100 Consecutive Cases of Degenerative Lumbar Conditions Using a Non-Threaded Locking Screw System With a 90-Degree Locking Cap

Blumenthal, 2005, A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes, Spine, 30, 1565, 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e Delamarter, 2005, Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial, Orthop Clin North Am., 36, 301, 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.03.004 Fritzell, 2003, Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group, Eur Spine J., 12, 178, 10.1007/s00586-002-0493-8 Fritzell, 2002, Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group, Spine, 27, 1131, 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00002 Leufven, 1999, Spine, 24, 2042, 10.1097/00007632-199910010-00014 Steffee, 1988, Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and plates, Clin Orthop, 227, 99, 10.1097/00003086-198802000-00013 Brantigan, 1994, Pseudarthrosis rate after allograft posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw and plate fixation, Spine, 19, 1271, 10.1097/00007632-199405310-00014 Brantigan, 1997, Carbon fiber interbody fusion cages: indications, results, and radiographic interpretation of fusion, Spine, State of the Art Reviews, 11, 287 Brantigan, 1993, A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion: two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients, Spine, 18, 2106, 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030 Brantigan, 1991, A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion: mechanical testing, Spine, 16, S277, 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00020 Brantigan, 2000, Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial, Spine, 25, 1437, 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00017 Enker, 1994, Interbody fusion and instrumentation, Clin Orthop, 30, 90 Madan, 2003, Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion, Eur Spine J, 12, 567, 10.1007/s00586-002-0516-5 Tulberg, 1996, Fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with carbon fiber implant: one-year follow-up of 51 patients, Eur Spine J, 5, 178, 10.1007/BF00395510 McAfee, 2005, The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: analysis of 120 cases, Spine, 30, S60, 10.1097/01.brs.0000155578.62680.dd Shirado, 1991, Biomechanical evaluation of methods of posterior stabilization of the spine and posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis for lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis: a calf spine model, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 73-A, 518, 10.2106/00004623-199173040-00007 Lenke, 1992, Results of in-situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis, J Spinal Disord, 5, 433, 10.1097/00002517-199212000-00008 Shono, 1993, A biomechanical analysis of decompression and reconstruction methods in the cervical spine: emphasis on a carbon fiber composite cage, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 75-A, 1674, 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00012 Brantigan, 1993, Compression strength of donor bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Spine, 18, 1213, 10.1097/00007632-199307000-00015 Brantigan, 1994, Interbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone: an investigational study in the Spanish goat, Spine, 19, 1436, 10.1097/00007632-199407000-00002