels constructed using a tissue-specific bioink and 3D coaxial cell printing technique: a novel therapy for ischemic disease. Adv Funct Mater 27:1700798
Patel A, Fine B, Sandig M, Mequanint K (2006) Elastin biosynthesis: the missing link in tissue-engineered blood vessels. Cardiovasc Res 71:40–49
Lee JH, El-Fiqi A, Han CM, Kim HW (2015) Physically-strengthened collagen bioactive nanocomposite gels for bone: a feasibility study. Tissue Eng Regener Med 12:90–97
Diniz IMA et al (2015) Pluronic F-127 hydrogel as a promising scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:1–10
Sun K, Raghavan SR (2010) Thermogelling aqueous fluids containing low concentrations of pluronic F127 and laponite nanoparticles. Langmuir 26:8015–8020
Yap LS, Yang MC (2016) Evaluation of hydrogel composing of Pluronic F127 and carboxymethyl hexanoyl chitosan as injectable scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 146:204–211
Gioffredi E et al (2016) Pluronic F127 hydrogel characterization and biofabrication in cellularized constructs for tissue engineering applications. Proc CIRP 49:125–132
Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, Hoying JB (2011) Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 98 B:160–170
Suntornnond R, An J, Chua CK (2017) Bioprinting of thermoresponsive hydrogels for next generation tissue engineering: a review. Macromol Mater Eng 302:1–15
Suntornnond R, Tan EYS, An J, Chua CK (2017) A highly printable and biocompatible hydrogel composite for direct printing of soft and perfusable vasculature-like structures. Sci Rep 7:1–11
Li C et al (2015) Rapid formation of a supramolecular polypeptide-DNA Hydrogel for in situ three-dimensional multilayer bioprinting. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:3957–3961
Wang Y et al (2017) Constructing tissue like complex structures using cell-laden DNA hydrogel bricks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:12311–12315
Shao Y, Jia H, Cao T, Liu D (2017) Supramolecular hydrogels based on DNA self-assembly. Acc Chem Res 50:659–668
Shi J, Jia H, Liu D (2017) pH-responsive supramolecular hydrogel based on one short strand DNA. Acta Polym Sin 1:135–142
Li C et al (2017) A supramolecular hydrogel with identical cross-linking point density but distinctive rheological properties. Mater Chem Front 1:654–659
Li Y-C, Zhang YS, Akpek A, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A (2016) 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli–responsive materials. Biofabrication 9:12001
Li P (2018) 3D bioprinting: regulation, innovation, and patents. In: 3D bioprinting for reconstructive surgery. Elsevier, pp 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101103-4.00020-X
Kelly E (2018) FDA regulation of 3D-printed organs and associated ethical challenges. Univ PA Law Rev 166:515–545