‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research

Qualitative Research - Tập 13 Số 2 - Trang 190-197 - 2013
Michelle O’Reilly1, Nicola Parker2
1#N#University of Leicester, UK#N#
2Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, UK

Tóm tắt

Measuring quality in qualitative research is a contentious issue with diverse opinions and various frameworks available within the evidence base. One important and somewhat neglected argument within this field relates to the increasingly ubiquitous discourse of data saturation. While originally developed within grounded theory, theoretical saturation, and later termed data/thematic saturation for other qualitative methods, the meaning has evolved and become transformed. Problematically this temporal drift has been treated as unproblematic and saturation as a marker for sampling adequacy is becoming increasingly accepted and expected. In this article we challenge the unquestioned acceptance of the concept of saturation and consider its plausibility and transferability across all qualitative approaches. By considering issues of transparency and epistemology we argue that adopting saturation as a generic quality marker is inappropriate. The aim of this article is to highlight the pertinent issues and encourage the research community to engage with and contribute to this important area.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115

10.1177/1468794107085301

Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J (2003) ‘Clear as mud’: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2(2). Available at: http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_2/html/caellietal.htm

10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x

10.1080/08870440903194015

10.4135/9781849209731.n3

Glaser B, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research

Green J, 2004, Qualitative Methods for Health Research

Guba EG, 2005, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3, 191

10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hutchby I, 2008, Conversation Analysis

Kuzel A, 1992, Doing Qualitative Research, 31

10.1093/fampra/13.6.522

Mason M (2010) Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11(3). Available from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027

Mays N, 2000, Qualitative Research in Health Care, 89

10.1177/1359105306066643

10.1177/104973239500500201

Morse J, 1995, Qualitative Methods for Health Professionals, 2

10.1177/160940690200100202

10.1023/A:1027379223537

10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0

10.1177/14614456020040040901

Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, (2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. Available at: http://www.strategy.gov.uk

10.1177/1049732307307031

10.4135/9781849208895

10.1136/ebn.3.3.68

10.1177/1077800410383121

10.7748/nr2004.07.12.1.47.c5930

10.1177/1049732307308308

10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02467.x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Qualitative Research

Tập 13 Số 2

190-197

Thông tin tác giả