‘You're looking for different parts in a jigsaw’: foetal MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) as an emerging technology in professional practice

Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 38 Số 5 - Trang 736-752 - 2016
Kate Reed1, Inna Kochetkova2, Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson1
1Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, UK
2School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was first introduced into clinical practice during the 1980s. Originally used as a diagnostic tool to take pictures of the brain, spine, and joints, it is now used to visualise a range of organs and soft tissue around the body. Developments in clinical applications of the technology are rapid and it is often viewed as the ‘gold standard’ in many areas of medicine. However, most existing sociological work on MRI tends to focus on the profession of radiology, little is known about the impact of MRI on a broader range of clinical practice. This article focuses on MRI use in pregnancy, a relatively new application of the technology. Drawing on empirical research with a range of health professionals (from radiologists to pathologists) in the North of England, this article asks: how do different types of health professionals engage with the technology and to what end? It will argue that MRI use in pregnancy offers an increasingly important piece of the diagnostic jigsaw, often acting as a bridging technology between medical specialties. The implications of this will be explored in the context of broader sociological debates on the ‘visualisation’ of medicine and its impact on professionals.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00459-0

10.1002/jmri.20770

10.1177/0306312707082021

Casper M., 1998, The making of the unborn patient: social anatomy of fetal surgery

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199803)18:3<247::AID-PD253>3.0.CO;2-J

10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340410

10.1111/1467-9566.00318

10.1515/9780691236629

Dussauge I.(2008)Technomedical visions: magnetic resonance imaging in 1980s Sweden Division of History of Science and Technology Royal Institute of Technology KTH Stockholm papers in the History and Philosophy of Technology.

Fox N., 1992, The social meaning of surgery

Galison P., 1997, Image and logic: a material culture of Microphysics

10.1111/1467-9566.00341

10.1111/1467-9566.12096

10.1007/978-0-230-21175-9

Joyce J., 2006, Magnetic appeal: MRI and the myth of transparency

Joyce K., 2010, Biomedicalization: technoscience, health and illness in the US

Latimer J., 2013, The gene, the clinic and the family: diagnosing dysmorphology, reviving medical dominance (CESAGEN Genetics and Society Series), 10.4324/9780203441459

Latour B., 1987, Science in action

10.1002/uog.7743

10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.006

10.1215/9780822384151

NHS England(2013)NHS Standard Contract for Fetal Medicine https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/e12-fetal-medi.pdf(accessed October 2015).

Nishizaka A., 2010, The embodied organization of a real‐time fetus: the visible and the invincible in prenatal ultrasound examinations, Social Studies of Science, 2, 1

10.1177/0162243904271758

10.7551/mitpress/9780262026956.001.0001

Prayer D., 2006, Fetal MR, European Journal of Radiology, 57, 2, 171

10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.031

10.1177/0306312709103501

Rapp R., 2011, Sociological reflections on the neurosciences

Reed K, 2012, Gender and genetics: sociology of the prenatal (CESAGEN Genetics and Society Series), 10.4324/9780203870020

10.1177/030631289019003001

10.1111/1467-9566.00342

10.1308/003588407X168244

10.1111/1467-9566.00228

10.1177/0011392102050003009

10.1023/A:1013837511115