BRAF‐V600E immunohistochemistry in a large series of glial and glial–neuronal tumors

Brain and Behavior - Tập 7 Số 3 - 2017
Quentin Breton1, Hélène Plouhinec1, Delphine Prunier‐Mirebeau2, Blandine Boisselier3,1, Sophie Michalak1, Philippe Meneï3,4, Audrey Rousseau3,1
1Pathology Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
2Genetics and Biochemistry Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
3INSERM UMR-1066, Micro- and Nanomedicine Biomimetics (MINT), Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
4Neurosurgery Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France

Tóm tắt

AbstractIntroductionSome glial–neuronal tumors (GNT) (pleomorphic xantho‐astrocytoma [PXA], ganglioglioma [GG]) display BRAF‐V600E mutation, which represents a diagnostic clue to these entities. Targeted therapies against BRAF‐V600 protein have shown promising results in GNT. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of BRAF‐V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC, clone VE1) in daily practice in a series of 140 glial, and GNT compared to molecular biology (MB) techniques.MethodsWe performed BRAF‐V600E IHC on all 140 cases. We used Sanger sequencing and allele‐specific quantitative PCR (ASQPCR) to detect BRAF‐V600E mutation when sufficient amount of materiel was available.ResultsBRAF‐V600E immunostaining was detected in 29.5% of cases (41/140 cases; 61.5% GG/GC/AGG (32/52), 33% PXA, 6.6% pilocytic astrocytomas). In 47 cases, MB could be performed: Sanger sequencing and ASQPCR in 34 cases, ASQPCR only in 11 cases, and Sanger sequencing only in two cases. In initial tumors, Sanger sequencing identified BRAF‐V600E mutation in 19.5% tumors (seven of 36 tested cases). ASQPCR showed mutation in 48.5% tumors (17/35 tested cases). In six cases (5 GG, one PXA), the results were discordant between IHC and MB; the five GG cases were immunopositive for BRAF‐V600E but wild type with both MB techniques. In another 7 GG, the percentage of mutated (ganglion) cells was low, and Sanger sequencing failed to detect the mutation, which was detected by IHC and ASQPCR.ConclusionsIn tumors with few mutated cells (e.g., GG), anti‐BRAF‐V600E IHC appears more sensitive than Sanger sequencing. The latter, although considered as the gold standard, is not to be used up‐front to detect BRAF mutation in GG. The combination of IHC and ASQPCR appears more efficient to appraise the indication of targeted therapies in these glioneuronal tumors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182549b50

10.1097/NEN.0000000000000213

10.1186/s13000‐016‐0506‐2

10.1016/j.humpath.2012.07.010

10.1038/ng.2868

10.1007/s00401‐011‐0841‐z

10.1111/bpa.12048

10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.09.001

10.1371/journal.pone.0017948

10.1093/neuonc/nos218

10.1093/neuonc/noq007

10.1097/NEN.0000000000000226

10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.022

10.3892/ol.2013.1713

10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.11.011

10.1093/neuonc/nos204

10.1186/2051‐5960‐1‐20

10.1186/1471‐2407‐14‐13

10.1158/0008‐5472.CAN‐08‐2097

10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827f9c5e

10.1097/PAS.0000000000000363

10.1111/bpa.12111

10.1007/s00401‐013‐1100‐2

10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1766

10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826485c0

10.1007/s00401‐007‐0243‐4

10.1038/sj.onc.1210704

10.1043/1543‐2165‐133.10.1600

10.1097/CMR.0000000000000055

10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.10.005

10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.010

10.1146/annurev‐pathol‐020712‐164009

10.1111/bpa.12167

10.1517/14740338.2014.939954

10.1182/blood‐2012‐06‐429597

10.1007/s00401‐011‐0802‐6

10.1056/NEJMoa1112302