“Wearable Sensors to Guide Remote Rehabilitation Following Knee Arthroplasty Surgery”
Tóm tắt
Total knee arthroplasty requires effective rehabilitation to achieve optimal results, but institutions often rely on unsupervised home exercises due to cost constraints. Wearable sensors have become increasingly popular as a potential method of monitoring patients remotely to ensure efficacy and compliance. This review assesses the current evidence for their use in remotely monitored rehabilitation following knee arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature from 1st January 2000 to 17th February 2022 was undertaken. Devices were categorised as joint-specific or physical activity sensors. Studies were classified as those providing remotely supervised rehabilitation as an additional or as an alternative intervention. Remotely supervised rehabilitation using wearable sensors demonstrated similar outcomes when provided as an alternative to standard care in most studies. One group found improved outcomes for knee-specific sensors compared with standard care. There were improved physical activity and healthcare resource use outcomes described in the literature where sensors were used in addition to standard care. This review found evidence for the use of wearable sensors in remotely supervised rehabilitation following knee arthroplasty surgery. This included methodological heterogeneity, differing definitions of standard care, and variable follow-up periods. Robust randomised control trial data with a longer follow-up period are needed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kurtz, S., Ong, K., Lau, E., Mowat, F., & Halpern, M. (2007). Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 89(4), 780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222
Culliford, D., Maskell, J., Judge, A., et al. (2015). Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: Results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 23(4), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.022
National Joint Registry for England and Wales. NJR 17th Annual Report. Published online 2020. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2017th%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf
Baker, P. N., van der Meulen, J. H., Lewsey, J., Gregg, P. J., National Joint Registry for England and Wales. (2007). The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 89(7), 893–900. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091
Brander, V., & Stulberg, S. D. (2006). Rehabilitation after hip- and knee-joint replacement. An experience- and evidence-based approach to care. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 85(11 Suppl), S98-118. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000245569.70723.9d
Ong, K. L., Lotke, P. A., Lau, E., Manley, M. T., & Kurtz, S. M. (2015). Prevalence and costs of rehabilitation and physical therapy after primary TJA. Journal of Arthroplasty, 30(7), 1121–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.030
Bozic, K. J., Ward, L., Vail, T. P., & Maze, M. (2014). Bundled payments in total joint arthroplasty: Targeting opportunities for quality improvement and cost reduction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(1), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3034-3
Henderson, K. G., Wallis, J. A., & Snowdon, D. A. (2018). Active physiotherapy interventions following total knee arthroplasty in the hospital and inpatient rehabilitation settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 104(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2017.01.002
Bade, M. J., & Stevens-Lapsley, J. E. (2011). Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 41(12), 932–941. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3734
Artz, N., Dixon, S., Wylde, V., Beswick, A., Blom, A., & Gooberman-Hill, R. (2013). Physiotherapy provision following discharge after total hip and total knee replacement: A survey of current practice at high-volume NHS hospitals in England and wales. Musculoskeletal Care, 11(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1027
Bassett, S. F., & Prapavessis, H. (2007). Home-based physical therapy intervention with adherence-enhancing strategies versus clinic-based management for patients with ankle sprains. Physical Therapy, 87(9), 1132–1143. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060260
Westby, M. D., Brittain, A., & Backman, C. L. (2014). Expert consensus on best practices for post-acute rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A Canada and United States Delphi study. Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken)., 66(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22164
Bahadori, S., Immins, T., & Wainwright, T. W. (2018). A review of wearable motion tracking systems used in rehabilitation following hip and knee replacement. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 5, 2055668318771816. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668318771816
Piqueras, M., Marco, E., Coll, M., et al. (2013). Effectiveness of an interactive virtual telerehabilitation system in patients after total knee arthoplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(4), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1119
Colomina, J., Drudis, R., Torra, M., et al. (2021). Implementing mHealth-enabled integrated care for complex chronic patients with osteoarthritis undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty: prospective, two-arm, parallel trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e28320. https://doi.org/10.2196/28320
Correia, F. D., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., et al. (2018). Home-based rehabilitation with a novel digital biofeedback system versus conventional in-person rehabilitation after total knee replacement: A feasibility study. Science and Reports, 8(1), 11299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29668-0
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Small, S. R., Bullock, G. S., Khalid, S., Barker, K., Trivella, M., & Price, A. J. (2019). Current clinical utilisation of wearable motion sensors for the assessment of outcome following knee arthroplasty: A scoping review. British Medical Journal Open, 9(12), e033832. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033832
Bell, K. M., Onyeukwu, C., Smith, C. N., et al. (2020). A portable system for remote rehabilitation following a total knee replacement: A pilot randomized controlled clinical study. Sensors (Basel)., 20(21), E6118. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216118
Ramkumar, P. N., Haeberle, H. S., Ramanathan, D., et al. (2019). Remote patient monitoring using mobile health for total knee arthroplasty: Validation of a wearable and machine learning-based surveillance platform. Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(10), 2253–2259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.021
Correia, F. D., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., et al. (2019). Medium-term outcomes of digital versus conventional home-based rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: Prospective, parallel-group feasibility study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 6(1), e13111. https://doi.org/10.2196/13111
Christiansen, M. B., Thoma, L. M., Master, H., et al. (2020). Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a physical therapist-administered physical activity intervention after total knee replacement. Arthritis Care and Research (Hoboken)., 72(5), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23882
Coleman, G., White, D. K., Thoma, L. M., et al. (2021). Does a physical therapist-administered physical activity intervention reduce sedentary time after total knee replacement: An exploratory study? Musculoskeletal Care, 19(1), 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1517
Paxton, R. J., Forster, J. E., Stevens-Lapsley, J. E., & Christiansen, C. L. (2018). A feasibility study for improved physical activity after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 26(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2016-0268
Mehta, S. J., Hume, E., Troxel, A. B., et al. (2020). Effect of remote monitoring on discharge to home, return to activity, and rehospitalization after hip and knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 3(12), e2028328. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28328
Losina, E., Collins, J. E., Deshpande, B. R., et al. (2018). Financial incentives and health coaching to improve physical activity following total knee replacement: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care and Research (Hoboken)., 70(5), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23324
Crawford, D. A., Duwelius, P. J., Sneller, M. A., et al. (2021). 2021 Mark Coventry Award: Use of a smartphone-based care platform after primary partial and total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. The Bone & Joint Journal, 103-B(6 Supple A), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2352.R1
Tripuraneni, K. R., Foran, J. R. H., Munson, N. R., Racca, N. E., & Carothers, J. T. (2021). A Smartwatch paired with a mobile application provides postoperative self-directed rehabilitation without compromising total knee arthroplasty outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Arthroplasty, 36(12), 3888–3893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.007
Lebleu, J., Poilvache, H., Mahaudens, P., De Ridder, R., & Detrembleur, C. (2021). Predicting physical activity recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty? A longitudinal cohort study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 25(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.12.002
Haas, D. A., & Kaplan, R. S. (2016). Variation in the cost of care for primary total knee arthroplasties. Arthroplasty Today., 3(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.08.001