15N-nitrate-labelling demonstrates a size symmetric competitive effect on belowground resource uptake
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aerts R, Boot RGA, van der Aart PJM (1991) The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87:551–559
Bartelheimer M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W (2006) Aggregative root placement: a feature during interspecific competition in inland sand-dune habitats. Plant Soil 280:101–114
Berendse F (1990) Organic matter accumulation and nitrogen mineralization during secondary succession in heathland ecosystems. J Ecol 78:413–427
Berger AG, McDonald AJ, Riha SJ (2006) Scaling plant size to below-ground zone of influence in annuals under contrasting competitive environments. Funct Ecol 20:770–777
Berntson GM, Wayne PM (2000) Characterizing the size dependence of resource acquisition within crowded plant populations. Ecology 81:1072–1085
Bertin C, Yang X, Weston LA (2003) The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83
Boorman LA (1982) Some plant growth patterns in relation to the sand dune habitat. J Ecol 70:607–614
Brady DJ, Gregory PJ, Fillery IRP (1993) The contribution of different regions of the seminal roots of wheat to uptake of nitrate from soil. Plant Soil 155:155–158
Cahill JF Jr (2003) Lack of relationship between below-ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland species. J Ecol 91:532–540
Cahill JF Jr, Casper BB (2000) Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. OIKOS 90:311–320
Cahill JF Jr, Kembel SW, Gustafson DJ (2005) Differential genetic influences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Ecol 93:958–967
Caldwell MM, Eissenstat DM, Richards JH, Allen FM (1985) Competition for phosphorus: differential uptake from dual-isotope-labeled soil interspaces between shrub and grass. Science 229:384–386
Casper BB, Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2003) Defining a plant’s belowground zone of influence. Ecology 84:2313–2321
Clarkson DT, Hanson JB (1980) The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31:239–298
Craine JM, Fargione J, Sugita S (2005) Supply preemption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytol 166:933–940
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002) Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295:1517–1520
Fitter AH, Williamson L, Linkohr B, Leyser O (2002) Root system achitecture determines fitness in an Arabidopsis mutant in competition for immobile phosphat ions but not for nitrate ions. Proc R Soc Lond 269:2017–2022
Forde BG (2000) Nitrate transporters in plants: structure, function and regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 165:219–235
Fransen B, De Kroon H, Berendse F (2001) Soil nutrient heterogeneity alters competition between two perennial grass species. Ecology 82:2534–2546
Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2001) Asymmetric competition between plant species. Funct Ecol 15:615–623
Gages DJ, Westcott M (1978) Zone of influence models for competition in plantations. Adv Appl Probab 10:499–537
Goldberg DE (1990) Components of resource competition in plant communities. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, London
Goldberg DE, Fleetwood L (1987) Competitive effect and response in four annual plants. J Ecol 75:1131–1143
Goldberg DE, Landa K (1991) Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J Ecol 79:1013–1030
Goldberg DE, Werner PA (1983) Equivalence of competitors in plant communities: a null-hypothesis and a field experimental approach. Am J Bot 70:1098–1104
Hegi G (1979) Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-europa. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg
Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2001) Nitrogen uptake and use by competing individuals in a Xanthium canadense stand. Oecologia 126:174–181
Hodge A, Robinson D, Griffiths B, Fitter AH (1999) Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant Cell Environ 22:811–820
Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L, Wisheu IC (1994) Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants: are they consistent across three environments? J Ecol 82:635–643
Law R, Watkinson AR (1987) Response-surface analysis of two-species competition: an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. J Ecol 75:871–886
Markham JH, Chanway CP (1996) Measuring plant neighbour effects. Funct Ecol 10:548–549
Munoz AE, Weaver RW (1999) Competition between subterranean clover and ryegrass for uptake of 15N-labeled fertilizer. Plant Soil 211:173–178
Näsholm T, Huss-Danell K, Högberg M (2000) Uptake of organic nitrogen in the field by four agriculturally important plant species. Ecology 81:1155–1161
Newbery DM, Newman EI (1978) Competition between grassland plants of different initial sizes. Oecologia 33:361–380
Pless H (1995) Pflanzensoziologische Untersuchungen der Trockenrasen an den Hängen des Odertales zwischen Seelow und Frankfurt (Oder). Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Brandenburg 3:27–31
Rajaniemi T (2003) Evidence for size asymmetry of belowground competition. Basic Appl Ecol 4:239–247
Remans T, Nacry P, Pervent M, Girin T, Tillard P, Lepetit M, Gojon A (2006) A central role for the nitrate transporter NRT2.1 in the integrated morphological and physiological responses of the root system to nitrogen limitation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 140:909–921
Robe WE, Griffiths H, Sleep D, Quarmby C (1994) Nitrogen partitioning and assimitlation: methods for the extraction, separation and mass spectrometric analysis of nitrate, amino acid and soluble protein pools from individual plant following 15N labelling. Plant Cell Environ 17:1073–1079
Robinson D, Hodge A, Griffiths B, Fitter AH (1999) Plant root proliferation in nitrogen-rich patches confers competitive advantage. Proc R Soc Lond 266:431–435
Schwinning S, Weiner J (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447–455
Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJG (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303:1876–1879
Tilman D, Wedin D (1991) Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72:685–700
Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720
Vojtech E, Turnball LA, Hector A (2007) Differences in light interception in grass monocultures predict short-term competitive outcomes under productive conditions. PLoS ONE 2, e499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000499
von Wettberg EJ, Weiner J (2003) Larger Triticum aestivum plants do not preempt nutrient-rich patches in a glasshouse experiment. Plant Ecol 169:85–92
Wassen MJ, Olde Venterink H, Lapshina ED, Tanneberger F (2005) Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation. Nature 437:547–550
Weigelt A, Röttgermann M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W (2000) Influence of water availability on competitive interactions between plant species on sandy soils. Folia Geobot 35:169–178
Weigelt A, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W (2005) Competition in inland dunes: the impact of water availability on below-ground processes. Plant Ecol 176:57–68
Weigelt A, Schumacher J, Walther T, Bartelheimer M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W (2007) Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi-species communities. J Ecol 95:53–64
Weiner J (1986) How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations. Ecology 67:1425–1427
Weiner J, Wright DB, Castro S (1997) Symmetry of belowground competition between Kochia scoparia individuals. OIKOS 79:85–91
Wijesinghe DK, John AJ, Beurskens S, Hutchings MJ (2001) Root system size and precision in nutrient foraging: responses to spatial pattern of nutrient supply in six herbaceous species. J Ecol 89:972–983