3D-QSAR studies on glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors by flexible comparative molecular field analysis

Cramer R D, Patterson D E, Bunce J D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc, 1988, 110: 5959–5967

Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T. Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J Med Chem, 1994, 37: 4130–4146

Silverman B D, Platt D E. Comparative molecular moment analysis (CoMMA): 3D-QSAR without molecular superposition. J Med Chem, 1996, 39: 2129–2140

Zhou P, Tong J, Tian F, Li Z. A novel comparative molecule/pseudo receptor interaction analysis. Chin Sci Bull (in Chinese), 2006, 51(15): 1824–1829

Gaillard P, Carrupt P A, Testa B, Schambel P. Binding of arylpiperazines, (aryloxy) propanolamines, and tetrahydropyridylindoles to the 5-HT1A receptor: contribution of the molecular lipophilicity potential to three-dimensional quantitative structure-affinity relationship models. J Med Chem, 1996, 39(1): 126–134

Kellogg G E, Kier L B, Gaillard P, Hall L H. The E-state fields. Application to 3D QSAR. J Comp-Aid Mol Des, 1996, 10: 513–520

Waller C L, Marshall G R. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of angiotesin-converting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors. II. A comparison of CoMFA models incorporating molecular orbital fields and desolvation free energies based on active-analog and complementary-receptor-field alignment rules. J Med Chem, 1993, 36: 2390–2403

DePriest S A, Mayer D, Naylor C B, Marshall G R. 3D-QSAR of angiotensin-converting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors: a comparison of CoMFA models based on deduced and experimentally determined active site geometries. J Am Chem Soc, 1993, 115(13): 5372–5384

Welsh W J, Tong W D, Collantes E R, Chickos J S, Gagarin S G. Enthalpies of sublimation and formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) derived from comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) — application of moment of inertia for molecular alignment. Thermochem Acta, 1997, 290: 55–64

Bondi A. van der Waals volumes and radii. J Phys Chem, 1964, 68(3): 441–451

Levitt M. Protein folding by restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics: J Mol Biol, 1983, 170: 723–764

Hahn M. Receptor surface models. 1. Definition and construction. J Med Chem, 1995, 38(12): 2080–2090

Tanford C. The hydrophobic effect and the organization of living matter. Science, 1978, 200: 1012–1018

Kellogg G E, Semus S F, Abraham D J. HINT—a new method of empirical hydrophobic field calculation for CoMFA. J Comp-Aid Mol Des, 1991, 5: 545–552

Hasel W, Hendrikson T F, Still W C. A rapid approximation to the solvent accessible surface areas of atoms. Tetrahed Comp Method, 1988, 1: 103–116

Pei J, Wang Q, Zhou J, Lai L. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation. Proteins, 2004, 57:651–664

Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neutral Networks, 1995, 1942–1948

Bollen M, Hue L, Stalmans W. Effects of glucose on phosphorylase and glycogen synthase in hepatocytes from diabetic rats. Biochem J, 1983, 210: 783–787

Venkatarangan P, Hopfinger A J. Prediction of ligand-receptor binding free energy by 4D-QSAR analysis: application to a set of glucose analogue inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 1999, 39: 1141–1150

Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar V K. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and inerpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci, 2003, 22: 69–77

Shi Y, Eberhart R C. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 1945–1950

Kennedy J. Thinking is social: experiments with the adaptive culture model. J Conf Res, 1998, 42: 56–76