“We can do it together!” – But can they? How Norwegian ninth graders co-constructed content and language knowledge through peer interaction in CLIL

Anderson, 2001 Baker, 2011 Banegas, 2012, Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education: Models, benefits, and challenges, Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 111, 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.1.6 Bruffee, 1995, Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning, Change, 27, 12, 10.1080/00091383.1995.9937722 Bruton, 2011, Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research, System, 39, 523, 10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002 Bruton, 2013, CLIL: Some of the reasons why… and why not, System, 41, 587, 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001 Buchs, 2004, Socio-cognitive conflict and the role of student interaction in learning, New Review of Social Psychology, 3, 80 Cohen, 1994, Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups, Review of Educational Research, 64, 1, 10.3102/00346543064001001 Coyle, 2010 Cummins, 2017, BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction, 59 Dalton-Puffer, 2007 Dalton-Puffer, 2008, Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated (CLIL) learning: Current research in Europe, 139 Dalton-Puffer, 2011, Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles?, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182, 10.1017/S0267190511000092 Dalton-Puffer, 2006, Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms, Applied Linguistics, 27, 241, 10.1093/applin/aml007 Dalton-Puffer, 2010, Charting policies, premises and research on content and language integrated learning, 1 Dalton-Puffer, 2013, Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda, Language Teaching, 46, 545, 10.1017/S0261444813000256 Damon, 1984, Peer education: The untapped potential, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331, 10.1016/0193-3973(84)90006-6 Dembo, 1987, Effects of perceived ability and grade status on social interaction and influence in cooperative groups, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 415, 10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.415 Devos, 2016 DiCamila, 2012, Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanced second language learners, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 160, 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00302.x Donato, 1994, Collective scaffolding in second language learning, 33 Donato, 2004, Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284, 10.1017/S026719050400011X García, 2009 García, 2014 García, 2017, Translanguaging in bilingual education, 117 Gass, 2015, Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition, 180 Gierlinger, 2015, “You can speak German, sir”: On the complexity of teachers’ L1 use in CLIL, Language and Education, 29, 347, 10.1080/09500782.2015.1023733 Hogan, 1999, Implications of Vygotsky's theory for peer learning, 39 Jakonen, 2015, Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom, Applied Linguistics, 36, 73, 10.1093/applin/amt031 Jørgensen, 2002 Kim, 2008, The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners, Language Teaching Research, 12, 211, 10.1177/1362168807086288 King, 1997, ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning, Educational Psychologist, 32, 221, 10.1207/s15326985ep3204_3 Kowal, 1994, Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness, Language Awareness, 3, 73, 10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845 Kyndt, 2013, A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning: Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings?, Educational Research Review, 10, 133, 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002 Lantolf, 2000, Introducing sociocultural theory, 1 Lantolf, 2015, Sociocultural theory and second language development, 207 Lasagabaster, 2017, “I always speak English in my classes”: Reflections on the use of the L1/L2 in English-medium Instruction, 251 Lasagabaster, 2014, Translanguaging: Towards a dynamic model of bilingualism at school, Culture and Education, 26, 557, 10.1080/11356405.2014.973671 Lewis, 2012, Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation, Educational Research and Evaluation, 18, 655, 10.1080/13803611.2012.718490 Lin, 2017, Trans/languaging and the triadic dialogue in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms, Language and Education, 31, 26, 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125 Llinares, 2012 Llinares, 2015, A genre approach to the effect of academic questions on CLIL students’ language production, Language and Education, 29, 15, 10.1080/09500782.2014.924964 Lo, 2018, Impact of genre-based pedagogy on students’ academic literacy development in content and language integrated learning (CLIL), Linguistics and Education, 47, 36, 10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.001 Lorenzo, 2016, Historical literacy in bilingual settings: Cognitive academic language in CLIL history narratives, Linguistics and Education, 37, 32, 10.1016/j.linged.2016.11.002 Lorenzo, 2016, Historical literacy in CLIL: Telling the past in a second language, 55 McNeese, 2000 McWhaw, 2003, From co-operation to collaboration: Helping students become collaborative learners, 69 Moate, 2010, The integrated nature of CLIL: A sociocultural perspective, International CLIL Research Journal, 1 Moore, 2016, Translanguaging in CLIL classrooms, 211 Morton, 2017, Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Type of programme or pedagogical model?, 1 Naudé, 2004, Acquisition of mathematics literacy, 119 Nikula, 2005, English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications, Linguistics and Education, 16, 27, 10.1016/j.linged.2005.10.001 Nikula, 2017, “What's the moment thingy?” – On the emergence of subject-specific knowledge in CLIL classroom interaction, 11 Nikula, 2016, More than content and language: The complexity of integration in CLIL and bilingual education, 1 Nikula, 2019, Exploring translanguaging in CLIL, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 237, 10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151 Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training, 2016 O’Donnell, 2006, The role of peers and group learning, 781 Ohta, 2000, Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar, 51 Ohta, 2013, Sociocultural theory and the zone of proximal development, 648 Pastrana, 2018, Students’ language use for co-construction of knowledge in CLIL group-work activities: A comparison with L1 settings, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21, 49, 10.1007/s11618-017-0802-y Paulsen, 2010 Philp, 2014 Ruiz de Zarobe, 2011, Which language competencies benefit from CLIL? An insight into applied linguistics research, 129 Ruiz de Zarobe, 2015, The effects of implementing CLIL in education, 51 Ruiz de Zarobe, 2017, Language awareness and CLIL, 149 Sato, 2016, Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions, 1 Speitz, 2012, Experiences with an earlier start to modern foreign languages other than English in Norway, 11 Svenhard, 2007, Norway, 139 Swain, 2000, The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue, 97 Swain, 2011 Swain, 1998, Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together, The Modern Language Journal, 83, 320, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x Swain, 2013, A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate, Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 1, 101, 10.1075/jicb.1.1.05swa Sylvén, 2013, CLIL in Sweden – Why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 301, 10.1080/13670050.2013.777387 Unamuno, 2008, Multilingual switch in peer classroom interaction, Linguistics and Education, 19, 1, 10.1016/j.linged.2008.01.002 Vygotsky, 1978 Vygotsky, 1986 Watanabe, 2007, Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners, Language Teaching Research, 11, 121, 10.1177/136216880607074599 Webb, 1982, Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups, Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 642, 10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.642 Webb, 1998, Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance, American Educational Research Journal, 35, 607, 10.3102/00028312035004607 Young, 2016, Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom: Does heterogeneous grouping promote peer linguistic scaffolding?, 135